IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0036275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Sabrina Sapari
  • Marie Loh
  • Aparna Vaithilingam
  • Richie Soong

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence indicates aberrant DNA methylation is involved in gastric tumourigenesis, suggesting it may be a useful clinical biomarker for the disease. The aim of this study was to consolidate and summarize published data on the potential of methylation in gastric cancer (GC) risk prediction, prognostication and prediction of treatment response. Methods: Relevant studies were identified from PubMed using a systematic search approach. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were computed for each methylation event assuming the random-effects model. Results: A review of 589 retrieved publications identified 415 relevant articles, including 143 case-control studies on gene methylation of 142 individual genes in GC clinical samples. A total of 77 genes were significantly differentially methylated between tumour and normal gastric tissue from GC subjects, of which data on 62 was derived from single studies. Methylation of 15, 4 and 7 genes in normal gastric tissue, plasma and serum respectively was significantly different in frequency between GC and non-cancer subjects. A prognostic significance was reported for 18 genes and predictive significance was reported for p16 methylation, although many inconsistent findings were also observed. No bias due to assay, use of fixed tissue or CpG sites analysed was detected, however a slight bias towards publication of positive findings was observed. Conclusions: DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for GC risk prediction and prognostication. Further focused validation of candidate methylation markers in independent cohorts is required to develop its clinical potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Sabrina Sapari & Marie Loh & Aparna Vaithilingam & Richie Soong, 2012. "Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0036275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zongyue Zeng & Jiangen Wang & Liuyang Zhao & Ping Hu & Hailong Zhang & Xi Tang & Dali He & Shifu Tang & Zhaofang Zeng, 2013. "Potential Role of microRNA-21 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    2. Jundong Gu & Yanjun Wen & Siwei Zhu & Feng Hua & Hui Zhao & Hongrui Xu & Jiacong You & Linlin Sun & Weiqiang Wang & Jun Chen & Qinghua Zhou, 2013. "Association between P16INK4a Promoter Methylation and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Zhang Lou-Qian & Yin Rong & Li Ming & Yang Xin & Jiang Feng & Xu Lin, 2013. "The Prognostic Value of Epigenetic Silencing of p16 Gene in NSCLC Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.