IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0042492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Universal Computing Architectures for Decoding Neural Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin I Rapoport
  • Lorenzo Turicchia
  • Woradorn Wattanapanitch
  • Thomas J Davidson
  • Rahul Sarpeshkar

Abstract

The ability to decode neural activity into meaningful control signals for prosthetic devices is critical to the development of clinically useful brain– machine interfaces (BMIs). Such systems require input from tens to hundreds of brain-implanted recording electrodes in order to deliver robust and accurate performance; in serving that primary function they should also minimize power dissipation in order to avoid damaging neural tissue; and they should transmit data wirelessly in order to minimize the risk of infection associated with chronic, transcutaneous implants. Electronic architectures for brain– machine interfaces must therefore minimize size and power consumption, while maximizing the ability to compress data to be transmitted over limited-bandwidth wireless channels. Here we present a system of extremely low computational complexity, designed for real-time decoding of neural signals, and suited for highly scalable implantable systems. Our programmable architecture is an explicit implementation of a universal computing machine emulating the dynamics of a network of integrate-and-fire neurons; it requires no arithmetic operations except for counting, and decodes neural signals using only computationally inexpensive logic operations. The simplicity of this architecture does not compromise its ability to compress raw neural data by factors greater than . We describe a set of decoding algorithms based on this computational architecture, one designed to operate within an implanted system, minimizing its power consumption and data transmission bandwidth; and a complementary set of algorithms for learning, programming the decoder, and postprocessing the decoded output, designed to operate in an external, nonimplanted unit. The implementation of the implantable portion is estimated to require fewer than 5000 operations per second. A proof-of-concept, 32-channel field-programmable gate array (FPGA) implementation of this portion is consequently energy efficient. We validate the performance of our overall system by decoding electrophysiologic data from a behaving rodent.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin I Rapoport & Lorenzo Turicchia & Woradorn Wattanapanitch & Thomas J Davidson & Rahul Sarpeshkar, 2012. "Efficient Universal Computing Architectures for Decoding Neural Activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0042492
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042492
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042492&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0042492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leigh R. Hochberg & Mijail D. Serruya & Gerhard M. Friehs & Jon A. Mukand & Maryam Saleh & Abraham H. Caplan & Almut Branner & David Chen & Richard D. Penn & John P. Donoghue, 2006. "Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia," Nature, Nature, vol. 442(7099), pages 164-171, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ujwal Chaudhary & Bin Xia & Stefano Silvoni & Leonardo G Cohen & Niels Birbaumer, 2017. "Brain–Computer Interface–Based Communication in the Completely Locked-In State," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Nuri F Ince & Rahul Gupta & Sami Arica & Ahmed H Tewfik & James Ashe & Giuseppe Pellizzer, 2010. "High Accuracy Decoding of Movement Target Direction in Non-Human Primates Based on Common Spatial Patterns of Local Field Potentials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. No-Sang Kwak & Klaus-Robert Müller & Seong-Whan Lee, 2017. "A convolutional neural network for steady state visual evoked potential classification under ambulatory environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Michael Riss, 2014. "FTSPlot: Fast Time Series Visualization for Large Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Yasuhiko Nakanishi & Takufumi Yanagisawa & Duk Shin & Ryohei Fukuma & Chao Chen & Hiroyuki Kambara & Natsue Yoshimura & Masayuki Hirata & Toshiki Yoshimine & Yasuharu Koike, 2013. "Prediction of Three-Dimensional Arm Trajectories Based on ECoG Signals Recorded from Human Sensorimotor Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Ke Yu & Hasan AI-Nashash & Nitish Thakor & Xiaoping Li, 2014. "The Analytic Bilinear Discrimination of Single-Trial EEG Signals in Rapid Image Triage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, June.
    7. Zheng Li & Joseph E O'Doherty & Timothy L Hanson & Mikhail A Lebedev & Craig S Henriquez & Miguel A L Nicolelis, 2009. "Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Tomislav Milekovic & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Ad Aertsen & Carsten Mehring, 2013. "Detection of Error Related Neuronal Responses Recorded by Electrocorticography in Humans during Continuous Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Eric A Pohlmeyer & Babak Mahmoudi & Shijia Geng & Noeline W Prins & Justin C Sanchez, 2014. "Using Reinforcement Learning to Provide Stable Brain-Machine Interface Control Despite Neural Input Reorganization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Andrés Úbeda & Enrique Hortal & Eduardo Iáñez & Carlos Perez-Vidal & Jose M Azorín, 2015. "Assessing Movement Factors in Upper Limb Kinematics Decoding from EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Ujwal Chaudhary & Ioannis Vlachos & Jonas B. Zimmermann & Arnau Espinosa & Alessandro Tonin & Andres Jaramillo-Gonzalez & Majid Khalili-Ardali & Helge Topka & Jens Lehmberg & Gerhard M. Friehs & Alain, 2022. "Spelling interface using intracortical signals in a completely locked-in patient enabled via auditory neurofeedback training," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Javier León & Juan José Escobar & Andrés Ortiz & Julio Ortega & Jesús González & Pedro Martín-Smith & John Q Gan & Miguel Damas, 2020. "Deep learning for EEG-based Motor Imagery classification: Accuracy-cost trade-off," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Hong Gi Yeom & June Sic Kim & Chun Kee Chung, 2014. "High-Accuracy Brain-Machine Interfaces Using Feedback Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0042492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.