IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0040063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving the Stiffening-Softening Paradox in Cell Mechanics

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Wolff
  • Pablo Fernández
  • Klaus Kroy

Abstract

Background: Despite their notorious diversity, biological cells are mechanically well characterized by only a few robust and universal laws. Intriguingly, the law characterizing the nonlinear response to stretch appears self-contradictory. Various cell types have been reported to both stiffen and soften, or “fluidize” upon stretch. Within the classical paradigm of cells as viscoelastic bodies, this constitutes a paradox. Principal Findings: Our measurements reveal that minimalistic reconstituted cytoskeletal networks (F-actin/HMM) exhibit a similarly peculiar response. A mathematical model of transiently crosslinked polymer networks, the so-called inelastic glassy wormlike chain (iGwlc) model, can simulate the data and resolve the apparent contradiction. It explains the observations in terms of two antagonistic physical mechanisms, the nonlinear viscoelastic resistance of biopolymers to stretch, and the breaking of weak transient bonds between them. Conclusions: Our results imply that the classical paradigm of cells as viscoelastic bodies has to be replaced by such an inelastic mechanical model.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Wolff & Pablo Fernández & Klaus Kroy, 2012. "Resolving the Stiffening-Softening Paradox in Cell Mechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0040063
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0040063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0040063&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0040063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0040063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.