IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0027315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Validation Algorithm Allows for Automated Cell Tracking and the Extraction of Biologically Meaningful Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel H Rapoport
  • Tim Becker
  • Amir Madany Mamlouk
  • Simone Schicktanz
  • Charli Kruse

Abstract

Automated microscopy is currently the only method to non-invasively and label-free observe complex multi-cellular processes, such as cell migration, cell cycle, and cell differentiation. Extracting biological information from a time-series of micrographs requires each cell to be recognized and followed through sequential microscopic snapshots. Although recent attempts to automatize this process resulted in ever improving cell detection rates, manual identification of identical cells is still the most reliable technique. However, its tedious and subjective nature prevented tracking from becoming a standardized tool for the investigation of cell cultures. Here, we present a novel method to accomplish automated cell tracking with a reliability comparable to manual tracking. Previously, automated cell tracking could not rival the reliability of manual tracking because, in contrast to the human way of solving this task, none of the algorithms had an independent quality control mechanism; they missed validation. Thus, instead of trying to improve the cell detection or tracking rates, we proceeded from the idea to automatically inspect the tracking results and accept only those of high trustworthiness, while rejecting all other results. This validation algorithm works independently of the quality of cell detection and tracking through a systematic search for tracking errors. It is based only on very general assumptions about the spatiotemporal contiguity of cell paths. While traditional tracking often aims to yield genealogic information about single cells, the natural outcome of a validated cell tracking algorithm turns out to be a set of complete, but often unconnected cell paths, i.e. records of cells from mitosis to mitosis. This is a consequence of the fact that the validation algorithm takes complete paths as the unit of rejection/acceptance. The resulting set of complete paths can be used to automatically extract important biological parameters with high reliability and statistical significance. These include the distribution of life/cycle times and cell areas, as well as of the symmetry of cell divisions and motion analyses. The new algorithm thus allows for the quantification and parameterization of cell culture with unprecedented accuracy. To evaluate our validation algorithm, two large reference data sets were manually created. These data sets comprise more than 320,000 unstained adult pancreatic stem cells from rat, including 2592 mitotic events. The reference data sets specify every cell position and shape, and assign each cell to the correct branch of its genealogic tree. We provide these reference data sets for free use by others as a benchmark for the future improvement of automated tracking methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel H Rapoport & Tim Becker & Amir Madany Mamlouk & Simone Schicktanz & Charli Kruse, 2011. "A Novel Validation Algorithm Allows for Automated Cell Tracking and the Extraction of Biologically Meaningful Parameters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027315
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027315&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0027315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanna M. Eilken & Shin-Ichi Nishikawa & Timm Schroeder, 2009. "Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7231), pages 896-900, February.
    2. Martin Kragl & Dunja Knapp & Eugen Nacu & Shahryar Khattak & Malcolm Maden & Hans Henning Epperlein & Elly M. Tanaka, 2009. "Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7251), pages 60-65, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Biben & T. S. Weber & K. S. Potts & J. Choi & D. C. Miles & A. Carmagnac & T. Sargeant & C. A. Graaf & K. A. Fennell & A. Farley & O. J. Stonehouse & M. A. Dawson & D. J. Hilton & S. H. Naik & S. T, 2023. "In vivo clonal tracking reveals evidence of haemangioblast and haematomesoblast contribution to yolk sac haematopoiesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Thomas P. Lozito & Ricardo Londono & Aaron X. Sun & Megan L. Hudnall, 2021. "Introducing dorsoventral patterning in adult regenerating lizard tails with gene-edited embryonic neural stem cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jixing Zhong & Rita Aires & Georgios Tsissios & Evangelia Skoufa & Kerstin Brandt & Tatiana Sandoval-Guzmán & Can Aztekin, 2023. "Multi-species atlas resolves an axolotl limb development and regeneration paradox," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Qiang Zhao & Young-Min Han & Ping Song & Zhixue Liu & Zuyi Yuan & Ming-Hui Zou, 2022. "Endothelial cell-specific expression of serine/threonine kinase 11 modulates dendritic cell differentiation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. D. M. Jeziorska & E. A. J. Tunnacliffe & J. M. Brown & H. Ayyub & J. Sloane-Stanley & J. A. Sharpe & B. C. Lagerholm & C. Babbs & A. J. H. Smith & V. J. Buckle & D. R. Higgs, 2022. "On-microscope staging of live cells reveals changes in the dynamics of transcriptional bursting during differentiation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Béryl Laplace-Builhé & Audrey Barthelaix & Said Assou & Candice Bohaud & Marine Pratlong & Dany Severac & Gautier Tejedor & Patricia Luz-Crawford & Mai Nguyen-Chi & Marc Mathieu & Christian Jorgensen , 2021. "NRG1/ErbB signalling controls the dialogue between macrophages and neural crest-derived cells during zebrafish fin regeneration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Geethika Arekatla & Stavroula Skylaki & David Corredor Suarez & Hartland Jackson & Denis Schapiro & Stefanie Engler & Markus Auler & German Camargo Ortega & Simon Hastreiter & Andreas Reimann & Dirk L, 2024. "Identification of an embryonic differentiation stage marked by Sox1 and FoxA2 co-expression using combined cell tracking and high dimensional protein imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.