IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0020060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Parametric Change-Point Method for Differential Gene Expression Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Wang
  • Chunguo Wu
  • Zhaohua Ji
  • Binghong Wang
  • Yanchun Liang

Abstract

Background: We proposed a non-parametric method, named Non-Parametric Change Point Statistic (NPCPS for short), by using a single equation for detecting differential gene expression (DGE) in microarray data. NPCPS is based on the change point theory to provide effective DGE detecting ability. Methodology: NPCPS used the data distribution of the normal samples as input, and detects DGE in the cancer samples by locating the change point of gene expression profile. An estimate of the change point position generated by NPCPS enables the identification of the samples containing DGE. Monte Carlo simulation and ROC study were applied to examine the detecting accuracy of NPCPS, and the experiment on real microarray data of breast cancer was carried out to compare NPCPS with other methods. Conclusions: Simulation study indicated that NPCPS was more effective for detecting DGE in cancer subset compared with five parametric methods and one non-parametric method. When there were more than 8 cancer samples containing DGE, the type I error of NPCPS was below 0.01. Experiment results showed both good accuracy and reliability of NPCPS. Out of the 30 top genes ranked by using NPCPS, 16 genes were reported as relevant to cancer. Correlations between the detecting result of NPCPS and the compared methods were less than 0.05, while between the other methods the values were from 0.20 to 0.84. This indicates that NPCPS is working on different features and thus provides DGE identification from a distinct perspective comparing with the other mean or median based methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Wang & Chunguo Wu & Zhaohua Ji & Binghong Wang & Yanchun Liang, 2011. "Non-Parametric Change-Point Method for Differential Gene Expression Detection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020060
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020060
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020060&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0020060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Efron B. & Tibshirani R. & Storey J.D. & Tusher V., 2001. "Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1151-1160, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngchao Ge & Sandrine Dudoit & Terence Speed, 2003. "Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 1-77, June.
    2. Pounds Stanley B. & Gao Cuilan L. & Zhang Hui, 2012. "Empirical Bayesian Selection of Hypothesis Testing Procedures for Analysis of Sequence Count Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Niels Lundtorp Olsen & Alessia Pini & Simone Vantini, 2021. "False discovery rate for functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 784-809, September.
    4. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    5. Hossain, Ahmed & Beyene, Joseph & Willan, Andrew R. & Hu, Pingzhao, 2009. "A flexible approximate likelihood ratio test for detecting differential expression in microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3685-3695, August.
    6. Dørum Guro & Snipen Lars & Solheim Margrete & Saebo Solve, 2011. "Smoothing Gene Expression Data with Network Information Improves Consistency of Regulated Genes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Daniel Yekutieli, 2015. "Bayesian tests for composite alternative hypotheses in cross-tabulated data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 287-301, June.
    8. Ghosh Debashis, 2012. "Incorporating the Empirical Null Hypothesis into the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Ruth Heller & Saharon Rosset, 2021. "Optimal control of false discovery criteria in the two‐group model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(1), pages 133-155, February.
    10. Yu Lianbo & Gulati Parul & Fernandez Soledad & Pennell Michael & Kirschner Lawrence & Jarjoura David, 2011. "Fully Moderated T-statistic for Small Sample Size Gene Expression Arrays," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Werft, W. & Benner, A. & Kopp-Schneider, A., 2012. "On the identification of predictive biomarkers: Detecting treatment-by-gene interaction in high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1275-1286.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13437 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Han, Shengtong & Zhang, Hongmei & Karmaus, Wilfried & Roberts, Graham & Arshad, Hasan, 2017. "Adjusting background noise in cluster analyses of longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 93-104.
    14. Ahmed Hossain & Hafiz T.A. Khan, 2016. "Identification of genomic markers correlated with sensitivity in solid tumors to Dasatinib using sparse principal components," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(14), pages 2538-2549, October.
    15. HyungJun Cho & Jaewoo Kang & Jae Lee, 2009. "Empirical Bayes analysis of unreplicated microarray data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 393-408, August.
    16. Xiaoquan Wen, 2017. "Robust Bayesian FDR Control Using Bayes Factors, with Applications to Multi-tissue eQTL Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 28-49, June.
    17. Kline, Patrick & Walters, Christopher, 2019. "Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt3z72m9kn, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    18. He, Yi & Pan, Wei & Lin, Jizhen, 2006. "Cluster analysis using multivariate normal mixture models to detect differential gene expression with microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 641-658, November.
    19. Alejandro Ochoa & John D Storey & Manuel Llinás & Mona Singh, 2015. "Beyond the E-Value: Stratified Statistics for Protein Domain Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Bansal Naveen K., 2007. "Decision theoretic Bayesian hypothesis testing with the selection goal," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 19-39, January.
    21. Zhang Qi & Xu Zheng & Lai Yutong, 2021. "An Empirical Bayes approach for the identification of long-range chromosomal interaction from Hi-C data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.