IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the implications of Zika Virus for infant feeding? A synthesis of qualitative evidence concerning Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) and comparable conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Carroll
  • Andrew Booth
  • Fiona Campbell
  • Clare Relton

Abstract

If a mother contracts the Zika Virus before or during pregnancy, then there is a risk of the child developing Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). An infant can then experience problems feeding due to the specific physical and developmental consequences of Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS), such as microcephaly, dysphagia and an increased likelihood of choking. This qualitative evidence synthesis accesses direct and indirect evidence to inform WHO infant feeding guidelines. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis of the values and preferences of relevant stakeholders (e.g. pregnant women, mothers, family members and health practitioners) concerning infant (0–2 years) feeding in the presence of: 1) CZS (the‘direct evidence’); 2) severe disability and nonprogressive, chronic encephalopathies (‘indirect evidence’), which present with similar problems. Authors’ findings were extracted, synthesised using thematic synthesis techniques, and confidence in the findings were assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Six CZS-specific studies (all from Brazil) were included in the direct evidence, with a further eight indirect studies reporting feeding difficulties in infants with severe disability and nonprogressive, chronic encephalopathies. Included studies highlighted: breast-feeding represented the preference for all mothers in the studies in both reviews, and the inability to do so affected bonding between parents and child, and generated fear and anxiety relating to feeding choices, especially around the risks of choking and swallowing; the perception that health professionals were often unable to offer appropriate advice; the potential value of training; and a strong desire to achieve individual maternal autonomy in infant feeding decisions. Confidence in most findings ranged from low to moderate. The evidence base has limitations, but consistently reported that parents of children with feeding difficulties due to Congenital Zika Syndrome, or similar, need information, advice and counselling, and substantial emotional support. Parents perceive that these needs are often neither recognised nor satisfied; optimal feeding and support strategies for this population have not yet been identified.Author summary: If a mother contracts the Zika Virus during pregnancy, there is a risk of the child developing Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS), which can lead to feeding difficulties due to swallowing and choking. It is therefore important to understand the lived experiences of those who support infants who have contracted CZS, so that infant feeding can be improved. The review and synthesis identified only a small number of relevant CZS qualitative studies (n = 6), all from Brazil (the ‘direct’ evidence). As a result, the review was expanded to include qualitative studies of the lived experience of mothers and others regarding infant feeding in the presence of similar physical problems, e.g. Cerebral Palsy (the ‘indirect’ evidence, n = 8). The phenomenon of interest was the same, though the underlying conditions were different. Both the direct and indirect evidence documented parental fear, anxiety and uncertainty around the problems they faced; the difficulties for maternal-child bonding; the potential value of training; and emphasised the perception that health professionals were poorly equipped to provide relevant information and advice. In particular, mothers wanted the specific feeding difficulties of their children to be taken into account when receiving advice and counselling. This synthesis has informed the WHO infant feeding guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Carroll & Andrew Booth & Fiona Campbell & Clare Relton, 2020. "What are the implications of Zika Virus for infant feeding? A synthesis of qualitative evidence concerning Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) and comparable conditions," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008731
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008731
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008731&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Lewin & Claire Glenton & Heather Munthe-Kaas & Benedicte Carlsen & Christopher J Colvin & Metin Gülmezoglu & Jane Noyes & Andrew Booth & Ruth Garside & Arash Rashidian, 2015. "Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Michelle Carr Swift & Ingrid Scholten, 2010. "Not feeding, not coming home: parental experiences of infant feeding difficulties and family relationships in a neonatal unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 249-258, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Jewett Nieuwoudt & Christian B Ngandu & Lenore Manderson & Shane A Norris, 2019. "Exclusive breastfeeding policy, practice and influences in South Africa, 1980 to 2018: A mixed-methods systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Nnamdi Ifeanyi Maduekwe & Olufunmilayo O. Banjo & Mike O. Sangodapo, 2018. "Data for the Sustainable Development Goals: Metrics for Evaluating Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems Data Relevance and Production Capacity, Illustrations with Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 101-124, November.
    3. Howard White & Bianca Albers & Marie Gaarder & Hege Kornør & Julia Littell & Zack Marshall & Christine Mathew & Terri Pigott & Birte Snilstveit & Hugh Waddington & Vivian Welch, 2020. "Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    4. Akio Tada & Hiroko Miura, 2019. "The Relationship between Vitamin C and Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. André Ramalho & João Serrano & Rui Paulo & Pedro Duarte-Mendes & António Rosado & João Petrica, 2021. "Emerging Qualitative Research Trends (2010–2021) on Sedentary Behaviour among Older Adults: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-8, November.
    6. Ian Young & Lisa Waddell, 2016. "Barriers and Facilitators to Safe Food Handling among Consumers: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Marjorie Chinen & Thomas de Hoop & María Balarin & Lorena Alcázar, 2016. "PROTOCOL: Vocational and business training to increase women's participation in higher skilled occupations in low‐ and middle‐income countries: protocol for a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-46.
    8. Joanne Khabsa & Jennifer Petkovic & Alison Riddle & Lyubov Lytvyn & Olivia Magwood & Pearl Atwere & Pauline Campbell & Srinivasa V. Katikireddi & Bronwen Merner & Mona Nasser & Stephanie Chang & Aleja, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Conflict of interest issues when engaging stakeholders in health and healthcare guideline development: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    9. Claire Pentecost & Julia Frost & Holly V. R. Sugg & Angelique Hilli & Victoria A. Goodwin & David A. Richards, 2020. "Patients' and nurses' experiences of fundamental nursing care: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1858-1882, June.
    10. Dua'a Fayiz Al Maghaireh & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Chong Mei Chan & Chua Yan Piaw & Mariam Mofleh Al Kawafha, 2016. "Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2745-2756, October.
    11. Zoe Nomakhushe Nxusani & Mthokozisi Kwazi Zuma & Xikombiso Gertrude Mbhenyane, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Indigenous Food Plant Usage in Southern Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Matt Driedger & Alain Mayhew & Vivian Welch & Eric Agbata & Doug Gruner & Christina Greenaway & Teymur Noori & Monica Sandu & Thierry Sangou & Christine Mathew & Harneel Kaur & Manish Pareek & Kevin P, 2018. "Accessibility and Acceptability of Infectious Disease Interventions Among Migrants in the EU/EEA: A CERQual Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Kevin Daniels & David Watson & Cigdem Gedikli, 2017. "Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Alison Riddle & Abby Ramage & Cynthia M. Kroeger & Zulfiqar A. Bhutta & Elizabeth Kristjansson & Monica Taljaard & Carol Vlassoff & Sara Wuehler & Becky Skidmore & Alexandria L. Bennett & Anita Rizvi , 2021. "PROTOCOL: The effects of empowerment‐based nutrition interventions on the nutritional status of women of reproductive age in low‐ and middle‐income countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    15. Ann Kristin Bjørnnes & Astrid Torbjørnsen & Berit Taraldsen Valeberg & B. Bente Sparboe-Nilsen & Ida Hellum Sandbekken & Kari Almendingen & Marit Leegaard & Ingrid Ravn & M. Torill Sæterstrand & Bo, 2021. "What is Known About Students and Sleep: Systematic Review and Evidence Map," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    16. Eva Esteban & Michaela Coenen & Elizabeth Ito & Sonja Gruber & Chiara Scaratti & Matilde Leonardi & Olga Roka & Evdokia Vasilou & Amalia Muñoz-Murillo & Carolina C. Ávila & Dare S. Kovačič & Ivana Iva, 2018. "Views and Experiences of Persons with Chronic Diseases about Strategies that Aim to Integrate and Re-Integrate Them into Work: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    17. Sara Fernández-Basanta & Manuel Lagoa-Millarengo & María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández, 2021. "Encountering Parents Who Are Hesitant or Reluctant to Vaccinate Their Children: A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Louise Mansfield & Christina Victor & Catherine Meads & Norma Daykin & Alan Tomlinson & Jack Lane & Karen Gray & Alex Golding, 2021. "A Conceptual Review of Loneliness in Adults: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Anna Bergenheim & Gunnar Ahlborg & Susanne Bernhardsson, 2021. "Nature-Based Rehabilitation for Patients with Long-Standing Stress-Related Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Patients’ Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Lawless, Michael T. & Tieu, Matthew & Feo, Rebecca & Kitson, Alison L., 2021. "Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.