IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1006495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) Calculator Shows that Hiding Heritability Is Partially Due to Imperfect Genetic Correlations across Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald de Vlaming
  • Aysu Okbay
  • Cornelius A Rietveld
  • Magnus Johannesson
  • Patrik K E Magnusson
  • André G Uitterlinden
  • Frank J A van Rooij
  • Albert Hofman
  • Patrick J F Groenen
  • A Roy Thurik
  • Philipp D Koellinger

Abstract

Large-scale genome-wide association results are typically obtained from a fixed-effects meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from multiple studies spanning different regions and/or time periods. This approach averages the estimated effects of genetic variants across studies. In case genetic effects are heterogeneous across studies, the statistical power of a GWAS and the predictive accuracy of polygenic scores are attenuated, contributing to the so-called ‘missing heritability’. Here, we describe the online Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) calculator (available at www.devlaming.eu) which quantifies this attenuation based on a novel multi-study framework. By means of simulation studies, we show that under a wide range of genetic architectures, the statistical power and predictive accuracy provided by this calculator are accurate. We compare the predictions from the MetaGAP calculator with actual results obtained in the GWAS literature. Specifically, we use genomic-relatedness-matrix restricted maximum likelihood to estimate the SNP heritability and cross-study genetic correlation of height, BMI, years of education, and self-rated health in three large samples. These estimates are used as input parameters for the MetaGAP calculator. Results from the calculator suggest that cross-study heterogeneity has led to attenuation of statistical power and predictive accuracy in recent large-scale GWAS efforts on these traits (e.g., for years of education, we estimate a relative loss of 51–62% in the number of genome-wide significant loci and a relative loss in polygenic score R2 of 36–38%). Hence, cross-study heterogeneity contributes to the missing heritability.Author Summary: Large-scale genome-wide association studies are uncovering the genetic architecture of traits which are affected by many genetic variants. In such efforts, one typically meta-analyzes association results from multiple studies spanning different regions and/or time periods. Results from such efforts do not yet capture a large share of the heritability. The origins of this so-called ‘missing heritability’ have been strongly debated. One factor exacerbating the missing heritability is heterogeneity in the effects of genetic variants across studies. The effect of this type of heterogeneity on statistical power to detect associated genetic variants and the accuracy of polygenic predictions is poorly understood. In the current study, we derive the precise effects of heterogeneity in genetic effects across studies on both the statistical power to detect associated genetic variants as well as the accuracy of polygenic predictions. We present an online calculator, available at www.devlaming.eu, which accounts for these effects. By means of this calculator, we show that imperfect genetic correlations between studies substantially decrease statistical power and predictive accuracy and, thereby, contribute to the missing heritability. The MetaGAP calculator helps researchers to gauge how sensitive their results will be to heterogeneity in genetic effects across studies. If strong heterogeneity is expected, random-effects meta-analysis methods should be used instead of fixed-effects methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald de Vlaming & Aysu Okbay & Cornelius A Rietveld & Magnus Johannesson & Patrik K E Magnusson & André G Uitterlinden & Frank J A van Rooij & Albert Hofman & Patrick J F Groenen & A Roy Thurik & Ph, 2017. "Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) Calculator Shows that Hiding Heritability Is Partially Due to Imperfect Genetic Correlations across Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1006495
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006495
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006495&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meike Bartels & Daniel J. Benjamin & David Cesarini & Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Magnus Johannesson & Philipp D. Koellinger & Robert F. Krueger & Patrik K. E. Magnusson & Nancy L. Pedersen & Cornelius A. , 2013. "Molecular Genetics and Subjective Well-Being," CEP Discussion Papers dp1225, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Aysu Okbay & Jonathan P. Beauchamp & Mark Alan Fontana & James J. Lee & Tune H. Pers & Cornelius A. Rietveld & Patrick Turley & Guo-Bo Chen & Valur Emilsson & S. Fleur W. Meddens & Sven Oskarsson & Jo, 2016. "Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7604), pages 539-542, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans Kippersluis & Pietro Biroli & Rita Dias Pereira & Titus J. Galama & Stephanie Hinke & S. Fleur W. Meddens & Dilnoza Muslimova & Eric A. W. Slob & Ronald Vlaming & Cornelius A. Rietveld, 2023. "Overcoming attenuation bias in regressions using polygenic indices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Daniel J. Benjamin & David Cesarini & Patrick Turley & Alexander Strudwick Young, 2024. "Social-Science Genomics: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions," NBER Working Papers 32404, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crispin H. V. Cooper, 2020. "Quantitative Models of Well-Being to Inform Policy: Problems and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Mitchell, Brittany L. & Hansell, Narelle K. & McAloney, Kerrie & Martin, Nicholas G. & Wright, Margaret J. & Renteria, Miguel E. & Grasby, Katrina L., 2022. "Polygenic influences associated with adolescent cognitive skills," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel & Diener, Ed & Tay, Louis & Xuereb, Cody, 2013. "The objective benefits of subjective well-being," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Barban, Nicola & De Cao, Elisabetta & Oreffice, Sonia & Quintana-Domeque, Climent, 2021. "The effect of education on spousal education: A genetic approach," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. von Hinke, Stephanie & Sørensen, Emil N., 2023. "The long-term effects of early-life pollution exposure: Evidence from the London smog," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Viinikainen, Jutta & Bryson, Alex & Böckerman, Petri & Kari, Jaana T. & Lehtimäki, Terho & Raitakari, Olli & Viikari, Jorma & Pehkonen, Jaakko, 2022. "Does better education mitigate risky health behavior? A mendelian randomization study," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    7. Morten Dybdahl Krebs & Gonçalo Espregueira Themudo & Michael Eriksen Benros & Ole Mors & Anders D. Børglum & David Hougaard & Preben Bo Mortensen & Merete Nordentoft & Michael J. Gandal & Chun Chieh F, 2021. "Associations between patterns in comorbid diagnostic trajectories of individuals with schizophrenia and etiological factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Chris Bidner & John Knowles, 2018. "Matching for Social Mobility with Unobserved Heritable Characteristics," Discussion Papers dp18-05, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    9. Lauren L. Schmitz & Dalton Conley, 2016. "The Effect of Vietnam-Era Conscription and Genetic Potential for Educational Attainment on Schooling Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 22393, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Brooke M Huibregtse & Breanne L Newell-Stamper & Benjamin W Domingue & Jason D Boardman & Anna Zajacova, 2021. "Genes Related to Education Predict Frailty Among Older Adults in the United States [Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(1), pages 173-183.
    11. Liang, X.; & Sanderson, E.; & Windmeijer, F.;, 2022. "Selecting Valid Instrumental Variables in Linear Models with Multiple Exposure Variables: Adaptive Lasso and the Median-of-Medians Estimator," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/22, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    12. Fletcher, Jason, 2023. "Decoupling genetics from attainments: The role of social environments," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Gerard J. van den Berg & Stephanie von Hinke & Nicolai Vitt, 2023. "Early life exposure to measles and later-life outcomes: Evidence from the introduction of a vaccine," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 23/776, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    14. Tzu-Ting Chen & Jaeyoung Kim & Max Lam & Yi-Fang Chuang & Yen-Ling Chiu & Shu-Chin Lin & Sang-Hyuk Jung & Beomsu Kim & Soyeon Kim & Chamlee Cho & Injeong Shim & Sanghyeon Park & Yeeun Ahn & Aysu Okbay, 2024. "Shared genetic architectures of educational attainment in East Asian and European populations," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 562-575, March.
    15. Nagel, Mats, 2020. "Changing perspectives: Towards detailed phenotyping in genetics," Thesis Commons a4nz2, Center for Open Science.
    16. Lee, James J. & McGue, Matt & Iacono, William G. & Michael, Andrew M. & Chabris, Christopher F., 2019. "The causal influence of brain size on human intelligence: Evidence from within-family phenotypic associations and GWAS modeling," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 48-58.
    17. Ronaldo N. Verano, PhD, 2024. "Level of Competence of Teachers in Filipino in the 2013 Filipino Orthography: Basis for Crafting Lesson Exemplars in Teaching Orthographic Rules," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 5548-5621, November.
    18. Hilger, Kirsten & Spinath, Frank M. & Troche, Stefan & Schubert, Anna-Lena, 2022. "The biological basis of intelligence: Benchmark findings," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Jung, Dawoon & Lee, Jinkook & Meijer, Erik, 2022. "Revisiting the effect of retirement on Cognition: Heterogeneity and endowment," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    20. Nicholas W Papageorge & Kevin Thom, 2020. "Genes, Education, and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1351-1399.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1006495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.