IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1003443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Rare, Exonic Variation amongst Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Population Controls

Author

Listed:
  • Li Liu
  • Aniko Sabo
  • Benjamin M Neale
  • Uma Nagaswamy
  • Christine Stevens
  • Elaine Lim
  • Corneliu A Bodea
  • Donna Muzny
  • Jeffrey G Reid
  • Eric Banks
  • Hillary Coon
  • Mark DePristo
  • Huyen Dinh
  • Tim Fennel
  • Jason Flannick
  • Stacey Gabriel
  • Kiran Garimella
  • Shannon Gross
  • Alicia Hawes
  • Lora Lewis
  • Vladimir Makarov
  • Jared Maguire
  • Irene Newsham
  • Ryan Poplin
  • Stephan Ripke
  • Khalid Shakir
  • Kaitlin E Samocha
  • Yuanqing Wu
  • Eric Boerwinkle
  • Joseph D Buxbaum
  • Edwin H Cook Jr
  • Bernie Devlin
  • Gerard D Schellenberg
  • James S Sutcliffe
  • Mark J Daly
  • Richard A Gibbs
  • Kathryn Roeder

Abstract

We report on results from whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 1,039 subjects diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and 870 controls selected from the NIMH repository to be of similar ancestry to cases. The WES data came from two centers using different methods to produce sequence and to call variants from it. Therefore, an initial goal was to ensure the distribution of rare variation was similar for data from different centers. This proved straightforward by filtering called variants by fraction of missing data, read depth, and balance of alternative to reference reads. Results were evaluated using seven samples sequenced at both centers and by results from the association study. Next we addressed how the data and/or results from the centers should be combined. Gene-based analyses of association was an obvious choice, but should statistics for association be combined across centers (meta-analysis) or should data be combined and then analyzed (mega-analysis)? Because of the nature of many gene-based tests, we showed by theory and simulations that mega-analysis has better power than meta-analysis. Finally, before analyzing the data for association, we explored the impact of population structure on rare variant analysis in these data. Like other recent studies, we found evidence that population structure can confound case-control studies by the clustering of rare variants in ancestry space; yet, unlike some recent studies, for these data we found that principal component-based analyses were sufficient to control for ancestry and produce test statistics with appropriate distributions. After using a variety of gene-based tests and both meta- and mega-analysis, we found no new risk genes for ASD in this sample. Our results suggest that standard gene-based tests will require much larger samples of cases and controls before being effective for gene discovery, even for a disorder like ASD.Author Summary: This study evaluates association of rare variants and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in case and control samples sequenced by two centers. Before doing association analyses, we studied how to combine information across studies. We first harmonized the whole-exome sequence (WES) data, across centers, in terms of the distribution of rare variation. Key features included filtering called variants by fraction of missing data, read depth, and balance of alternative to reference reads. After filtering, the vast majority of variants calls from seven samples sequenced at both centers matched. We also evaluated whether one should combine summary statistics from data from each center (meta-analysis) or combine data and analyze it together (mega-analysis). For many gene-based tests, we showed that mega-analysis yields more power. After quality control of data from 1,039 ASD cases and 870 controls and a range of analyses, no gene showed exome-wide evidence of significant association. Our results comport with recent results demonstrating that hundreds of genes affect risk for ASD; they suggest that rare risk variants are scattered across these many genes, and thus larger samples will be required to identify those genes.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Liu & Aniko Sabo & Benjamin M Neale & Uma Nagaswamy & Christine Stevens & Elaine Lim & Corneliu A Bodea & Donna Muzny & Jeffrey G Reid & Eric Banks & Hillary Coon & Mark DePristo & Huyen Dinh & Tim, 2013. "Analysis of Rare, Exonic Variation amongst Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Population Controls," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1003443
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003443
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003443&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian J. O’Roak & Laura Vives & Santhosh Girirajan & Emre Karakoc & Niklas Krumm & Bradley P. Coe & Roie Levy & Arthur Ko & Choli Lee & Joshua D. Smith & Emily H. Turner & Ian B. Stanaway & Benjamin V, 2012. "Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 246-250, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew D Shirley & Laurence Frelin & José Soria López & Anne Jedlicka & Amanda Dziedzic & Michelle A Frank-Crawford & Wayne Silverman & Louis Hagopian & Jonathan Pevsner, 2016. "Copy Number Variants Associated with 14 Cases of Self-Injurious Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Xiaolin Zhu & Raghavendra Padmanabhan & Brett Copeland & Joshua Bridgers & Zhong Ren & Sitharthan Kamalakaran & Ailbhe O'Driscoll-Collins & Samuel F Berkovic & Ingrid E Scheffer & Annapurna Poduri & D, 2017. "A case-control collapsing analysis identifies epilepsy genes implicated in trio sequencing studies focused on de novo mutations," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Srirangan Sampath & Shambu Bhat & Simone Gupta & Ashley O’Connor & Andrew B West & Dan E Arking & Aravinda Chakravarti, 2013. "Defining the Contribution of CNTNAP2 to Autism Susceptibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    4. Idan Menashe & Pascal Grange & Eric C Larsen & Sharmila Banerjee-Basu & Partha P Mitra, 2013. "Co-expression Profiling of Autism Genes in the Mouse Brain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Tetsushi Sadakata & Yo Shinoda & Akira Sato & Hirotoshi Iguchi & Chiaki Ishii & Makoto Matsuo & Ryosuke Yamaga & Teiichi Furuichi, 2013. "Mouse Models of Mutations and Variations in Autism Spectrum Disorder-Associated Genes: Mice Expressing Caps2/Cadps2 Copy Number and Alternative Splicing Variants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Richard Newton & Lorenz Wernisch, 2019. "A meta-analysis of multiple matched aCGH/expression cancer datasets reveals regulatory relationships and pathway enrichment of potential oncogenes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1003443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.