IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/0030098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Genomic Pathway Approach to a Complex Disease: Axon Guidance and Parkinson Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy G Lesnick
  • Spiridon Papapetropoulos
  • Deborah C Mash
  • Jarlath Ffrench-Mullen
  • Lina Shehadeh
  • Mariza de Andrade
  • John R Henley
  • Walter A Rocca
  • J Eric Ahlskog
  • Demetrius M Maraganore

Abstract

While major inroads have been made in identifying the genetic causes of rare Mendelian disorders, little progress has been made in the discovery of common gene variations that predispose to complex diseases. The single gene variants that have been shown to associate reproducibly with complex diseases typically have small effect sizes or attributable risks. However, the joint actions of common gene variants within pathways may play a major role in predisposing to complex diseases (the paradigm of complex genetics). The goal of this study was to determine whether polymorphism in a candidate pathway (axon guidance) predisposed to a complex disease (Parkinson disease [PD]). We mined a whole-genome association dataset and identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were within axon-guidance pathway genes. We then constructed models of axon-guidance pathway SNPs that predicted three outcomes: PD susceptibility (odds ratio = 90.8, p = 4.64 × 10−38), survival free of PD (hazards ratio = 19.0, p = 5.43 × 10−48), and PD age at onset (R2 = 0.68, p = 1.68 × 10−51). By contrast, models constructed from thousands of random selections of genomic SNPs predicted the three PD outcomes poorly. Mining of a second whole-genome association dataset and mining of an expression profiling dataset also supported a role for many axon-guidance pathway genes in PD. These findings could have important implications regarding the pathogenesis of PD. This genomic pathway approach may also offer insights into other complex diseases such as Alzheimer disease, diabetes mellitus, nicotine and alcohol dependence, and several cancers.: Complex diseases are common disorders that are believed to have many causes. Examples include Alzheimer disease, diabetes mellitus, nicotine and alcohol dependence, and several cancers. This study represents a paradigm shift from single gene to pathway studies of complex diseases. We present the example of Parkinson disease (PD) and a complex array of chemical signals that wires the brain during fetal development (the axon guidance pathway). We mined a dataset that studied hundreds of thousands of DNA variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) in persons with and without PD and identified SNPs that were assigned to axon-guidance pathway genes. We then identified sets of SNPs that were highly predictive of PD susceptibility, survival free of PD, and age at onset of PD. The effect sizes and the statistical significance observed for the pathway were far greater than for any single gene. We validated our findings for the pathway using a second SNP dataset for PD and also a dataset for PD that studied RNA variations. There is prior evidence that the axon guidance pathway might play a role in other brain disorders (e.g., Alzheimer disease, Tourette syndrome, dyslexia, epilepsy, and schizophrenia). A genomic pathway approach may lead to important breakthroughs for many complex diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy G Lesnick & Spiridon Papapetropoulos & Deborah C Mash & Jarlath Ffrench-Mullen & Lina Shehadeh & Mariza de Andrade & John R Henley & Walter A Rocca & J Eric Ahlskog & Demetrius M Maraganore, 2007. "A Genomic Pathway Approach to a Complex Disease: Axon Guidance and Parkinson Disease," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:0030098
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030098
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030098&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis S. Collins & Eric D. Green & Alan E. Guttmacher & Mark S. Guyer, 2003. "A vision for the future of genomics research," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6934), pages 835-847, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelsey Chalmers & Elizabeth M Kita & Ethan K Scott & Geoffrey J Goodhill, 2016. "Quantitative Analysis of Axonal Branch Dynamics in the Developing Nervous System," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Feng Zhang & Xiong Guo & Shixun Wu & Jing Han & Yongjun Liu & Hui Shen & Hong-Wen Deng, 2012. "Genome-Wide Pathway Association Studies of Multiple Correlated Quantitative Phenotypes Using Principle Component Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Silver Matt & Montana Giovanni & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2012. "Fast Identification of Biological Pathways Associated with a Quantitative Trait Using Group Lasso with Overlaps," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-43, January.
    4. Yvonne J K Edwards & Gary W Beecham & William K Scott & Sawsan Khuri & Guney Bademci & Demet Tekin & Eden R Martin & Zhijie Jiang & Deborah C Mash & Jarlath ffrench-Mullen & Margaret A Pericak-Vance &, 2011. "Identifying Consensus Disease Pathways in Parkinson's Disease Using an Integrative Systems Biology Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Mateus Rocha de Paula & Regina Berretta & Pablo Moscato, 2016. "A fast meta-heuristic approach for the $$(\alpha ,\beta )-k$$ ( α , β ) - k -feature set problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 199-220, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ZHU Chen & MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki, 2022. "Government R&D spending as a driving force of technology convergence," Discussion papers 22030, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Navon, Daniel & Shwed, Uri, 2012. "The chromosome 22q11.2 deletion: From the unification of biomedical fields to a new kind of genetic condition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(9), pages 1633-1641.
    3. Sandra Millon Underwood & Aaron G. Buseh & Sheryl T. Kelber & Patricia E. Stevens & Leolia Townsend, 2013. "Enhancing the Participation of African Americans in Health-Related Genetic Research: Findings of a Collaborative Academic and Community-Based Research Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, December.
    4. Sabatello, Maya & Insel, Beverly J. & Corbeil, Thomas & Link, Bruce G. & Appelbaum, Paul S., 2021. "The double helix at school: Behavioral genetics, disability, and precision education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Pinar, Candas & Almeling, Rene & Gadarian, Shana Kushner, 2018. "Does genetic risk for common adult diseases influence reproductive plans? Evidence from a national survey experiment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 62-68.
    6. Nchangwi Syntia Munung & Bongani M Mayosi & Jantina de Vries, 2017. "Equity in international health research collaborations in Africa: Perceptions and expectations of African researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Gail E. Henderson, 2008. "Introducing Social and Ethical Perspectives on Gene—Environment Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(2), pages 251-276, November.
    8. Theresa M. Marteau & Scott Roberts & Susan LaRusse & Robert C. Green, 2005. "Predictive Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease: Impact upon Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 397-404, April.
    9. Liang Yulan & Kelemen Arpad, 2016. "Bayesian state space models for dynamic genetic network construction across multiple tissues," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 273-290, August.
    10. Cambrosio, Alberto & Keating, Peter & Schlich, Thomas & Weisz, George, 2006. "Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 189-199, July.
    11. Kathleen T. Hickey & Robert R. Sciacca & Mary S. McCarthy, 2013. "Descriptive survey of Summer Genetics Institute nurse graduates in the USA," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 3-8, March.
    12. Miller, Fiona Alice & Ahern, Catherine & Ogilvie, Jacqueline & Giacomini, Mita & Schwartz, Lisa, 2005. "Ruling in and ruling out: Implications of molecular genetic diagnoses for disease classification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2536-2545, December.
    13. Marteau, Theresa M. & Weinman, John, 2006. "Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1360-1368, March.
    14. O'Doherty, Kieran C. & Burgess, Michael M. & Edwards, Kelly & Gallagher, Richard P. & Hawkins, Alice K. & Kaye, Jane & McCaffrey, Veronica & Winickoff, David E., 2011. "From consent to institutions: Designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 367-374, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:0030098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.