IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The genotype-phenotype map of an evolving digital organism

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A Fortuna
  • Luis Zaman
  • Charles Ofria
  • Andreas Wagner

Abstract

To understand how evolving systems bring forth novel and useful phenotypes, it is essential to understand the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic change. Artificial evolving systems can help us understand whether the genotype-phenotype maps of natural evolving systems are highly unusual, and it may help create evolvable artificial systems. Here we characterize the genotype-phenotype map of digital organisms in Avida, a platform for digital evolution. We consider digital organisms from a vast space of 10141 genotypes (instruction sequences), which can form 512 different phenotypes. These phenotypes are distinguished by different Boolean logic functions they can compute, as well as by the complexity of these functions. We observe several properties with parallels in natural systems, such as connected genotype networks and asymmetric phenotypic transitions. The likely common cause is robustness to genotypic change. We describe an intriguing tension between phenotypic complexity and evolvability that may have implications for biological evolution. On the one hand, genotypic change is more likely to yield novel phenotypes in more complex organisms. On the other hand, the total number of novel phenotypes reachable through genotypic change is highest for organisms with simple phenotypes. Artificial evolving systems can help us study aspects of biological evolvability that are not accessible in vastly more complex natural systems. They can also help identify properties, such as robustness, that are required for both human-designed artificial systems and synthetic biological systems to be evolvable.Author summary: The phenotype of an organism comprises the set of morphological and functional traits encoded by its genome. In natural evolving systems, phenotypes are organized into mutationally connected networks of genotypes, which increase the likelihood for an evolving population to encounter novel adaptive phenotypes (i.e., its evolvability). We do not know whether artificial systems, such as self-replicating and evolving computer programs—digital organisms—are more or less evolvable than natural systems. By studying how genotypes map onto phenotypes in digital organisms, we characterize many commonalities between natural and artificial evolving systems. In addition, we show that phenotypic complexity can both facilitate and constrain evolution, which harbors lessons not only for designing evolvable artificial systems, but also for synthetic biology.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A Fortuna & Luis Zaman & Charles Ofria & Andreas Wagner, 2017. "The genotype-phenotype map of an evolving digital organism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005414
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005414&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin C Frith & Neil F W Saunders & Bostjan Kobe & Timothy L Bailey, 2008. "Discovering Sequence Motifs with Arbitrary Insertions and Deletions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Sam F Greenbury & Steffen Schaper & Sebastian E Ahnert & Ard A Louis, 2016. "Genetic Correlations Greatly Increase Mutational Robustness and Can Both Reduce and Enhance Evolvability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. João F Matias Rodrigues & Andreas Wagner, 2009. "Evolutionary Plasticity and Innovations in Complex Metabolic Reaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Aditya Barve & Andreas Wagner, 2013. "A latent capacity for evolutionary innovation through exaptation in metabolic systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7461), pages 203-206, August.
    5. Richard E. Lenski & Charles Ofria & Travis C. Collier & Christoph Adami, 1999. "Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6745), pages 661-664, August.
    6. Walter Fontana & Peter Schuster, 1998. "Continuity in Evolution: On the Nature of Transition," Working Papers 98-04-030, Santa Fe Institute.
    7. W. Fontana & P. Schuster, 1998. "Shaping Space: The Possible and the Attainable in RNA Genotype-Phenotype Mapping," Working Papers ir98004, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    8. Jeremy A. Draghi & Todd L. Parsons & Günter P. Wagner & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2010. "Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7279), pages 353-355, January.
    9. W. Fontana & P. Schuster, 1998. "Continuity in Evolution: On the Nature of Transitions," Working Papers ir98039, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    10. Eric J. Hayden & Evandro Ferrada & Andreas Wagner, 2011. "Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme," Nature, Nature, vol. 474(7349), pages 92-95, June.
    11. Richard E. Lenski & Charles Ofria & Robert T. Pennock & Christoph Adami, 2003. "The evolutionary origin of complex features," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6936), pages 139-144, May.
    12. Yolanda Schaerli & Andreea Munteanu & Magüi Gili & James Cotterell & James Sharpe & Mark Isalan, 2014. "A unified design space of synthetic stripe-forming networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rigato, Emanuele & Fusco, Giuseppe, 2020. "A heuristic model of the effects of phenotypic robustness in adaptive evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 22-30.
    2. Jan Cupal & Stephan Kopp & Peter F. Stadler, 1999. "RNA Space Shape Technology," Working Papers 99-03-022, Santa Fe Institute.
    3. Tobias Sikosek & Erich Bornberg-Bauer & Hue Sun Chan, 2012. "Evolutionary Dynamics on Protein Bi-stability Landscapes can Potentially Resolve Adaptive Conflicts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Bårbel M. R. Stadler & Peter F. Stadler & Peter R. Wills, 2001. "Evolution in Systems of Ligation-Based Replicators," Working Papers 01-09-052, Santa Fe Institute.
    5. Rendel, Mark D., 2011. "Adaptive evolutionary walks require neutral intermediates in RNA fitness landscapes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 12-18.
    6. Christian M. Reidys & Peter F. Stadler, 1998. "Neutrality in Fitness Landscapes," Working Papers 98-10-089, Santa Fe Institute.
    7. Sam F Greenbury & Steffen Schaper & Sebastian E Ahnert & Ard A Louis, 2016. "Genetic Correlations Greatly Increase Mutational Robustness and Can Both Reduce and Enhance Evolvability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga & Djordje Bajić & Melisa L Osborne & Juan F Poyatos & Alvaro Sanchez, 2019. "High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-34, December.
    9. Krishnendu Chatterjee & Andreas Pavlogiannis & Ben Adlam & Martin A Nowak, 2014. "The Time Scale of Evolutionary Innovation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-7, September.
    10. James P. Crutchfield & Erik van Nimwegen, 1999. "The Evolutionary Unfolding of Complexity," Working Papers 99-02-015, Santa Fe Institute.
    11. Roger D Kouyos & Gabriel E Leventhal & Trevor Hinkley & Mojgan Haddad & Jeannette M Whitcomb & Christos J Petropoulos & Sebastian Bonhoeffer, 2012. "Exploring the Complexity of the HIV-1 Fitness Landscape," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    12. BŠrbel M. R. Stadler & Peter F. Stadler & Max Shpak & GŸnter P. Wagner, 2001. "Recombination Spaces, Metrics, and Pretopologies," Working Papers 01-02-011, Santa Fe Institute.
    13. Evandro Ferrada, 2014. "The Amino Acid Alphabet and the Architecture of the Protein Sequence-Structure Map. I. Binary Alphabets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Campos, Paulo R.A & Adami, Christoph & Wilke, Claus O, 2002. "Optimal adaptive performance and delocalization in NK fitness landscapes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 495-506.
    15. Teppo Felin & Stuart Kauffman & Roger Koppl & Giuseppe Longo, 2014. "Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality," Post-Print hal-01415115, HAL.
    16. Anthony V Furano & Charlie E Jones & Vipul Periwal & Kathryn E Callahan & Jean-Claude Walser & Pamela R Cook, 2020. "Cryptic genetic variation enhances primate L1 retrotransposon survival by enlarging the functional coiled coil sequence space of ORF1p," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Clark, James R. & Daines, Stuart J. & Lenton, Timothy M. & Watson, Andrew J. & Williams, Hywel T.P., 2011. "Individual-based modelling of adaptation in marine microbial populations using genetically defined physiological parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(23), pages 3823-3837.
    18. Javier Santos-Moreno & Eve Tasiudi & Hadiastri Kusumawardhani & Joerg Stelling & Yolanda Schaerli, 2023. "Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Anna Y. Alekseeva & Anneloes E. Groenenboom & Eddy J. Smid & Sijmen E. Schoustra, 2021. "Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbial Communities from Spontaneous Fermented Foods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Dimitris Iliopoulos & Arend Hintze & Christoph Adami, 2010. "Critical Dynamics in the Evolution of Stochastic Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.