IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamental Activity Constraints Lead to Specific Interpretations of the Connectome

Author

Listed:
  • Jannis Schuecker
  • Maximilian Schmidt
  • Sacha J van Albada
  • Markus Diesmann
  • Moritz Helias

Abstract

The continuous integration of experimental data into coherent models of the brain is an increasing challenge of modern neuroscience. Such models provide a bridge between structure and activity, and identify the mechanisms giving rise to experimental observations. Nevertheless, structurally realistic network models of spiking neurons are necessarily underconstrained even if experimental data on brain connectivity are incorporated to the best of our knowledge. Guided by physiological observations, any model must therefore explore the parameter ranges within the uncertainty of the data. Based on simulation results alone, however, the mechanisms underlying stable and physiologically realistic activity often remain obscure. We here employ a mean-field reduction of the dynamics, which allows us to include activity constraints into the process of model construction. We shape the phase space of a multi-scale network model of the vision-related areas of macaque cortex by systematically refining its connectivity. Fundamental constraints on the activity, i.e., prohibiting quiescence and requiring global stability, prove sufficient to obtain realistic layer- and area-specific activity. Only small adaptations of the structure are required, showing that the network operates close to an instability. The procedure identifies components of the network critical to its collective dynamics and creates hypotheses for structural data and future experiments. The method can be applied to networks involving any neuron model with a known gain function.Author Summary: The connectome describes the wiring patterns of the neurons in the brain, which form the substrate guiding activity through the network. The influence of its constituents on the dynamics is a central topic in systems neuroscience. We here investigate the critical role of specific structural links between neuronal populations for the global stability of cortex and elucidate the relation between anatomical structure and experimentally observed activity. Our novel framework enables the evaluation of the rapidly growing body of connectivity data on the basis of fundamental constraints on brain activity and the combination of anatomical and physiological data to form a consistent picture of cortical networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jannis Schuecker & Maximilian Schmidt & Sacha J van Albada & Markus Diesmann & Moritz Helias, 2017. "Fundamental Activity Constraints Lead to Specific Interpretations of the Connectome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005179
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005179&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Tetzlaff & Moritz Helias & Gaute T Einevoll & Markus Diesmann, 2012. "Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas H Hraha & Matthew J Westacott & Marina Pozzoli & Aleena M Notary & P Mason McClatchey & Richard K P Benninger, 2014. "Phase Transitions in the Multi-cellular Regulatory Behavior of Pancreatic Islet Excitability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    3. Vicente Reyes-Puerta & Suam Kim & Jyh-Jang Sun & Barbara Imbrosci & Werner Kilb & Heiko J Luhmann, 2015. "High Stimulus-Related Information in Barrel Cortex Inhibitory Interneurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Matthias Schultze-Kraft & Markus Diesmann & Sonja Grün & Moritz Helias, 2013. "Noise Suppression and Surplus Synchrony by Coincidence Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Moritz Helias & Tom Tetzlaff & Markus Diesmann, 2014. "The Correlation Structure of Local Neuronal Networks Intrinsically Results from Recurrent Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Takuya Ito & Scott L Brincat & Markus Siegel & Ravi D Mill & Biyu J He & Earl K Miller & Horacio G Rotstein & Michael W Cole, 2020. "Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-39, August.
    7. Hannah Bos & Markus Diesmann & Moritz Helias, 2016. "Identifying Anatomical Origins of Coexisting Oscillations in the Cortical Microcircuit," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-34, October.
    8. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Fereshteh Lagzi & Stefan Rotter, 2015. "Dynamics of Competition between Subnetworks of Spiking Neuronal Networks in the Balanced State," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Sadra Sadeh & Stefan Rotter, 2015. "Orientation Selectivity in Inhibition-Dominated Networks of Spiking Neurons: Effect of Single Neuron Properties and Network Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.
    12. Klas H Pettersen & Henrik Lindén & Tom Tetzlaff & Gaute T Einevoll, 2014. "Power Laws from Linear Neuronal Cable Theory: Power Spectral Densities of the Soma Potential, Soma Membrane Current and Single-Neuron Contribution to the EEG," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.