IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Measures of Integrated Information

Author

Listed:
  • Max Tegmark

Abstract

Although there is growing interest in measuring integrated information in computational and cognitive systems, current methods for doing so in practice are computationally unfeasible. Existing and novel integration measures are investigated and classified by various desirable properties. A simple taxonomy of Φ-measures is presented where they are each characterized by their choice of factorization method (5 options), choice of probability distributions to compare (3 × 4 options) and choice of measure for comparing probability distributions (7 options). When requiring the Φ-measures to satisfy a minimum of attractive properties, these hundreds of options reduce to a mere handful, some of which turn out to be identical. Useful exact and approximate formulas are derived that can be applied to real-world data from laboratory experiments without posing unreasonable computational demands.Author Summary: How can one determine whether an unresponsive patient is conscious or not? Of all the information processing in your brain that can be measured with modern sensors, which corresponds to information that you are subjectively aware of and which is unconscious? A theory that has garnered much recent attention proposes that the answer involves measuring a quantity called integration that quantifies the extent to which information is interconnected into a unified whole rather than split into disconnected parts. Unfortunately, proposed measures of integration are too slow to compute in practice from patient data. In this paper, I explore and classify existing and novel integration measures by various desirable properties, and derive useful exact and approximate formulas that can be applied to real-world data from laboratory experiments without posing unreasonable computational demands. This improves the prospects of making fascinating questions and theories about consciousness experimentally testable.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Tegmark, 2016. "Improved Measures of Integrated Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-34, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005123
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masafumi Oizumi & Larissa Albantakis & Giulio Tononi, 2014. "From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Masafumi Oizumi & Shun-ichi Amari & Toru Yanagawa & Naotaka Fujii & Naotsugu Tsuchiya, 2016. "Measuring Integrated Information from the Decoding Perspective," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Daniel Chicharro & Anders Ledberg, 2012. "When Two Become One: The Limits of Causality Analysis of Brain Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Jeffrey A Edlund & Nicolas Chaumont & Arend Hintze & Christof Koch & Giulio Tononi & Christoph Adami, 2011. "Integrated Information Increases with Fitness in the Evolution of Animats," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Adam B Barrett & Anil K Seth, 2011. "Practical Measures of Integrated Information for Time-Series Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Toker & Friedrich T Sommer, 2019. "Information integration in large brain networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. David Engel & Thomas W Malone, 2018. "Integrated information as a metric for group interaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Antonio J. Ibáñez-Molina & Sergio Iglesias-Parro, 2018. "A Comparison between Theoretical and Experimental Measures of Consciousness as Integrated Information in an Anatomically Based Network of Coupled Oscillators," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-8, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Engel & Thomas W Malone, 2018. "Integrated information as a metric for group interaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Antonio J. Ibáñez-Molina & Sergio Iglesias-Parro, 2018. "A Comparison between Theoretical and Experimental Measures of Consciousness as Integrated Information in an Anatomically Based Network of Coupled Oscillators," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-8, April.
    3. Takayuki Niizato & Kotaro Sakamoto & Yoh-ichi Mototake & Hisashi Murakami & Takenori Tomaru & Tomotaro Hoshika & Toshiki Fukushima, 2020. "Finding continuity and discontinuity in fish schools via integrated information theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Masafumi Oizumi & Shun-ichi Amari & Toru Yanagawa & Naotaka Fujii & Naotsugu Tsuchiya, 2016. "Measuring Integrated Information from the Decoding Perspective," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Daniel Toker & Friedrich T Sommer, 2019. "Information integration in large brain networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Masafumi Oizumi & Larissa Albantakis & Giulio Tononi, 2014. "From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Peter Gordon Roetzel, 2019. "Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework developmen," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 479-522, December.
    8. Adam B Barrett & Michael Murphy & Marie-Aurélie Bruno & Quentin Noirhomme & Mélanie Boly & Steven Laureys & Anil K Seth, 2012. "Granger Causality Analysis of Steady-State Electroencephalographic Signals during Propofol-Induced Anaesthesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. repec:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:4:p:31-41 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Soumya Banerjee, 2021. "Emergent rules of computation in the Universe lead to life and consciousness: a computational framework for consciousness," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(1), pages 31-41.
    11. Valmir C. Barbosa, 2017. "Information Integration from Distributed Threshold-Based Interactions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-14, January.
    12. Jeffrey A Edlund & Nicolas Chaumont & Arend Hintze & Christof Koch & Giulio Tononi & Christoph Adami, 2011. "Integrated Information Increases with Fitness in the Evolution of Animats," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Francisco J Esteban & Javier A Galadí & José A Langa & José R Portillo & Fernando Soler-Toscano, 2018. "Informational structures: A dynamical system approach for integrated information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, September.
    14. Antonino Casile & Rose T Faghih & Emery N Brown, 2021. "Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Brandon R. Munn & Eli J. Müller & Vicente Medel & Sharon L. Naismith & Joseph T. Lizier & Robert D. Sanders & James M. Shine, 2023. "Neuronal connected burst cascades bridge macroscale adaptive signatures across arousal states," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.