IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability and Competition in Multi-spike Models of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity

Author

Listed:
  • Baktash Babadi
  • L F Abbott

Abstract

Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) is a widespread plasticity mechanism in the nervous system. The simplest description of STDP only takes into account pairs of pre- and postsynaptic spikes, with potentiation of the synapse when a presynaptic spike precedes a postsynaptic spike and depression otherwise. In light of experiments that explored a variety of spike patterns, the pair-based STDP model has been augmented to account for multiple pre- and postsynaptic spike interactions. As a result, a number of different “multi-spike” STDP models have been proposed based on different experimental observations. The behavior of these models at the population level is crucial for understanding mechanisms of learning and memory. The challenging balance between the stability of a population of synapses and their competitive modification is well studied for pair-based models, but it has not yet been fully analyzed for multi-spike models. Here, we address this issue through numerical simulations of an integrate-and-fire model neuron with excitatory synapses subject to STDP described by three different proposed multi-spike models. We also analytically calculate average synaptic changes and fluctuations about these averages. Our results indicate that the different multi-spike models behave quite differently at the population level. Although each model can produce synaptic competition in certain parameter regions, none of them induces synaptic competition with its originally fitted parameters. The dichotomy between synaptic stability and Hebbian competition, which is well characterized for pair-based STDP models, persists in multi-spike models. However, anti-Hebbian competition can coexist with synaptic stability in some models. We propose that the collective behavior of synaptic plasticity models at the population level should be used as an additional guideline in applying phenomenological models based on observations of single synapses.Author Summary: Synaptic plasticity is believed to underlie learning and memory by competitive strengthening and weakening of synapses in neural networks. However, the ability to form new memories while maintaining the old ones involves an intricate balance between synaptic stability and competition. In one of the most widespread such mechanisms, spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), the temporal order of pre- and postsynaptic spiking across a synapse determines whether it is strengthened or weakened. Early description of STDP only took into account pairs of pre- and postsynaptic spikes. However, more recent experimental results showed that the “pair-based” description is not sufficient to fully account for synaptic modifications under STDP, and motivated more complex “multi-spike” STDP models. While the conditions under which the pair-based STDP leads to synaptic stability and/or competition are well studied, it is not clear when and how multi-spike STDP models lead to synaptic stability and competition. Here, we address these questions through numerical simulation and analysis of a population of plastic excitatory synapses that converge to a neuron. We show that different multi-spike STDP models can induce synaptic stability and competition under radically different conditions, which have important implications in relating learning and memory to biophysical properties of synapses.

Suggested Citation

  • Baktash Babadi & L F Abbott, 2016. "Stability and Competition in Multi-spike Models of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004750
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004750&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gina G. Turrigiano & Kenneth R. Leslie & Niraj S. Desai & Lana C. Rutherford & Sacha B. Nelson, 1998. "Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6670), pages 892-896, February.
    2. Sen Song & Per Jesper Sjöström & Markus Reigl & Sacha Nelson & Dmitri B Chklovskii, 2005. "Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-1, March.
    3. Robert C. Froemke & Mu-ming Poo & Yang Dan, 2005. "Spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity depends on dendritic location," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7030), pages 221-225, March.
    4. Robert C. Froemke & Yang Dan, 2002. "Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6879), pages 433-438, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jimok Kim & Richard W Tsien & Bradley E Alger, 2012. "An Improved Test for Detecting Multiplicative Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Christoph Hartmann & Andreea Lazar & Bernhard Nessler & Jochen Triesch, 2015. "Where’s the Noise? Key Features of Spontaneous Activity and Neural Variability Arise through Learning in a Deterministic Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-35, December.
    3. Pierre Yger & Kenneth D Harris, 2013. "The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Giulia Faini & Dimitrii Tanese & Clément Molinier & Cécile Telliez & Massilia Hamdani & Francois Blot & Christophe Tourain & Vincent Sars & Filippo Bene & Benoît C. Forget & Emiliano Ronzitti & Valent, 2023. "Ultrafast light targeting for high-throughput precise control of neuronal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Matteo Saponati & Martin Vinck, 2023. "Sequence anticipation and spike-timing-dependent plasticity emerge from a predictive learning rule," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Niranjan Chakravarthy & Shivkumar Sabesan & Kostas Tsakalis & Leon Iasemidis, 2009. "Controlling epileptic seizures in a neural mass model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 98-116, January.
    7. Damien M O’Halloran, 2020. "Simulation model of CA1 pyramidal neurons reveal opposing roles for the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current and Ca2+-activated K+ current during spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang & Deng, Bin & Wei, Xile, 2015. "Spike coherence and synchronization on Newman–Watts small-world neuronal networks modulated by spike-timing-dependent plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 307-317.
    9. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    10. Yanyun Ren & Xiaobo Bu & Ming Wang & Yue Gong & Junjie Wang & Yuyang Yang & Guijun Li & Meng Zhang & Ye Zhou & Su-Ting Han, 2022. "Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Dean J. Kareemo & Christina S. Winborn & Samantha S. Olah & Carley N. Miller & JungMin Kim & Chelsie A. Kadgien & Hannah S. Actor-Engel & Harrison J. Ramsay & Austin M. Ramsey & Jason Aoto & Matthew J, 2024. "Genetically encoded intrabody probes for labeling and manipulating AMPA-type glutamate receptors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Christian Keck & Cristina Savin & Jörg Lücke, 2012. "Feedforward Inhibition and Synaptic Scaling – Two Sides of the Same Coin?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Iris Reuveni & Sourav Ghosh & Edi Barkai, 2017. "Real Time Multiplicative Memory Amplification Mediated by Whole-Cell Scaling of Synaptic Response in Key Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.
    14. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    15. Julijana Gjorgjieva & Taro Toyoizumi & Stephen J Eglen, 2009. "Burst-Time-Dependent Plasticity Robustly Guides ON/OFF Segregation in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    17. Giorgia Dellaferrera & Stanisław Woźniak & Giacomo Indiveri & Angeliki Pantazi & Evangelos Eleftheriou, 2022. "Introducing principles of synaptic integration in the optimization of deep neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Vladimir V Klinshov & Jun-nosuke Teramae & Vladimir I Nekorkin & Tomoki Fukai, 2014. "Dense Neuron Clustering Explains Connectivity Statistics in Cortical Microcircuits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Barbara Feulner & Matthew G. Perich & Raeed H. Chowdhury & Lee E. Miller & Juan A. Gallego & Claudia Clopath, 2022. "Small, correlated changes in synaptic connectivity may facilitate rapid motor learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Aseel Shomar & Lukas Geyrhofer & Noam E Ziv & Naama Brenner, 2017. "Cooperative stochastic binding and unbinding explain synaptic size dynamics and statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.