IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory Storage Fidelity in the Hippocampal Circuit: The Role of Subregions and Input Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten Neher
  • Sen Cheng
  • Laurenz Wiskott

Abstract

In the last decades a standard model regarding the function of the hippocampus in memory formation has been established and tested computationally. It has been argued that the CA3 region works as an auto-associative memory and that its recurrent fibers are the actual storing place of the memories. Furthermore, to work properly CA3 requires memory patterns that are mutually uncorrelated. It has been suggested that the dentate gyrus orthogonalizes the patterns before storage, a process known as pattern separation. In this study we review the model when random input patterns are presented for storage and investigate whether it is capable of storing patterns of more realistic entorhinal grid cell input. Surprisingly, we find that an auto-associative CA3 net is redundant for random inputs up to moderate noise levels and is only beneficial at high noise levels. When grid cell input is presented, auto-association is even harmful for memory performance at all levels. Furthermore, we find that Hebbian learning in the dentate gyrus does not support its function as a pattern separator. These findings challenge the standard framework and support an alternative view where the simpler EC-CA1-EC network is sufficient for memory storage.Author Summary: It is well known that the hippocampus, a mammalian brain region, has a crucial role in memory formation. Furthermore, it has a remarkable anatomical structure and can be divided into several subregions based on physiological properties. Over the last decades a widely accepted model has evolved suggesting individual roles for each subregion in memory storage. The central idea is that region CA3, with its remarkably many synapses that project into the region itself again, stores the memories within these synapses. In this model a memory is impressed onto the hippocampus by neuronal activation in the hippocampal input region. Recently it has been found that such activations have a certain regularity instead of being random as assumed in the standard model. Here we investigate how well the model performs when storing memories of regular inputs. We find that the proposed function of CA3 actually harms memory performance. Moreover, we show that this function is redundant even in the case of random inputs. These findings call the standard model into question and support an alternative view of how the hippocampus may store memories.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten Neher & Sen Cheng & Laurenz Wiskott, 2015. "Memory Storage Fidelity in the Hippocampal Circuit: The Role of Subregions and Input Statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Fyhn & Torkel Hafting & Alessandro Treves & May-Britt Moser & Edvard I. Moser, 2007. "Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7132), pages 190-194, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabella C. Wagner & Luise P. Graichen & Boryana Todorova & Andre Lüttig & David B. Omer & Matthias Stangl & Claus Lamm, 2023. "Entorhinal grid-like codes and time-locked network dynamics track others navigating through space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Taylor J. Malone & Nai-Wen Tien & Yan Ma & Lian Cui & Shangru Lyu & Garret Wang & Duc Nguyen & Kai Zhang & Maxym V. Myroshnychenko & Jean Tyan & Joshua A. Gordon & David A. Kupferschmidt & Yi Gu, 2024. "A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Kyerl Park & Yoonsoo Yeo & Kisung Shin & Jeehyun Kwag, 2024. "Egocentric neural representation of geometric vertex in the retrosplenial cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Allen Cheung & David Ball & Michael Milford & Gordon Wyeth & Janet Wiles, 2012. "Maintaining a Cognitive Map in Darkness: The Need to Fuse Boundary Knowledge with Path Integration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Trygve Solstad & Hosam N Yousif & Terrence J Sejnowski, 2014. "Place Cell Rate Remapping by CA3 Recurrent Collaterals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    6. Torsten Neher & Amir Hossein Azizi & Sen Cheng, 2017. "From grid cells to place cells with realistic field sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Francis Kei Masuda & Emily A. Aery Jones & Yanjun Sun & Lisa M. Giocomo, 2023. "Ketamine evoked disruption of entorhinal and hippocampal spatial maps," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Tiziano D’Albis & Richard Kempter, 2017. "A single-cell spiking model for the origin of grid-cell patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-41, October.
    9. Yue-Qing Zhou & Vyash Puliyadi & Xiaojing Chen & Joonhee Leo Lee & Lan-Yuan Zhang & James J. Knierim, 2024. "Vector coding and place coding in hippocampus share a common directional signal," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Axel Kammerer & Christian Leibold, 2014. "Hippocampal Remapping Is Constrained by Sparseness rather than Capacity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Benjamin Dunn & Maria Mørreaunet & Yasser Roudi, 2015. "Correlations and Functional Connections in a Population of Grid Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Lajos Vágó & Balázs B Ujfalussy, 2018. "Robust and efficient coding with grid cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.
    13. Sandro Romani & Misha Tsodyks, 2010. "Continuous Attractors with Morphed/Correlated Maps," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.