IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Dimensionality Reduction Reveals Independent Encoding of Motor Features in a Muscle Synergy for Insect Flight Control

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Sponberg
  • Thomas L Daniel
  • Adrienne L Fairhall

Abstract

What are the features of movement encoded by changing motor commands? Do motor commands encode movement independently or can they be represented in a reduced set of signals (i.e. synergies)? Motor encoding poses a computational and practical challenge because many muscles typically drive movement, and simultaneous electrophysiology recordings of all motor commands are typically not available. Moreover, during a single locomotor period (a stride or wingstroke) the variation in movement may have high dimensionality, even if only a few discrete signals activate the muscles. Here, we apply the method of partial least squares (PLS) to extract the encoded features of movement based on the cross-covariance of motor signals and movement. PLS simultaneously decomposes both datasets and identifies only the variation in movement that relates to the specific muscles of interest. We use this approach to explore how the main downstroke flight muscles of an insect, the hawkmoth Manduca sexta, encode torque during yaw turns. We simultaneously record muscle activity and turning torque in tethered flying moths experiencing wide-field visual stimuli. We ask whether this pair of muscles acts as a muscle synergy (a single linear combination of activity) consistent with their hypothesized function of producing a left-right power differential. Alternatively, each muscle might individually encode variation in movement. We show that PLS feature analysis produces an efficient reduction of dimensionality in torque variation within a wingstroke. At first, the two muscles appear to behave as a synergy when we consider only their wingstroke-averaged torque. However, when we consider the PLS features, the muscles reveal independent encoding of torque. Using these features we can predictably reconstruct the variation in torque corresponding to changes in muscle activation. PLS-based feature analysis provides a general two-sided dimensionality reduction that reveals encoding in high dimensional sensory or motor transformations.Author Summary: Understanding movement control is challenging because the brains of nearly all animals send motor command signals to many muscles, and these signals produce complex movements. In studying animal movement, one cannot always record all the motor commands an animal uses or know all the ways in which movement varies in response. A combined approach is necessary to find the relevant patterns: the changes in movement that correspond to changes in the recorded motor commands. Techniques exist to identify simple patterns in either the motor commands or the movements, but in this paper we develop an approach that identifies patterns in both simultaneously. We use this technique to understand how agile flying insects control aerial turns. The two main downstroke muscles of moths are thought to produce turns by creating a power difference between the left and right wings. The moth’s brain may only need to specify the difference in activation between the two muscles. We discover that moth’s brain actually has independent control over each muscle, and this separate control increases the moth’s ability to adjust turning within a single wingstroke. Our computational approach reveals sophisticated patterns of movement processing even in the small nervous systems of insects.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Sponberg & Thomas L Daniel & Adrienne L Fairhall, 2015. "Dual Dimensionality Reduction Reveals Independent Encoding of Motor Features in a Muscle Synergy for Insect Flight Control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004168
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004168&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark M. Churchland & John P. Cunningham & Matthew T. Kaufman & Justin D. Foster & Paul Nuyujukian & Stephen I. Ryu & Krishna V. Shenoy, 2012. "Neural population dynamics during reaching," Nature, Nature, vol. 487(7405), pages 51-56, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanaya N. Shroff & Eric Lowet & Sudiksha Sridhar & Howard J. Gritton & Mohammed Abumuaileq & Hua-An Tseng & Cyrus Cheung & Samuel L. Zhou & Krishnakanth Kondabolu & Xue Han, 2023. "Striatal cholinergic interneuron membrane voltage tracks locomotor rhythms in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Shan Yu & Andreas Klaus & Hongdian Yang & Dietmar Plenz, 2014. "Scale-Invariant Neuronal Avalanche Dynamics and the Cut-Off in Size Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Ian S Howard & David W Franklin, 2015. "Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Pierre O. Boucher & Tian Wang & Laura Carceroni & Gary Kane & Krishna V. Shenoy & Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, 2023. "Initial conditions combine with sensory evidence to induce decision-related dynamics in premotor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Eric A. Kirk & Keenan T. Hope & Samuel J. Sober & Britton A. Sauerbrei, 2024. "An output-null signature of inertial load in motor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Adrian M Haith & David M Huberdeau & John W Krakauer, 2015. "Hedging Your Bets: Intermediate Movements as Optimal Behavior in the Context of an Incomplete Decision," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Nir Even-Chen & Blue Sheffer & Saurabh Vyas & Stephen I Ryu & Krishna V Shenoy, 2019. "Structure and variability of delay activity in premotor cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Josh Merel & Donald M Pianto & John P Cunningham & Liam Paninski, 2015. "Encoder-Decoder Optimization for Brain-Computer Interfaces," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Hagai Lalazar & L F Abbott & Eilon Vaadia, 2016. "Tuning Curves for Arm Posture Control in Motor Cortex Are Consistent with Random Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Edward A. B. Horrocks & Fabio R. Rodrigues & Aman B. Saleem, 2024. "Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Benjamin R Cowley & Matthew A Smith & Adam Kohn & Byron M Yu, 2016. "Stimulus-Driven Population Activity Patterns in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Sravani Kondapavulur & Stefan M. Lemke & David Darevsky & Ling Guo & Preeya Khanna & Karunesh Ganguly, 2022. "Transition from predictable to variable motor cortex and striatal ensemble patterning during behavioral exploration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Katarzyna Jurewicz & Brianna J. Sleezer & Priyanka S. Mehta & Benjamin Y. Hayden & R. Becket Ebitz, 2024. "Irrational choices via a curvilinear representational geometry for value," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Akshay Markanday & Sungho Hong & Junya Inoue & Erik Schutter & Peter Thier, 2023. "Multidimensional cerebellar computations for flexible kinematic control of movements," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. David Kappel & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "STDP Installs in Winner-Take-All Circuits an Online Approximation to Hidden Markov Model Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Tanner C Dixon & Christina M Merrick & Joni D Wallis & Richard B Ivry & Jose M Carmena, 2021. "Hybrid dedicated and distributed coding in PMd/M1 provides separation and interaction of bilateral arm signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, November.
    18. Svenja Melbaum & Eleonora Russo & David Eriksson & Artur Schneider & Daniel Durstewitz & Thomas Brox & Ilka Diester, 2022. "Conserved structures of neural activity in sensorimotor cortex of freely moving rats allow cross-subject decoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Yuangen Yao & Haiyou Deng & Chengzhang Ma & Ming Yi & Jun Ma, 2017. "Impact of Bounded Noise and Rewiring on the Formation and Instability of Spiral Waves in a Small-World Network of Hodgkin-Huxley Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Satohiro Tajima & Toru Yanagawa & Naotaka Fujii & Taro Toyoizumi, 2015. "Untangling Brain-Wide Dynamics in Consciousness by Cross-Embedding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.