IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Protein-Peptide Binding Specificity through Computational Peptide Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Arnab Bhattacherjee
  • Stefan Wallin

Abstract

The binding of short disordered peptide stretches to globular protein domains is important for a wide range of cellular processes, including signal transduction, protein transport, and immune response. The often promiscuous nature of these interactions and the conformational flexibility of the peptide chain, sometimes even when bound, make the binding specificity of this type of protein interaction a challenge to understand. Here we develop and test a Monte Carlo-based procedure for calculating protein-peptide binding thermodynamics for many sequences in a single run. The method explores both peptide sequence and conformational space simultaneously by simulating a joint probability distribution which, in particular, makes searching through peptide sequence space computationally efficient. To test our method, we apply it to 3 different peptide-binding protein domains and test its ability to capture the experimentally determined specificity profiles. Insight into the molecular underpinnings of the observed specificities is obtained by analyzing the peptide conformational ensembles of a large number of binding-competent sequences. We also explore the possibility of using our method to discover new peptide-binding pockets on protein structures.Author Summary: The interactions between proteins play a crucial role for almost every undertaking of a cell. Many of these interactions are mediated by the binding of relatively short unstructured polypeptide segments, or peptides, in one protein to well-folded domains in other proteins. Such protein-peptide interactions have some interesting and special properties, e.g., promiscuity, which means many different peptide sequences are able to bind the same protein domain. Peptides also often exhibit structural flexibility even after binding a protein. These special properties make it desirable, but also challenging, to simulate protein-peptide binding in atomistic detail for many different peptide sequences. To this end, we have developed a computational algorithm that simultaneously explores the structure of protein-peptide complexes and the amino acid sequences of the peptide. In particular, our algorithm allows binding-competent peptide sequences to be generated in direct relation to their binding strengths. We also explored the possibility of using our method to locate new peptide-binding pockets on protein structures. Computational algorithms such as the one developed here may pave the way to reveal the full complexity of protein-protein interaction networks used in cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnab Bhattacherjee & Stefan Wallin, 2013. "Exploring Protein-Peptide Binding Specificity through Computational Peptide Screening," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003277
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003277&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iskra Staneva & Stefan Wallin, 2011. "Binding Free Energy Landscape of Domain-Peptide Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Iskra Staneva & Yongqi Huang & Zhirong Liu & Stefan Wallin, 2012. "Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Evangelia Petsalaki & Alexander Stark & Eduardo GarcĂ­a-Urdiales & Robert B Russell, 2009. "Accurate Prediction of Peptide Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Ali Zarrinpar & Sang-Hyun Park & Wendell A. Lim, 2003. "Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6967), pages 676-680, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luhao Zhang & Maodong Li & Zhirong Liu, 2018. "A comprehensive ensemble model for comparing the allosteric effect of ordered and disordered proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Vaitea Opuu & Giuliano Nigro & Thomas Gaillard & Emmanuelle Schmitt & Yves Mechulam & Thomas Simonson, 2020. "Adaptive landscape flattening allows the design of both enzyme: Substrate binding and catalytic power," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iskra Staneva & Yongqi Huang & Zhirong Liu & Stefan Wallin, 2012. "Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Xinyi Liu & Bin Liu & Zhimin Huang & Ting Shi & Yingyi Chen & Jian Zhang, 2012. "SPPS: A Sequence-Based Method for Predicting Probability of Protein-Protein Interaction Partners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Iskra Staneva & Stefan Wallin, 2011. "Binding Free Energy Landscape of Domain-Peptide Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Mahdi Sarmady & William Dampier & Aydin Tozeren, 2011. "Sequence- and Interactome-Based Prediction of Viral Protein Hotspots Targeting Host Proteins: A Case Study for HIV Nef," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Elisabeth L Humphris & Tanja Kortemme, 2007. "Design of Multi-Specificity in Protein Interfaces," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.