IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sparse Coding Can Predict Primary Visual Cortex Receptive Field Changes Induced by Abnormal Visual Input

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan J Hunt
  • Peter Dayan
  • Geoffrey J Goodhill

Abstract

Receptive fields acquired through unsupervised learning of sparse representations of natural scenes have similar properties to primary visual cortex (V1) simple cell receptive fields. However, what drives in vivo development of receptive fields remains controversial. The strongest evidence for the importance of sensory experience in visual development comes from receptive field changes in animals reared with abnormal visual input. However, most sparse coding accounts have considered only normal visual input and the development of monocular receptive fields. Here, we applied three sparse coding models to binocular receptive field development across six abnormal rearing conditions. In every condition, the changes in receptive field properties previously observed experimentally were matched to a similar and highly faithful degree by all the models, suggesting that early sensory development can indeed be understood in terms of an impetus towards sparsity. As previously predicted in the literature, we found that asymmetries in inter-ocular correlation across orientations lead to orientation-specific binocular receptive fields. Finally we used our models to design a novel stimulus that, if present during rearing, is predicted by the sparsity principle to lead robustly to radically abnormal receptive fields.Author Summary: The responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1), a region of the brain involved in encoding visual input, are modified by the visual experience of the animal during development. For example, most neurons in animals reared viewing stripes of a particular orientation only respond to the orientation that the animal experienced. The responses of V1 cells in normal animals are similar to responses that simple optimisation algorithms can learn when trained on images. However, whether the similarity between these algorithms and V1 responses is merely coincidental has been unclear. Here, we used the results of a number of experiments where animals were reared with modified visual experience to test the explanatory power of three related optimisation algorithms. We did this by filtering the images for the algorithms in ways that mimicked the visual experience of the animals. This allowed us to show that the changes in V1 responses in experiment were consistent with the algorithms. This is evidence that the precepts of the algorithms, notably sparsity, can be used to understand the development of V1 responses. Further, we used our model to propose a novel rearing condition which we expect to have a dramatic effect on development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan J Hunt & Peter Dayan & Geoffrey J Goodhill, 2013. "Sparse Coding Can Predict Primary Visual Cortex Receptive Field Changes Induced by Abnormal Visual Input," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003005&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Savin & Prashant Joshi & Jochen Triesch, 2010. "Independent Component Analysis in Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Marsaglia, George & Tsang, Wai Wan & Wang, Jingbo, 2003. "Evaluating Kolmogorov's Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 8(i18).
    3. Ruben Coen-Cagli & Peter Dayan & Odelia Schwartz, 2012. "Cortical Surround Interactions and Perceptual Salience via Natural Scene Statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Evan C. Smith & Michael S. Lewicki, 2006. "Efficient auditory coding," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7079), pages 978-982, February.
    5. Peter C. Kind & Donald E. Mitchell & Bashir Ahmed & Colin Blakemore & Tobias Bonhoeffer & Frank Sengpiel, 2002. "Correlated binocular activity guides recovery from monocular deprivation," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6879), pages 430-433, March.
    6. Jan Eichhorn & Fabian Sinz & Matthias Bethge, 2009. "Natural Image Coding in V1: How Much Use Is Orientation Selectivity?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Leonard E. White & David M. Coppola & David Fitzpatrick, 2001. "The contribution of sensory experience to the maturation of orientation selectivity in ferret visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6841), pages 1049-1052, June.
    8. Aniruddha Das & Charles D. Gilbert, 1999. "Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6737), pages 655-661, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Warne, Anders, 2023. "DSGE model forecasting: rational expectations vs. adaptive learning," Working Paper Series 2768, European Central Bank.
    2. Fernández de Marcos Giménez de los Galanes, Alberto, 2022. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35324, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    3. Sloot Henrik, 2022. "Implementing Markovian models for extendible Marshall–Olkin distributions," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 308-343, January.
    4. Tatjana Miljkovic & Saleem Shaik & Dragan Miljkovic, 2017. "Redefining standards for body mass index of the US population based on BRFSS data using mixtures," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 197-211, January.
    5. Noga Mosheiff & Haggai Agmon & Avraham Moriel & Yoram Burak, 2017. "An efficient coding theory for a dynamic trajectory predicts non-uniform allocation of entorhinal grid cells to modules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Jos'e Miguel Flores-Contr'o, 2024. "The Gerber-Shiu Expected Discounted Penalty Function: An Application to Poverty Trapping," Papers 2402.11715, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    7. Steland, Ansgar, 2020. "Testing and estimating change-points in the covariance matrix of a high-dimensional time series," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Enrique Garcia Tejeda, 2022. "La concentracion espacial de los reportes de disparos al 911 en la Ciudad de Mexico: ¿Comportamiento racional en el uso de armas durante la pandemia Covid-19?," Sobre México. Revista de Economía, Sobre México. Temas en economía, vol. 3(5), pages 69-93.
    9. Carvalho, Luis, 2015. "An Improved Evaluation of Kolmogorovs Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(c03).
    10. Guillaume Coqueret, 2016. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02088097, HAL.
    11. Sam V Norman-Haignere & Josh H McDermott, 2018. "Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-46, December.
    12. Hui Xuan Tan & Ephrance Abu Ujum & Kwai Fatt Choong & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2015. "Impact analysis of domestic and international research collaborations: a Malaysian case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 885-904, January.
    13. Sinz, Fabian H. & Lies, Jörn-Philipp & Gerwinn, Sebastian & Bethge, Matthias, 2014. "Natter: A Python Natural Image Statistics Toolbox," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i05).
    14. Zhong Li & Chen Wu & Qi Han & Mingyang Hou & Guorong Chen & Tengfei Weng, 2022. "CASI-Net: A Novel and Effect Steel Surface Defect Classification Method Based on Coordinate Attention and Self-Interaction Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Fernández-de-Marcos, Alberto & García-Portugués, Eduardo, 2023. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Vladimir Klimchenko & Andrei Torgashov & Yuri A. W. Shardt & Fan Yang, 2021. "Multi-Output Soft Sensor with a Multivariate Filter That Predicts Errors Applied to an Industrial Reactive Distillation Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Steven E. Pav, 2014. "Bounds on Portfolio Quality," Papers 1409.5936, arXiv.org.
    18. Ghosh, Sayantan & Manimaran, P. & Panigrahi, Prasanta K., 2011. "Characterizing multi-scale self-similar behavior and non-statistical properties of fluctuations in financial time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4304-4316.
    19. Nayara Luiz Pires & Daphne Heloisa de Freitas Muniz & Tiago Borges Kisaka & Nathan De Castro Soares Simplicio & Lilian Bortoluzzi & Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima & Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho, 2015. "Impacts of the Urbanization Process on Water Quality of Brazilian Savanna Rivers: The Case of Preto River in Formosa, Goiás State, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Guillaume Coqueret, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02000726, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.