IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking?

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan B Dingwell
  • Joby John
  • Joseph P Cusumano

Abstract

It is widely accepted that humans and animals minimize energetic cost while walking. While such principles predict average behavior, they do not explain the variability observed in walking. For robust performance, walking movements must adapt at each step, not just on average. Here, we propose an analytical framework that reconciles issues of optimality, redundancy, and stochasticity. For human treadmill walking, we defined a goal function to formulate a precise mathematical definition of one possible control strategy: maintain constant speed at each stride. We recorded stride times and stride lengths from healthy subjects walking at five speeds. The specified goal function yielded a decomposition of stride-to-stride variations into new gait variables explicitly related to achieving the hypothesized strategy. Subjects exhibited greatly decreased variability for goal-relevant gait fluctuations directly related to achieving this strategy, but far greater variability for goal-irrelevant fluctuations. More importantly, humans immediately corrected goal-relevant deviations at each successive stride, while allowing goal-irrelevant deviations to persist across multiple strides. To demonstrate that this was not the only strategy people could have used to successfully accomplish the task, we created three surrogate data sets. Each tested a specific alternative hypothesis that subjects used a different strategy that made no reference to the hypothesized goal function. Humans did not adopt any of these viable alternative strategies. Finally, we developed a sequence of stochastic control models of stride-to-stride variability for walking, based on the Minimum Intervention Principle. We demonstrate that healthy humans are not precisely “optimal,” but instead consistently slightly over-correct small deviations in walking speed at each stride. Our results reveal a new governing principle for regulating stride-to-stride fluctuations in human walking that acts independently of, but in parallel with, minimizing energetic cost. Thus, humans exploit task redundancies to achieve robust control while minimizing effort and allowing potentially beneficial motor variability.Author Summary: Existing principles used to explain how locomotion is controlled predict average, long-term behavior. However, neuromuscular noise continuously disrupts these movements, presenting a significant challenge for the nervous system. One possibility is that the nervous system must overcome all neuromuscular variability as a constraint limiting performance. Conversely, we show that humans walking on a treadmill exploit redundancy to adjust stepping movements at each stride and maintain performance. This strategy is not required by the task itself, but is predicted by appropriate stochastic control models. Thus, the nervous system simplifies control by strongly regulating goal-relevant fluctuations, while largely ignoring non-essential variations. Properly determining how stochasticity affects control is critical to developing biological models, since neuro-motor fluctuations are intrinsic to these systems. Our work unifies the perspectives of time series analysis researchers, motor coordination researchers, and motor control theorists by providing a single dynamical framework for studying variability in the context of goal-directedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan B Dingwell & Joby John & Joseph P Cusumano, 2010. "Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000856
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000856&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evren C. Tumer & Michael S. Brainard, 2007. "Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7173), pages 1240-1244, December.
    2. Leslie C. Osborne & Stephen G. Lisberger & William Bialek, 2005. "A sensory source for motor variation," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7057), pages 412-416, September.
    3. Manoj Srinivasan & Andy Ruina, 2006. "Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7072), pages 72-75, January.
    4. Costa, M. & Peng, C.-K. & L. Goldberger, Ary & Hausdorff, Jeffrey M., 2003. "Multiscale entropy analysis of human gait dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 330(1), pages 53-60.
    5. Gates, Deanna H. & Su, Jimmy L. & Dingwell, Jonathan B., 2007. "Possible biomechanical origins of the long-range correlations in stride intervals of walking," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 259-270.
    6. Christopher M. Harris & Daniel M. Wolpert, 1998. "Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6695), pages 780-784, August.
    7. Martin Golubitsky & Ian Stewart & Pietro-Luciano Buono & J. J. Collins, 1999. "Symmetry in locomotor central pattern generators and animal gaits," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6754), pages 693-695, October.
    8. Konrad P. Körding & Daniel M. Wolpert, 2004. "Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6971), pages 244-247, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan B Dingwell & Joseph P Cusumano, 2019. "Humans use multi-objective control to regulate lateral foot placement when walking," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Marietta Kirchner & Patric Schubert & Magnus Liebherr & Christian T Haas, 2014. "Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Adaptive Fractal Analysis of Stride Time Data in Parkinson's Disease: Stitching Together Short Gait Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Joby John & Jonathan B Dingwell & Joseph P Cusumano, 2016. "Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Steven H Collins & Arthur D Kuo, 2013. "Two Independent Contributions to Step Variability during Over-Ground Human Walking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-1, August.
    5. Julius Verrel & Didier Pradon & Nicolas Vuillerme, 2012. "Persistence of Motor-Equivalent Postural Fluctuations during Bipedal Quiet Standing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-8, October.
    6. Joshua G A Cashaback & Christopher K Lao & Dimitrios J Palidis & Susan K Coltman & Heather R McGregor & Paul L Gribble, 2019. "The gradient of the reinforcement landscape influences sensorimotor learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth W. Egger & Stephen G. Lisberger, 2022. "Neural structure of a sensory decoder for motor control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Nidhi Seethapathi & Barrett C. Clark & Manoj Srinivasan, 2024. "Exploration-based learning of a stabilizing controller predicts locomotor adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Kang He & You Liang & Farnaz Abdollahi & Moria Fisher Bittmann & Konrad Kording & Kunlin Wei, 2016. "The Statistical Determinants of the Speed of Motor Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Shih-Wei Wu & Maria F Dal Martello & Laurence T Maloney, 2009. "Sub-Optimal Allocation of Time in Sequential Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Marin-Lopez, A. & Martínez-Cadena, J.A. & Martinez-Martinez, F. & Alvarez-Ramirez, J., 2023. "Surrogate multivariate Hurst exponent analysis of gait dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Vassilios N Christopoulos & Paul R Schrater, 2009. "Grasping Objects with Environmentally Induced Position Uncertainty," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Ian H Stevenson & Hugo L Fernandes & Iris Vilares & Kunlin Wei & Konrad P Körding, 2009. "Bayesian Integration and Non-Linear Feedback Control in a Full-Body Motor Task," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Paolo Tommasino & Antonella Maselli & Domenico Campolo & Francesco Lacquaniti & Andrea d’Avella, 2021. "A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-32, June.
    9. Matteo Bertucco & Nasir H Bhanpuri & Terence D Sanger, 2015. "Perceived Cost and Intrinsic Motor Variability Modulate the Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Dagmar Sternad & Masaki O Abe & Xiaogang Hu & Hermann Müller, 2011. "Neuromotor Noise, Error Tolerance and Velocity-Dependent Costs in Skilled Performance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Todd E Hudson & Laurence T Maloney & Michael S Landy, 2008. "Optimal Compensation for Temporal Uncertainty in Movement Planning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-9, July.
    12. Shogo Yonekura & Yasuo Kuniyoshi, 2017. "Bodily motion fluctuation improves reaching success rate in a neurophysical agent via geometric-stochastic resonance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Max Berniker & Megan K O’Brien & Konrad P Kording & Alaa A Ahmed, 2013. "An Examination of the Generalizability of Motor Costs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    14. Leopold Zizlsperger & Thomas Sauvigny & Thomas Haarmeier, 2012. "Selective Attention Increases Choice Certainty in Human Decision Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    15. Xu, Meng & Shang, Pengjian, 2018. "Analysis of financial time series using multiscale entropy based on skewness and kurtosis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1543-1550.
    16. Geonhui Lee & Woong Choi & Hanjin Jo & Wookhyun Park & Jaehyo Kim, 2020. "Analysis of motor control strategy for frontal and sagittal planes of circular tracking movements using visual feedback noise from velocity change and depth information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Kenta Tominaga & André Lee & Eckart Altenmüller & Fumio Miyazaki & Shinichi Furuya, 2016. "Kinematic Origins of Motor Inconsistency in Expert Pianists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Lionel Rigoux & Emmanuel Guigon, 2012. "A Model of Reward- and Effort-Based Optimal Decision Making and Motor Control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Caroline Haimerl & Douglas A. Ruff & Marlene R. Cohen & Cristina Savin & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2023. "Targeted V1 comodulation supports task-adaptive sensory decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.