IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noise Management by Molecular Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Frank J Bruggeman
  • Nils Blüthgen
  • Hans V Westerhoff

Abstract

Fluctuations in the copy number of key regulatory macromolecules (“noise”) may cause physiological heterogeneity in populations of (isogenic) cells. The kinetics of processes and their wiring in molecular networks can modulate this molecular noise. Here we present a theoretical framework to study the principles of noise management by the molecular networks in living cells. The theory makes use of the natural, hierarchical organization of those networks and makes their noise management more understandable in terms of network structure. Principles governing noise management by ultrasensitive systems, signaling cascades, gene networks and feedback circuitry are discovered using this approach. For a few frequently occurring network motifs we show how they manage noise. We derive simple and intuitive equations for noise in molecule copy numbers as a determinant of physiological heterogeneity. We show how noise levels and signal sensitivity can be set independently in molecular networks, but often changes in signal sensitivity affect noise propagation. Using theory and simulations, we show that negative feedback can both enhance and reduce noise. We identify a trade-off; noise reduction in one molecular intermediate by negative feedback is at the expense of increased noise in the levels of other molecules along the feedback loop. The reactants of the processes that are strongly (cooperatively) regulated, so as to allow for negative feedback with a high strength, will display enhanced noise.Author Summary: Within cells, fluctuations in molecule numbers are inevitable, since the synthesis and degradation of molecules are not synchronised. Such molecular noise can be transferred to other molecules through regulatory interactions. Noise in molecular networks, and especially in gene expression, has been studied extensively over the past years, both experimentally and through mathematical modelling. In this work, we present a theoretical framework that merges concepts derived from metabolic control analysis (which was originally developed to describe the control in metabolic pathways) with linear noise approximation (a concept from statistical physics). This framework is useful to analyse how noise propagates through molecular networks, how noise can be managed within the networks and how different network designs reduce or enhance noise. The present theory makes use of the natural, hierarchical organization of regulatory networks and makes their noise management more understandable in terms of network structure. Within this paper, we apply the framework to signaling and regulatory cascades, and analyse how feedback and time scale separation influence noise propagation in molecular networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank J Bruggeman & Nils Blüthgen & Hans V Westerhoff, 2009. "Noise Management by Molecular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000506
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000506&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attila Becskei & Luis Serrano, 2000. "Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6786), pages 590-593, June.
    2. Namiko Mitarai & Ian B Dodd & Michael T Crooks & Kim Sneppen, 2008. "The Generation of Promoter-Mediated Transcriptional Noise in Bacteria," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Gil Hornung & Naama Barkai, 2008. "Noise Propagation and Signaling Sensitivity in Biological Networks: A Role for Positive Feedback," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, January.
    4. John R. S. Newman & Sina Ghaemmaghami & Jan Ihmels & David K. Breslow & Matthew Noble & Joseph L. DeRisi & Jonathan S. Weissman, 2006. "Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 840-846, June.
    5. Arjun Raj & Charles S Peskin & Daniel Tranchina & Diana Y Vargas & Sanjay Tyagi, 2006. "Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Long Cai & Nir Friedman & X. Sunney Xie, 2006. "Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7082), pages 358-362, March.
    7. Johan Paulsson, 2004. "Summing up the noise in gene networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6973), pages 415-418, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhyudai Singh & Mohammad Soltani, 2013. "Quantifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variability in Stochastic Gene Expression Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Mohammad Soltani & Cesar A Vargas-Garcia & Duarte Antunes & Abhyudai Singh, 2016. "Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Yichen Li & Yumin Li & Hui Zhang & Yong Chen, 2011. "MicroRNA-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop and Optimized Bistable Switch in a Cancer Network Involving miR-17-92," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-9, October.
    4. Lee, Julian, 2023. "Poisson distributions in stochastic dynamics of gene expression: What events do they count?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    5. Károly Kovács & Laurence D Hurst & Balázs Papp, 2009. "Stochasticity in Protein Levels Drives Colinearity of Gene Order in Metabolic Operons of Escherichia coli," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    6. Warren Pilbrough & Trent P Munro & Peter Gray, 2009. "Intraclonal Protein Expression Heterogeneity in Recombinant CHO Cells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Niraj Kumar & Abhyudai Singh & Rahul V Kulkarni, 2015. "Transcriptional Bursting in Gene Expression: Analytical Results for General Stochastic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Benjamin B Kaufmann & Qiong Yang & Jerome T Mettetal & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2007. "Heritable Stochastic Switching Revealed by Single-Cell Genealogy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.
    9. Liming Wang & Jack Xin & Qing Nie, 2010. "A Critical Quantity for Noise Attenuation in Feedback Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Stuart Aitken & Marie-Cécile Robert & Ross D Alexander & Igor Goryanin & Edouard Bertrand & Jean D Beggs, 2010. "Processivity and Coupling in Messenger RNA Transcription," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Chen Jia & Ramon Grima, 2024. "Holimap: an accurate and efficient method for solving stochastic gene network dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Kyung H Kim & Herbert M Sauro, 2012. "Adjusting Phenotypes by Noise Control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Jérémie Bourdon & Damien Eveillard & Anne Siegel, 2011. "Integrating Quantitative Knowledge into a Qualitative Gene Regulatory Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    14. Najme Khorasani & Mehdi Sadeghi & Abbas Nowzari-Dalini, 2020. "A computational model of stem cell molecular mechanism to maintain tissue homeostasis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Tanya L Leise & Connie W Wang & Paula J Gitis & David K Welsh, 2012. "Persistent Cell-Autonomous Circadian Oscillations in Fibroblasts Revealed by Six-Week Single-Cell Imaging of PER2::LUC Bioluminescence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Elijah Roberts & Andrew Magis & Julio O Ortiz & Wolfgang Baumeister & Zaida Luthey-Schulten, 2011. "Noise Contributions in an Inducible Genetic Switch: A Whole-Cell Simulation Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Marc S Sherman & Barak A Cohen, 2014. "A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Luca Cardelli & Rosa D Hernansaiz-Ballesteros & Neil Dalchau & Attila Csikász-Nagy, 2017. "Efficient Switches in Biology and Computer Science," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Chen, Aimin & Tian, Tianhai & Chen, Yiren & Zhou, Tianshou, 2022. "Stochastic analysis of a complex gene-expression model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Jonathan Liu & Donald Hansen & Elizabeth Eck & Yang Joon Kim & Meghan Turner & Simon Alamos & Hernan Garcia, 2021. "Real-time single-cell characterization of the eukaryotic transcription cycle reveals correlations between RNA initiation, elongation, and cleavage," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.