IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional Maps of Protein Complexes from Quantitative Genetic Interaction Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sourav Bandyopadhyay
  • Ryan Kelley
  • Nevan J Krogan
  • Trey Ideker

Abstract

Recently, a number of advanced screening technologies have allowed for the comprehensive quantification of aggravating and alleviating genetic interactions among gene pairs. In parallel, TAP-MS studies (tandem affinity purification followed by mass spectroscopy) have been successful at identifying physical protein interactions that can indicate proteins participating in the same molecular complex. Here, we propose a method for the joint learning of protein complexes and their functional relationships by integration of quantitative genetic interactions and TAP-MS data. Using 3 independent benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that this method is >50% more accurate at identifying functionally related protein pairs than previous approaches. Application to genes involved in yeast chromosome organization identifies a functional map of 91 multimeric complexes, a number of which are novel or have been substantially expanded by addition of new subunits. Interestingly, we find that complexes that are enriched for aggravating genetic interactions (i.e., synthetic lethality) are more likely to contain essential genes, linking each of these interactions to an underlying mechanism. These results demonstrate the importance of both large-scale genetic and physical interaction data in mapping pathway architecture and function.Author Summary: Biologists are currently producing large amounts of data focused on physical and genetic protein interactions. Physical interactions dictate the architecture of the cell in terms of how direct associations between molecules constitute protein complexes, while genetic interactions define functional relationships through cause-and-effect relationships between genes. Both of these types of interactions can indicate shared protein functions; however, these two types of interactions are commonly non-overlapping, making their interpretation difficult. Along these lines, it has been noted that genetic interactions commonly occur between members of the same protein complex as well as between functionally related complexes. Here, we present an integrated framework that incorporates both types of interactions to generate large maps of protein complexes as well as highlight connections between related complexes. The ability to rapidly integrate these two types of data in an automated fashion can accelerate the discovery of new members of protein complexes as well as identify functionally related cellular components.

Suggested Citation

  • Sourav Bandyopadhyay & Ryan Kelley & Nevan J Krogan & Trey Ideker, 2008. "Functional Maps of Protein Complexes from Quantitative Genetic Interaction Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000065
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher T. Harbison & D. Benjamin Gordon & Tong Ihn Lee & Nicola J. Rinaldi & Kenzie D. Macisaac & Timothy W. Danford & Nancy M. Hannett & Jean-Bosco Tagne & David B. Reynolds & Jane Yoo & Ezra G., 2004. "Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7004), pages 99-104, September.
    2. Zu-Wen Sun & C. David Allis, 2002. "Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6893), pages 104-108, July.
    3. Jason Ptacek & Geeta Devgan & Gregory Michaud & Heng Zhu & Xiaowei Zhu & Joseph Fasolo & Hong Guo & Ghil Jona & Ashton Breitkreutz & Richelle Sopko & Rhonda R. McCartney & Martin C. Schmidt & Najma Ra, 2005. "Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7068), pages 679-684, December.
    4. Rachel B. Brem & John D. Storey & Jacqueline Whittle & Leonid Kruglyak, 2005. "Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7051), pages 701-703, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saket Navlakha & Anthony Gitter & Ziv Bar-Joseph, 2012. "A Network-based Approach for Predicting Missing Pathway Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Matvei Khoroshkin & Andrey Buyan & Martin Dodel & Albertas Navickas & Johnny Yu & Fathima Trejo & Anthony Doty & Rithvik Baratam & Shaopu Zhou & Sean B. Lee & Tanvi Joshi & Kristle Garcia & Benedict C, 2024. "Systematic identification of post-transcriptional regulatory modules," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Armita Nourmohammad & Michael Lässig, 2011. "Formation of Regulatory Modules by Local Sequence Duplication," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Shinsuke Ohnuki & Yoshikazu Ohya, 2018. "High-dimensional single-cell phenotyping reveals extensive haploinsufficiency," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Thomas C Whisenant & David T Ho & Ryan W Benz & Jeffrey S Rogers & Robyn M Kaake & Elizabeth A Gordon & Lan Huang & Pierre Baldi & Lee Bardwell, 2010. "Computational Prediction and Experimental Verification of New MAP Kinase Docking Sites and Substrates Including Gli Transcription Factors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Guo-Cheng Yuan & Jun S Liu, 2008. "Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Pengyi Yang & Xiaofeng Zheng & Vivek Jayaswal & Guang Hu & Jean Yee Hwa Yang & Raja Jothi, 2015. "Knowledge-Based Analysis for Detecting Key Signaling Events from Time-Series Phosphoproteomics Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Joshua S Weitz & Philip N Benfey & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Evolution, Interactions, and Biological Networks," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3, January.
    9. Zheyang Wu & Hongyu Zhao, 2009. "Statistical Power of Model Selection Strategies for Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Manikandan Narayanan & Adrian Vetta & Eric E Schadt & Jun Zhu, 2010. "Simultaneous Clustering of Multiple Gene Expression and Physical Interaction Datasets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Yue Yuan & Qiang Huo & Ziru Zhang & Qun Wang & Juanxia Wang & Shuaikang Chang & Peng Cai & Karen M. Song & David W. Galbraith & Weixiao Zhang & Long Huang & Rentao Song & Zeyang Ma, 2024. "Decoding the gene regulatory network of endosperm differentiation in maize," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Eilon Sharon & Shai Lubliner & Eran Segal, 2008. "A Feature-Based Approach to Modeling Protein–DNA Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Xiaoyu Tu & Sibo Ren & Wei Shen & Jianjian Li & Yuxiang Li & Chuanshun Li & Yangmeihui Li & Zhanxiang Zong & Weibo Xie & Donald Grierson & Zhangjun Fei & Jim Giovannoni & Pinghua Li & Silin Zhong, 2022. "Limited conservation in cross-species comparison of GLK transcription factor binding suggested wide-spread cistrome divergence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Xiaoke Ma & Long Gao & Georgios Karamanlidis & Peng Gao & Chi Fung Lee & Lorena Garcia-Menendez & Rong Tian & Kai Tan, 2015. "Revealing Pathway Dynamics in Heart Diseases by Analyzing Multiple Differential Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Shojaie Ali & Michailidis George, 2010. "Network Enrichment Analysis in Complex Experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Jacob D Feala & Jorge Cortes & Phillip M Duxbury & Andrew D McCulloch & Carlo Piermarocchi & Giovanni Paternostro, 2012. "Statistical Properties and Robustness of Biological Controller-Target Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Phaedra Agius & Aaron Arvey & William Chang & William Stafford Noble & Christina Leslie, 2010. "High Resolution Models of Transcription Factor-DNA Affinities Improve In Vitro and In Vivo Binding Predictions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Kenzie D MacIsaac & Ernest Fraenkel, 2006. "Practical Strategies for Discovering Regulatory DNA Sequence Motifs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(4), pages 1-10, April.
    19. Zing Tsung-Yeh Tsai & Shin-Han Shiu & Huai-Kuang Tsai, 2015. "Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Gross, Eitan, 2015. "Effect of environmental stress on regulation of gene expression in the yeast," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 224-235.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.