IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Models Using Experimentally Measured Flux Profiles

Author

Listed:
  • Markus J Herrgård
  • Stephen S Fong
  • Bernhard Ø Palsson

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic network models can be reconstructed for well-characterized organisms using genomic annotation and literature information. However, there are many instances in which model predictions of metabolic fluxes are not entirely consistent with experimental data, indicating that the reactions in the model do not match the active reactions in the in vivo system. We introduce a method for determining the active reactions in a genome-scale metabolic network based on a limited number of experimentally measured fluxes. This method, called optimal metabolic network identification (OMNI), allows efficient identification of the set of reactions that results in the best agreement between in silico predicted and experimentally measured flux distributions. We applied the method to intracellular flux data for evolved Escherichia coli mutant strains with lower than predicted growth rates in order to identify reactions that act as flux bottlenecks in these strains. The expression of the genes corresponding to these bottleneck reactions was often found to be downregulated in the evolved strains relative to the wild-type strain. We also demonstrate the ability of the OMNI method to diagnose problems in E. coli strains engineered for metabolite overproduction that have not reached their predicted production potential. The OMNI method applied to flux data for evolved strains can be used to provide insights into mechanisms that limit the ability of microbial strains to evolve towards their predicted optimal growth phenotypes. When applied to industrial production strains, the OMNI method can also be used to suggest metabolic engineering strategies to improve byproduct secretion. In addition to these applications, the method should prove to be useful in general for reconstructing metabolic networks of ill-characterized microbial organisms based on limited amounts of experimental data.Synopsis: One of the major uses of in silico models in biology is to identify discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data and use these discrepancies to drive discovery of novel biological mechanisms. However, models only allow for identification of the discrepancies; they do not necessarily provide any assistance in discovering what are the missing or incorrect functionalities in the model that cause these discrepancies. Herrgård et al. describe a new in silico method, optimal metabolic network identification, or OMNI, that performs this discovery process in an efficient and systematic manner for genome-scale metabolic networks. Given a preliminary metabolic network model and experimentally determined metabolic flux data, OMNI finds the changes that need to be made to the model so that its predictions match the experimental data as well as possible. Herrgård et al. apply the method to identify metabolic bottlenecks in experimentally evolved Escherichia coli strains and to diagnose problems in strains designed through metabolic engineering strategies to overproduce specific desirable byproducts. The OMNI method can also be adapted to number of other settings, including identification of novel biochemical pathways in ill-characterized organisms based on limited amounts of experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus J Herrgård & Stephen S Fong & Bernhard Ø Palsson, 2006. "Identification of Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Models Using Experimentally Measured Flux Profiles," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020072
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020072&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael U. Ibarra & Jeremy S. Edwards & Bernhard O. Palsson, 2002. "Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 186-189, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew N Benedict & Michael B Mundy & Christopher S Henry & Nicholas Chia & Nathan D Price, 2014. "Likelihood-Based Gene Annotations for Gap Filling and Quality Assessment in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avraham E Mayo & Yaakov Setty & Seagull Shavit & Alon Zaslaver & Uri Alon, 2006. "Plasticity of the cis-Regulatory Input Function of a Gene," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, March.
    2. Marcelo Rivas-Astroza & Raúl Conejeros, 2020. "Metabolic flux configuration determination using information entropy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2018. "Cyanobacteria and Microalgae : Thermoeconomic Considerations in Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Iván Domenzain & Benjamín Sánchez & Mihail Anton & Eduard J. Kerkhoven & Aarón Millán-Oropeza & Céline Henry & Verena Siewers & John P. Morrissey & Nikolaus Sonnenschein & Jens Nielsen, 2022. "Reconstruction of a catalogue of genome-scale metabolic models with enzymatic constraints using GECKO 2.0," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Matthew N Benedict & Michael B Mundy & Christopher S Henry & Nicholas Chia & Nathan D Price, 2014. "Likelihood-Based Gene Annotations for Gap Filling and Quality Assessment in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Claudio Altafini & Giuseppe Facchetti, 2015. "Metabolic Adaptation Processes That Converge to Optimal Biomass Flux Distributions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Andras Gyorgy, 2023. "Competition and evolutionary selection among core regulatory motifs in gene expression control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Lucia, Umberto, 2012. "Irreversibility in biophysical and biochemical engineering," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(23), pages 5997-6007.
    9. William R Harcombe & Nigel F Delaney & Nicholas Leiby & Niels Klitgord & Christopher J Marx, 2013. "The Ability of Flux Balance Analysis to Predict Evolution of Central Metabolism Scales with the Initial Distance to the Optimum," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.