IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/2001457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of stochasticity and division of labor in toxin production on two-strain bacterial competition in Escherichia coli

Author

Listed:
  • Benedikt von Bronk
  • Sophia Anna Schaffer
  • Alexandra Götz
  • Madeleine Opitz

Abstract

In phenotypically heterogeneous microbial populations, the decision to adopt one or another phenotype is often stochastically regulated. However, how this stochasticity affects interactions between competing microbes in mixed communities is difficult to assess. One example of such an interaction system is the competition of an Escherichia coli strain C, which performs division of labor between reproducers and self-sacrificing toxin producers, with a toxin-sensitive strain S. The decision between reproduction or toxin production within a single C cell is inherently stochastic. Here, combining experimental and theoretical approaches, we demonstrate that this stochasticity in the initial phase of colony formation is the crucial determinant for the competition outcome. In the initial phase (t

Suggested Citation

  • Benedikt von Bronk & Sophia Anna Schaffer & Alexandra Götz & Madeleine Opitz, 2017. "Effects of stochasticity and division of labor in toxin production on two-strain bacterial competition in Escherichia coli," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2001457
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2001457
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2001457&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2001457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.