IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1002036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinct Brain Systems Mediate the Effects of Nociceptive Input and Self-Regulation on Pain

Author

Listed:
  • Choong-Wan Woo
  • Mathieu Roy
  • Jason T Buhle
  • Tor D Wager

Abstract

: Two distinct parallel neural systems independently contribute to our overall experience of pain – separately modulated by noxious input and by cognitive self-regulation. Cognitive self-regulation can strongly modulate pain and emotion. However, it is unclear whether self-regulation primarily influences primary nociceptive and affective processes or evaluative ones. In this study, participants engaged in self-regulation to increase or decrease pain while experiencing multiple levels of painful heat during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) imaging. Both heat intensity and self-regulation strongly influenced reported pain, but they did so via two distinct brain pathways. The effects of stimulus intensity were mediated by the neurologic pain signature (NPS), an a priori distributed brain network shown to predict physical pain with over 90% sensitivity and specificity across four studies. Self-regulation did not influence NPS responses; instead, its effects were mediated through functional connections between the nucleus accumbens and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. This pathway was unresponsive to noxious input, and has been broadly implicated in valuation, emotional appraisal, and functional outcomes in pain and other types of affective processes. These findings provide evidence that pain reports are associated with two dissociable functional systems: nociceptive/affective aspects mediated by the NPS, and evaluative/functional aspects mediated by a fronto-striatal system.Author Summary: Does cognitive self-regulation influence pain experience by affecting the primary representations of painful (nociceptive) stimuli in the brain? Or does it regulate reported pain via a neural pathway that is distinct from the one that mediates nociceptive pain? The present study demonstrates that nociceptive and cognitive manipulations of pain influence two distinct, separable neural systems, which operate together to construct the pain experience. The neurologic pain signature (NPS) mediates the effects of noxious input, whereas a fronto-striatal pathway connecting nucleus accumbens and ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediates the effects of cognitive self-regulation of pain. These findings help move the field beyond the “one system” view of pain as a primarily nociceptive process, and provide a foundation for new approaches to multidimensional pain assessment and treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Choong-Wan Woo & Mathieu Roy & Jason T Buhle & Tor D Wager, 2015. "Distinct Brain Systems Mediate the Effects of Nociceptive Input and Self-Regulation on Pain," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002036
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002036
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002036&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph J. Paton & Marina A. Belova & Sara E. Morrison & C. Daniel Salzman, 2006. "The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7078), pages 865-870, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. E. Hoeppli & H. Nahman-Averbuch & W. A. Hinkle & E. Leon & J. Peugh & M. Lopez-Sola & C. D. King & K. R. Goldschneider & R. C. Coghill, 2022. "Dissociation between individual differences in self-reported pain intensity and underlying fMRI brain activation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jaron T Colas & Wolfgang M Pauli & Tobias Larsen & J Michael Tyszka & John P O’Doherty, 2017. "Distinct prediction errors in mesostriatal circuits of the human brain mediate learning about the values of both states and actions: evidence from high-resolution fMRI," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Xiqin Liu & Guojuan Jiao & Feng Zhou & Keith M. Kendrick & Dezhong Yao & Qiyong Gong & Shitong Xiang & Tianye Jia & Xiao-Yong Zhang & Jie Zhang & Jianfeng Feng & Benjamin Becker, 2024. "A neural signature for the subjective experience of threat anticipation under uncertainty," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Etienne Vachon-Presseau & Sara E Berger & Taha B Abdullah & James W Griffith & Thomas J Schnitzer & A Vania Apkarian, 2019. "Identification of traits and functional connectivity-based neurotraits of chronic pain," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Feng Zhou & Weihua Zhao & Ziyu Qi & Yayuan Geng & Shuxia Yao & Keith M. Kendrick & Tor D. Wager & Benjamin Becker, 2021. "A distributed fMRI-based signature for the subjective experience of fear," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiroyuki Kawai & Youcef Bouchekioua & Naoya Nishitani & Kazuhei Niitani & Shoma Izumi & Hinako Morishita & Chihiro Andoh & Yuma Nagai & Masashi Koda & Masako Hagiwara & Koji Toda & Hisashi Shirakawa &, 2022. "Median raphe serotonergic neurons projecting to the interpeduncular nucleus control preference and aversion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ren-Wen Han & Zi-Yi Zhang & Chen Jiao & Ze-Yu Hu & Bing-Xing Pan, 2024. "Synergism between two BLA-to-BNST pathways for appropriate expression of anxiety-like behaviors in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Kim, Jeong-Bon & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Seeing is believing? Executives' facial trustworthiness, auditor tenure, and audit fees," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
    4. Rafal Rygula & Helena Pluta & Piotr Popik, 2012. "Laughing Rats Are Optimistic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.