IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v29y1990i3-4p291-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption of Tubewell Technology in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • M. Jamil Chaudhry

    (University of Balochistan, Quetta.)

Abstract

The use and adoption of indivisible technology are not restricted by ownership or class structure. We have found, however, that in 1972,-and still in 1980, though tubewells were owned by a minor fraction of total farm households (and predominantly by the large and medium farmers), they were used by a substantial proportion of farm households. Predictably, the user-owner ratio was the highest in the case of the small farmers in all provinces. The relative importance of the small and medium farmers as owners of this technology increased over the period, particularly in the Punjab where tubewells are concentrated. The development of a hire market in tubewell services has given birth to a new entrepreneurial class in the rural areas. Inequalities in rural income are dwindling and benefits emanating from new technology are shared. These conclusions are of vital importance because they negate the existing views and show that CO the indivisibility of technology has not been a barrier to its adoption, and that (ii) the fact that the share of the small and medium farmers in the ownership of tubewells has increased gives support to the thesis that if a technology is profitable, farmers will adopt it where possible. Thus, the view that small farmers are conservative and resist change can no longer be sustained. Further, it shows that the small and medium farm sector, in particular, holds the potential for investment in technology.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Jamil Chaudhry, 1990. "The Adoption of Tubewell Technology in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 29(3 and 4), pages 291-303.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:29:y:1990:i:3-4:p:291-303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1990/Volume3-4/291-303.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiromitsu Kaneda & Mohammed Ghaffar, 1970. "Output Effects of Tubewells on the Agriculture of the Punjab Some Empirical Results," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 68-87.
    2. Ghulam Mohammad, 1964. "Some Strategic Problems in Agricultural Development in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 223-260.
    3. Walter P. Falcon, 1970. "The Green Revolution: Generations of Problems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(5), pages 698-710.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wichelns, Dennis, 1999. "An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-491, September.
    2. Asghar, Sobia & Tsusaka, Takuji W. & Jourdain, Damien & Saqib, Shahab E. & Sasaki, Nophea, 2022. "Assessing the efficiency of smallholder sugarcane production: The case of Faisalabad, Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Hadia Majid, 2022. "Drought, Farm Output and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 32-56, April.
    4. Ruth Meinzen-Dick, 1993. "Performance of Groundwater Markets in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 833-845.
    5. Watto, Muhammad, 2013. "Measuring Groundwater Irrigation Efficiency in Pakistan: A DEA Approach Using the Sub-vector and Slack-based Models," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152204, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Sullins, Martha, 1994. "Water markets in Pakistan: participation and productivity," EPTD discussion papers 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Watto, Muhammad Arif & Mugera, Amin William, 2013. "Measuring Groundwater Irrigation Efficiency in Pakistan: A DEA Approach Using the Sub-vector and Slack-based Models," Working Papers 144943, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmood Hasan Khan, 1981. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Research in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 191-213.
    2. Abel, Martin E. & Welsch, Delane E., 1973. "Technology And The Agricultural Output Mix," Staff Papers 13236, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Peter Warr, 2022. "Research and productivity in Indonesian agriculture," Departmental Working Papers 2022-02, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    4. Peter Warr, 2023. "Productivity in Indonesian agriculture: Impacts of domestic and international research," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 835-856, September.
    5. Mudahar, Mohinder S., 1974. "Dynamic Analysis of Direct and Indirect Implications of Technological Change in Agriculture: The Case of Punjab, India," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 323808, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Coxhead, Ian A. & Warr, Peter G., 1991. "Poverty and Welfare Effects of Technical Change: A General Equilibrium Analysis for Philippine Agriculture," 1991 Conference (35th), February 11-14, 1991, Armidale, Australia 145558, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. YUJIRO HAyAMI & VERNON W RUTTAN, 1984. "The Green Revolution: Inducement and Distribution," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 37-63.
    8. Tim Ensor, 1990. "The use of economics in the evaluation of nutritional problems and policy," Working Papers 077chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    9. Masters, William A. & Bedingar, Touba & Oehmke, James F., 1998. "The impact of agricultural research in Africa: aggregate and case study evidence," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 81-86, September.
    10. Roumasset, James, 2024. "Lexicographic Ordering and Loss Aversion among Low-Income Farmers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 483-492.
    11. Abel, Martin E. & Welsch, Delane E. & Jolly, Robert W., 1973. "Technology And Agricultural Diversification," Staff Papers 13908, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Mariapia Mendola, 2003. "Agricultural Technology and Povertry Reduction: A Micro-Level Analysis of Causal Effects," Development Working Papers 179, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    13. Mariapia MENDOLA, 2005. "Agricultural technology and poverty reduction: a micro-level analysis of causal effects," Departmental Working Papers 2005-14, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    14. Laxmi Prasad Pant, 2019. "Responsible innovation through conscious contestation at the interface of agricultural science, policy, and civil society," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 183-197, June.
    15. Herdt, Robert W., 1992. "Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor in Developing Countries," 1991 Conference, August 22-29, 1991, Tokyo, Japan 183349, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Kikuchi, Masao & Hayami, Yujiro, 1982. "New Rice Technology and Income Distribution--A Perspective from Villages in Java--," Economic Review, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 33(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Bonjean, Isabelle & Verardi, Vincenzo, 2017. "Innovation Adoption and Liquidity Constraints in the Presence of Grassroots Extension Agents: Evidence from the Peruvian Highla," CEPR Discussion Papers 12263, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Haggblade, Steven & Hazell, Peter B., 1988. "Prospects for equitable growth in rural sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8, The World Bank.
    19. Mario M. Carrillo-Huerta, 1978. "Determinants of the Adoption of Agricultural Innovations," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 22(2), pages 50-55, October.
    20. Sidhu, Surjit S., 1973. "Economics Of Technical Change In Wheat Production In Punjab (India)," Staff Papers 13290, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:29:y:1990:i:3-4:p:291-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.