IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v6y2020i1d10.1057_s41599-020-0469-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Lorelli Nowell

    (University of Calgary
    University of Calgary)

  • Glory Ovie

    (University of Calgary
    University of Calgary)

  • Natasha Kenny

    (University of Calgary)

  • Michele Jacobsen

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Postdoctoral scholars pursue diverse career paths requiring broad skill sets; however, little is known about postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about their professional learning, and development needs. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to identify current professional learning and development opportunities used by postdoctoral scholars to obtain the required broad skills sets of value for a changing career landscape. A concurrent mixed-methods design was utilized including a cross sectional survey and qualitative interviews. Analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis; quantitative and qualitative findings were then triangulated for convergent themes. Key findings indicate that although postdoctoral scholars engage in a variety of professional learning, the perceived usefulness of these sessions varies widely, and the types of professional learning and development that they engage in, may not best support the realities of their future careers. Given the significant resources often required to support professional learning and development initiatives, a deeper understanding and alignment of postdoctoral scholars needs with provided opportunities may help to ensure scarce resources are invested in the most useful and effective strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorelli Nowell & Glory Ovie & Natasha Kenny & Michele Jacobsen, 2020. "Postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0469-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0469-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-020-0469-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-020-0469-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annalena Welp & Anya Johnson & Helena Nguyen & Lin Perry, 2018. "The importance of reflecting on practice: How personal professional development activities affect perceived teamwork and performance," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3988-3999, November.
    2. Charles T. Clotfelter, 2010. "Introduction to "American Universities in a Global Market"," NBER Chapters, in: American Universities in a Global Market, pages 1-29, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Charles T. Clotfelter, 2010. "American Universities in a Global Market," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number clot08-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez, Cristina & Liu, Yamin & Shu, Xiaoling, 2012. "The Faculty Promotion And Merit System In China And The United States: The Cases Of Wuhan University And The University Of California, Davis," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt44v8533m, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    2. Miguel Urquiola, 2023. "Higher Education in the United States: Laissez‐Faire, Differentiation, and Research," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 196-213, July.
    3. W. Bentley MacLeod & Miguel Urquiola, 2021. "Why Does the United States Have the Best Research Universities? Incentives, Resources, and Virtuous Circles," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 185-206, Winter.
    4. Astorne-Figari, Carmen & Speer, Jamin D., 2018. "Drop out, switch majors, or persist? The contrasting gender gaps," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 82-85.
    5. Stefano Breschi & Francesco Lissoni & Ernest Miguelez, 2018. "Return Migrants' Self-Selection: Evidence for Indian Inventors," NBER Chapters, in: The Roles of Immigrants and Foreign Students in US Science, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, pages 17-48, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Daniëlle Bertrand-Cloodt & Frank Cörvers & Hans Heijke, 2017. "Ability, Academic Climate, and Going Abroad for Work or Pursuing a PhD," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 63(1), pages 119-140.
    7. MacLeod, W. Bentley & Urquiola, Miguel, 2020. "Why Does the U.S. Have the Best Research Universities? Incentives, Resources, and Virtuous Circles," IZA Discussion Papers 13203, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0469-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.