IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p3988-3999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of reflecting on practice: How personal professional development activities affect perceived teamwork and performance

Author

Listed:
  • Annalena Welp
  • Anya Johnson
  • Helena Nguyen
  • Lin Perry

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the relationships between participation in personal professional development activities (e.g., coaching, mentoring), teamwork and performance; to investigate the mediating and moderating effects of reflective thinking and perceived usefulness of development activities. Background Professional development is associated with better performance and attitudes towards one's work. This study adds to this research by focusing on understanding this effect and the conditions under which this occurs. Design Cross‐sectional survey study. Methods Participants were 244 nurses working in a large, metropolitan acute public hospital. They completed a questionnaire consisting of validated measures and provided information on frequency of participation and perceived usefulness of personal professional development activities. We analysed data using regression‐based moderated mediation analyses. Results The relationship between frequency of participation in personal professional development activities and both perceived teamwork and performance was mediated by reflective thinking. Perceived usefulness of development activities moderated the relationship between frequency of participation in personal professional development activities and reflective thinking. Conclusion Our results highlight the importance of professional development activities that go beyond knowledge‐ or skill‐based training. Activities that cater to nurses’ personal professional development needs are also associated with more positively perceived teamwork and performance. Results provide insights into the mediating mechanisms: Participation in personal professional development activities encouraged reflective thinking, which was associated with better perceived teamwork and performance. This association between personal professional development activities and reflective thinking was even stronger where nurses perceived the activities as useful. Relevance to clinical practice Personal professional development activities enhance reflection in and on practice as these activities were linked with higher perceived quality of care and teamworking. It is important to ensure that the positive effects of personal professional development activities should target nurses’ professional development needs and need to be perceived as useful by those who undertake them.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalena Welp & Anya Johnson & Helena Nguyen & Lin Perry, 2018. "The importance of reflecting on practice: How personal professional development activities affect perceived teamwork and performance," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3988-3999, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3988-3999
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorelli Nowell & Glory Ovie & Natasha Kenny & Michele Jacobsen, 2020. "Postdoctoral scholars’ perspectives about professional learning and development: a concurrent mixed-methods study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:3988-3999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.