IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04028-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient acceptance of medical service robots in the medical intelligence era: an empirical study based on an extended AI device use acceptance model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjia Li

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

  • Huangyi Ding

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

  • Jingjing Gui

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

  • Qinghe Tang

    (Tongji University)

Abstract

In the era of medical intelligence, there are still few studies focusing on medical service robots from a user experience perspective. Guided by the model of artificial intelligence (AI) device use acceptance (AIDUA), this article develops a theoretical model to explain patients’ intention to use medical service robots at hospitals. The proposed model specifically distinguished the dimensions of anthropomorphic attributes of service robots and further introduces two variables, perceived empathy and interaction experience, as a way to construct a three-stage psychological mechanism for patient acceptance of robots. 400 questionnaires from Chinese patients were collected offline and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that the four attributes of anthropomorphism play a differential influence in performance expectations and effort expectations, but all positively contribute to empathy, which in turn positively affects interaction quality. Interaction quality, performance expectations, and effort expectations all influence patients’ emotions, thus having an impact on patients’ intentions to accept service robots. The findings from this study will assist the healthcare sector in upgrading medical service robots, which will improve patient acceptance of these robots.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjia Li & Huangyi Ding & Jingjing Gui & Qinghe Tang, 2024. "Patient acceptance of medical service robots in the medical intelligence era: an empirical study based on an extended AI device use acceptance model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04028-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04028-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04028-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04028-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aorigele Bao & Yi Zeng & Enmeng Lu, 2023. "Mitigating emotional risks in human-social robot interactions through virtual interactive environment indication," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. Yuan, Chunlin & Zhang, Chenlei & Wang, Shuman, 2022. "Social anxiety as a moderator in consumer willingness to accept AI assistants based on utilitarian and hedonic values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Jung-Chieh Lee & Yuyin Tang & SiQi Jiang, 2023. "Understanding continuance intention of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mobile banking applications: an extension of AI characteristics to an expectation confirmation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Ahmed Eldakak & Abdulla Alremeithi & Emad Dahiyat & Moatasem El-Gheriani & Hassan Mohamed & Mohammad Ibrahim Abdulrahim Abdulla, 2024. "Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Pollmann, Kathrin & Loh, Wulf & Fronemann, Nora & Ziegler, Daniel, 2023. "Entertainment vs. manipulation: Personalized human-robot interaction between user experience and ethical design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    8. Noor Irliana Mohd Rahim & Noorminshah A. Iahad & Ahmad Fadhil Yusof & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi, 2022. "AI-Based Chatbots Adoption Model for Higher-Education Institutions: A Hybrid PLS-SEM-Neural Network Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Nicole Koenig-Lewis & Morgan Marquet & Adrian Palmer & Anita Lifen Zhao, 2015. "Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 537-554, July.
    10. Seo Young Kim & Bernd H. Schmitt & Nadia M. Thalmann, 2019. "Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Roland T. Rust & Ming-Hui Huang, 2014. "The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 206-221, March.
    12. Tobias Mettler & Michaela Sprenger & Robert Winter, 2017. "Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 451-468, September.
    13. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    14. Uijin Jung & Jinseo Lee & Ji-Young Choi & Hyun Yim & Myoung-Jin Lee, 2023. "Future Service Robot Scenarios in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang & Nancy V. Wünderlich & Christian Brock, 2021. "Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 632-658, July.
    16. Ahmad Alaiad & Lina Zhou & Gunes Koru, 2014. "An Exploratory Study of Home Healthcare Robots Adoption Applying the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 9(4), pages 44-59, October.
    17. Simon, Françoise, 2013. "The influence of empathy in complaint handling: Evidence of gratitudinal and transactional routes to loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 599-608.
    18. Vanja Vitezić & Marko Perić, 2021. "Artificial intelligence acceptance in services: connecting with Generation Z," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(13-14), pages 926-946, October.
    19. Gursoy, Dogan & Chi, Oscar Hengxuan & Lu, Lu & Nunkoo, Robin, 2019. "Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 157-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 26-42, June.
    2. Mengjun Li & Ayoung Suh, 2022. "Anthropomorphism in AI-enabled technology: A literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2245-2275, December.
    3. Yao, Qi & Hu, Chao & Zhou, Wenkai, 2024. "The impact of customer privacy concerns on service robot adoption intentions: A credence/experience service typology perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Janotta, Frederica & Hogreve, Jens, 2024. "Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 26-42, June.
    7. Kayeser Fatima, Johra & Khan, Md Irfanuzzaman & Bahmannia, Somayeh & Chatrath, Sarvjeet Kaur & Dale, Naomi F. & Johns, Raechel, 2024. "Rapport with a chatbot? The underlying role of anthropomorphism in socio-cognitive perceptions of rapport and e-word of mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Meennapa Rukhiran & Napasorn Phaokla & Paniti Netinant, 2022. "Adoption of Environmental Information Chatbot Services Based on the Internet of Educational Things in Smart Schools: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Song, Christina Soyoung & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2022. "The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 489-503.
    10. Ertugrul Uysal & Sascha Alavi & Valéry Bezençon, 2022. "Trojan horse or useful helper? A relationship perspective on artificial intelligence assistants with humanlike features," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1153-1175, November.
    11. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    12. Pelau Corina & Barbul Maria & Bojescu Irina, 2022. "A conceptual comparative approach on personal AI assistants and external service robots," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1466-1474, August.
    13. Dabiran, Ehsan & Farivar, Samira & Wang, Fang & Grant, Gerald, 2024. "Virtually human: anthropomorphism in virtual influencer marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Nathanael Johnson & Torsten Reimer, 2023. "The Adoption and Use of Smart Assistants in Residential Homes: The Matching Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Pelau Corina & Barbul Maria, 2021. "Consumers’ perception on the use of cognitive computing," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 639-649, December.
    16. Cheng-Feng Cheng & Chien-Che Huang & Ming-Chang Lin & Ta-Cheng Chen, 2023. "Exploring Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing on Artificial Intelligence Adopting Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    17. Jana Holthöwer & Jenny Doorn, 2023. "Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 767-784, July.
    18. Ding, Bin & Li, Yameng & Miah, Shah & Liu, Wei, 2024. "Customer acceptance of frontline social robots—Human-robot interaction as boundary condition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    20. Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor & Melanie Tan & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 0. "Tourists’ use of Airbnb app for visiting a historical city," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04028-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.