IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03921-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: the case of the UK Digital Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Efpraxia D. Zamani

    (Durham University Business School)

  • Anastasia Rousaki

    (Durham University Business School
    University of Sheffield)

Abstract

In this paper, we critically examine the 2022 UK Digital Strategy and argue that the UK government adopts with this policy document a customer-centric vision of governance, which undermines the traditional role of the government as a provider of public services with principles of justice and impartiality. This shift, exacerbated by digital poverty, appears incongruent with the social contract between citizens and the state. We employ a critical discourse analysis to identify contradictory outcomes resulting from these neoliberal policies and showcase that the UK Digital Strategy, while seemingly committed to aspects of equality and inclusivity, appear to prioritise almost entirely market rather than citizens’ interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Efpraxia D. Zamani & Anastasia Rousaki, 2024. "Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: the case of the UK Digital Strategy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03921-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03921-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03921-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03921-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lew Perren & Peter L. Jennings, 2005. "Government Discourses on Entrepreneurship: Issues of Legitimization, Subjugation, and Power," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(2), pages 173-184, March.
    2. José Manuel Robles & Cristobal Torres-Albero & Guillermo Villarino, 2022. "Inequalities in digital welfare take-up: lessons from e-government in Spain," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1096-1111, September.
    3. Velicu, Anca & Barbovschi, Monica & Rotaru, Ileana, 2022. "Socially isolated and digitally excluded. A qualitative exploratory study of the lives of Roma teenage mothers during the COVID-19 lockdown," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Priharsari, Diah & Abedin, Babak & Burdon, Steve & Clegg, Stewart & Clay, John, 2023. "National digital strategy development: Guidelines and lesson learnt from Asia Pacific countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Avgerou, Chrisanthi & Bonina, Carla, 2020. "Ideologies implicated in IT innovation in government: a critical discourse analysis of Mexico’s international trade administration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100940, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    7. Ziebland, Sue & Hyde, Emma & Powell, John, 2021. "Power, paradox and pessimism: On the unintended consequences of digital health technologies in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Nisreen N. Al-Khawaldeh & Luqman M. Rababah & Ali F. Khawaldeh & Alaeddin A. Banikalef, 2023. "The art of rhetoric: persuasive strategies in Biden’s inauguration speech: a critical discourse analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Charles Gore & Kate Meagher, 2015. "Leaving No One Behind?: Informal Economies, Economic Inclusion and Islamic Extremism in Nigeria," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 835-855, August.
    10. Brown, A. & Fishenden, Jerry & Thompson, M. & Venters, Will, 2017. "Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 73864, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Jeremy Aroles & Edward Granter & François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2020. "'Becoming mainstream': the professionalization and corporatization of digital nomadism," Post-Print hal-03778348, HAL.
    12. Aysha Fleming & Claire Mason & Gillian Paxton, 2018. "Discourses of technology, ageing and participation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    2. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    3. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4907 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    7. Pascale Amans & Agnes Mazars & Fabienne Villesèque-Dubus, 2013. "Techniques de gestion et organisations du spectacle vivant : quels dispositifs de soutien et quelles interactions pour l'innovation artistique ?," Post-Print hal-01002362, HAL.
    8. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    9. Philip J. Dobson, 2001. "The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 199-210, June.
    10. Klaus Brockhoff, 2006. "Technologischer Wandel und Corporate Governance," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(54), pages 7-31, January.
    11. Sara Cannizzaro & Rob Procter & Sinong Ma & Carsten Maple, 2020. "Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, May.
    12. Borozdina, Ekaterina, 2024. "Instant messengers and health professionals’ agency in Russian clinical settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    13. Yekinni Oyedeji Taofeeq & Owolabi Ayotunde Olayinka & Obaniyi Kayode Samuel, 2023. "Extension Practitioners Perception and Constraints on ICT Use in Southwestern Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    14. V. L. Tambovtsev, 2019. "Institutions-technologies interaction and economic growth," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 55-70, May.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/15200 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments. Une analyse généalogique des approches théoriques fondées sur les instruments de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(3), pages 5-37., September.
    17. Yang Liu & Moses Olabhele Esangbedo & Sijun Bai, 2019. "Adaptability of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Based on Organizational Identity: Some Factors of Partnership for the Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Andreas D. Landmark & Johan E. Ravn & Hans Y. Torvatn & Lisbeth Øyum, 2024. "Digital Transformations Through the Lens of the Collaborative, Co-Generative and Domesticative," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 537-548, October.
    19. Andrew Hargadon & Angelo Fanelli, 2002. "Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 290-302, June.
    20. XiaoHu Wang & XiaNan Wei & Montgomery Wart & Alma McCarthy & Cheol Liu & Soonhee Kim & David H. Ready, 2023. "The role of E-leadership in ICT utilization: a project management perspective," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 99-113, June.
    21. Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    22. Michiel Bal & Jos Benders & Lander Vermeerbergen, 2022. "‘Bringing the Covert into the Open’: A Case Study on Technology Appropriation and Continuous Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03921-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.