IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03004-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changing rules, recommendations, and risks: COVID-19 vaccination decisions and emotions during pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Lara McKenzie

    (The University of Western Australia
    Macquarie University)

  • Samantha J. Carlson

    (The University of Western Australia
    Telethon Kids Institute)

  • Christopher C. Blyth

    (Telethon Kids Institute
    The University of Western Australia
    Perth Children’s Hospital
    PathWest Laboratory Medicine)

  • Katie Attwell

    (The University of Western Australia)

Abstract

As COVID-19 vaccinations rolled out globally from late 2020, rules and recommendations regarding vaccine use in pregnancy shifted rapidly. Pre-registration COVID-19 vaccine trials excluded those who were pregnant. Initial Australian medical advice did not routinely recommend COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, due to limited safety data and little perceived risk of local transmission. Advice from local medical authorities changed throughout 2021, however, with recommendations and priority access during pregnancy. In Western Australia (WA), recommendations became requirements as the State government mandated vaccines for some workers, with brief availability of pregnancy exemptions. Through an examination of 10 in-depth interviews with WA pregnant women, we explore their decision-making and complex emotions regarding COVID-19 vaccinations, and how they balanced mandates, recommendations, and shifting considerations and perceptions of risk. Changing recommendations and rules—and media and popular interpretation and communications of these—led to confusion, including for medical professionals. Expectant parents had to negotiate the risks of COVID-19 disease, potential benefits and risks of vaccination, professional and personal costs of vaccine refusal, and interpret mixed medical advice. Our findings can inform the development and communication of public health policies and medical advice, and contribute to our understanding of bodily autonomy, risk, and decision-making beyond the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara McKenzie & Samantha J. Carlson & Christopher C. Blyth & Katie Attwell, 2024. "Changing rules, recommendations, and risks: COVID-19 vaccination decisions and emotions during pregnancy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03004-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03004-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03004-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03004-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Çelik, Kezban & Turan, Sevgi & Üner, Sarp, 2021. "I'm a mother, therefore I question”: Parents' legitimation sources of and hesitancy towards early childhood vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Aysegul Celikel & Ayfer Ustunsoz & Gulten Guvenc, 2014. "Determination of vaccination status of pregnant women during pregnancy and the affecting factors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2142-2150, August.
    3. Wiley, Kerrie E. & Leask, Julie & Attwell, Katie & Helps, Catherine & Degeling, Chris & Ward, Paul & Carter, Stacy M., 2020. "Parenting and the vaccine refusal process: A new explanation of the relationship between lifestyle and vaccination trajectories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Reich, Jennifer A., 2016. "Of natural bodies and antibodies: Parents' vaccine refusal and the dichotomies of natural and artificial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 103-110.
    5. Reich, Jennifer A., 2020. "“We are fierce, independent thinkers and intelligent”: Social capital and stigma management among mothers who refuse vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    6. Howell, Jennifer L. & Gasser, Melissa L. & Kaysen, Debra & Lindgren, Kristen P., 2022. "Understanding parental vaccine refusal: Implicit and explicit associations about vaccines as potential building blocks of vaccine beliefs and behavior," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ten Kate, Josje & de Koster, Willem & van der Waal, Jeroen, 2022. "Becoming skeptical towards vaccines: How health views shape the trajectories following health-related events," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Court, Jay & Carter, Stacy M. & Attwell, Katie & Leask, Julie & Wiley, Kerrie, 2021. "Labels matter: Use and non-use of ‘anti-vax’ framing in Australian media discourse 2008–2018," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Steven Stillman & Mirco Tonin, 2022. "Communities and testing for COVID-19," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(4), pages 617-625, June.
    4. Zhang, Zhiwei & Liu, Gao & Chen, Bin & Huang, Kun, 2022. "Social asset or social liability? How partisanship moderates the relationship between social capital and Covid-19 vaccination rates across United States counties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    5. Sundstrom, Beth & Smith, Ellie & Delay, Cara & Luque, John S. & Davila, Caroline & Feder, Bailey & Paddock, Vincenza & Poudrier, Jessie & Pierce, Jennifer Young & Brandt, Heather M., 2019. "A reproductive justice approach to understanding women's experiences with HPV and cervical cancer prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 289-297.
    6. Jordan Luttrell-Freeman & Timothy J. Bungum & Jennifer R. Pharr, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Rationale for Vaccine Hesitancy among American Parents," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(8), pages 1-77, August.
    7. Josselin Thuilliez & Nouhoum Touré, 2024. "Opinions and vaccination during an epidemic," Post-Print hal-04490900, HAL.
    8. Paolo Buonanno & Sergio Galletta & Marcello Puca, 2023. "The role of civic capital on vaccination," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 993-999, May.
    9. Athias, Laure & Macina, Moudo, 2022. "Demand for vaccination in Sub-Saharan Africa: The vertical legacy of the slave trade," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    10. Katie Attwell & Samantha B. Meyer & Paul R. Ward, 2018. "The Social Basis of Vaccine Questioning and Refusal: A Qualitative Study Employing Bourdieu’s Concepts of ‘Capitals’ and ‘Habitus’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Hernandez, Elaine M. & Calarco, Jessica McCrory, 2021. "Health decisions amidst controversy: Prenatal alcohol consumption and the unequal experience of influence and control in networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    12. Josselin Thuilliez & Nouhoum Touré, 2024. "Opinions and vaccination during an epidemic," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04490900, HAL.
    13. Argyris, Young Anna & Kim, Yongsuk & Roscizewski, Alexa & Song, Won, 2021. "The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy between maternal engagement with anti- and pro-vaccine social media posts and adolescent HPV-vaccine uptake rates in the US: The perspective of loss aversion in," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Cao, Yu & Li, Heng, 2023. "Everything has a limit: How intellectual humility lowers the preference for naturalness as reflected in drug choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    15. Rosenfeld, Daniel L. & Tomiyama, A. Janet, 2022. "Jab my arm, not my morality: Perceived moral reproach as a barrier to COVID-19 vaccine uptake," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    16. Eliz Kilich & Sara Dada & Mark R Francis & John Tazare & R Matthew Chico & Pauline Paterson & Heidi J Larson, 2020. "Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03004-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.