IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v26y2024i2d10.1057_s41278-023-00258-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connectivity and competitiveness of the major Mediterranean container ports using ‘Benefit-of-the-Doubt’ and ‘Common Sets of Weights’ methods in Data Envelopment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Julián Martinez-Moya

    (University of Valencia)

  • Amparo Mestre-Alcover

    (Market Intelligence, Fundación Valenciaport)

  • Ramon Sala-Garrido

    (University of Valencia)

Abstract

Port connectivity has become a key factor for the competitiveness of countries, ports and importing and exporting companies. In this regard, industries integrated into global value chains are dependent of shipping services and, consequently, the level of port connectivity determines their access to international markets in a reliable and flexible way. Given the growing importance of this issue, this paper aims to study foreland port connectivity by constructing a composite port connectivity indicator applied to the major Mediterranean container ports. In the construction of composite indicators, the weight assigned to each variable is a critical aspect as it affects the objectivity of the score provided. In methodological terms, it can be extremely complex to find the optimal set of weights. For this reason, the present research uses the novel approach of Benefit-of-the-Doubt-type Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and the Common Set of Weights method in DEA, to generate an accurate weighting scheme. The paper is the first to study the connectivity of major Mediterranean container ports: An area characterised by fierce competition between a large number of hub, gateway and mixed ports, where connectivity is a key factor of their competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Julián Martinez-Moya & Amparo Mestre-Alcover & Ramon Sala-Garrido, 2024. "Connectivity and competitiveness of the major Mediterranean container ports using ‘Benefit-of-the-Doubt’ and ‘Common Sets of Weights’ methods in Data Envelopment Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 261-282, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1057_s41278-023-00258-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-023-00258-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-023-00258-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-023-00258-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni, 2019. "The relationship between transhipment incidence and throughput volatility in North European and Mediterranean container ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 371-381.
    2. César Ducruet & Sung-Woo Lee & Adolf K.Y. Ng, 2010. "Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 17-36, January.
    3. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Feo-Valero, María, 2020. "Measuring foreland container port connectivity disaggregated by destination markets: An index for Short Sea Shipping services in Spanish ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Jan Hoffmann & Naima Saeed & Sigbjørn Sødal, 2020. "Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 473-499, September.
    6. Gordon Wilmsmeier & Jan Hoffmann, 2008. "Liner Shipping Connectivity and Port Infrastructure as Determinants of Freight Rates in the Caribbean," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 130-151, March.
    7. Wei Yim Yap & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "Dynamics of liner shipping service scheduling and their impact on container port competition," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 471-485, April.
    8. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks : a critical review," Post-Print hal-03246890, HAL.
    9. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    10. Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin & John Mangan & Elizabeth Jackson & Aurora Ruiz-Rua, 2016. "Understanding connectivity to international markets: a systematic review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 713-736, November.
    11. Mohamed-Chérif, Fatima & Ducruet, César, 2016. "Regional integration and maritime connectivity across the Maghreb seaport system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 280-293.
    12. Tovar, Beatriz & Hernández, Rubén & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor, 2015. "Container port competitiveness and connectivity: The Canary Islands main ports case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 40-51.
    13. T C Lirn & H A Thanopoulou & M J Beynon & A K C Beresford, 2004. "An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 70-91, March.
    14. Fatima Z. Mohamed-Chérif & César Ducruet, 2016. "Regional integration and maritime connectivity across the Maghreb seaport system," Post-Print halshs-01145664, HAL.
    15. Vikas Kumar Mishra & Bapi Dutta & Mark Goh & José Rui Figueira & Salvatore Greco, 2021. "A robust ranking of maritime connectivity: revisiting UNCTAD’s liner shipping connectivity index (LSCI)," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 424-443, September.
    16. Chuanxu Wang & Xiaohan Dou & Hercules Haralambides, 2022. "Port centrality and the Composite Connectivity Index: Introducing a new concept in assessing the attractiveness of hub ports," Post-Print hal-04046246, HAL.
    17. Fatima Mohammed-Chérif & César Ducruet, 2016. "Regional integration and maritime connectivity across the Maghreb seaport system," Post-Print hal-03246938, HAL.
    18. Chuanxu Wang & Xiaohan Dou & Hercules Haralambides, 2022. "Port centrality and the Composite Connectivity Index: Introducing a new concept in assessing the attractiveness of hub ports," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04046246, HAL.
    19. Wade D. Cook & Moshe Kress, 1990. "A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1302-1310, November.
    20. John J Bartholdi & Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Amar Ramudhin, 2016. "A new connectivity index for container ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 231-249, September.
    21. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Hoffmann, Jan & Sanchez, Ricardo J., 2006. "The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 117-140, January.
    22. Roll, Y & Golany, B., 1993. "Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 99-109, January.
    23. Piyush Tiwari & Hidekazu Itoh & Masayuki Doi, 2003. "Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 23-39, March.
    24. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon & Tongzon, Jose L., 2008. "Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 877-885, November.
    25. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Wei Yim Yap, 2008. "Competition for transhipment containers by major ports in Southeast Asia: slot capacity analysis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 89-101, February.
    26. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla & Friedman, Lea, 1998. "DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 470-478, December.
    27. Chuanxu Wang & Xiaohan Dou & Hercules Haralambides, 2022. "Port centrality and the Composite Connectivity Index: Introducing a new concept in assessing the attractiveness of hub ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 67-91, March.
    28. Peter W. de Langen & Maximiliano Udenio & Jan C. Fransoo & Reima Helminen, 2016. "Port connectivity indices: an application to European RoRo shipping," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, December.
    29. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.
    30. Feo-Valero, María & Martínez-Moya, Julián, 2022. "Shippers vs. freight forwarders: Do they differ in their port choice decisions? Evidence from the Spanish ceramic tile industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    31. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Feo-Valero, María, 2022. "Do shippers’ characteristics influence port choice criteria? Capturing heterogeneity by using latent class models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 96-105.
    32. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Yap, Wei Yim, 2011. "Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysis on East Asia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1272-1281.
    33. Haiying Jia & Ove Daae Lampe & Veronika Solteszova & Siri P. Strandenes, 2017. "Norwegian port connectivity and its policy implications," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 956-966, November.
    34. Ramon Sala-Garrido & Manuel Mocholí-Arce & María Molinos-Senante, 2021. "Assessing the Quality of Service of Water Companies: a ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 371-387, May.
    35. C Kao & H-T Hung, 2005. "Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(10), pages 1196-1203, October.
    36. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    37. M. A. Mueller & B. Wiegmans & J. H. R. Duin, 2020. "The geography of container port choice: modelling the impact of hinterland changes on port choice," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 26-52, March.
    38. Jie Wu & Junfei Chu & Qingyuan Zhu & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2016. "Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1446-1458, December.
    39. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    40. Chathumi Kavirathna & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda, 2018. "Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    41. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    42. Marco Fugazza & Jan Hoffmann, 2017. "Liner shipping connectivity as determinant of trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.
    2. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Feo-Valero, María, 2020. "Measuring foreland container port connectivity disaggregated by destination markets: An index for Short Sea Shipping services in Spanish ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Tocchi, Daniela & Sys, Christa & Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio, 2022. "Hypergraph-based centrality metrics for maritime container service networks: A worldwide application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Chuanxu Wang & Xiaohan Dou & Hercules Haralambides, 2022. "Port centrality and the Composite Connectivity Index: Introducing a new concept in assessing the attractiveness of hub ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 67-91, March.
    7. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    8. Jordi Caballé Valls & Peter W. Langen & Lorena García Alonso & José Ángel Vallejo Pinto, 2020. "Understanding Port Choice Determinants and Port Hinterlands: Findings from an Empirical Analysis of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 53-67, March.
    9. Yap, Wei Yim & Hsieh, Cheng-Hsien & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2023. "Shipping connectivity data analytics: Implications for maritime policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 112-127.
    10. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Jorge Barnett Lawton & Morten Svindland, 2024. "An evolution of the Global Container Shipping Network: port connectivity and trading community structure (2011–2017)," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 283-306, June.
    12. Nicanor García Álvarez & Belarmino Adenso-Díaz & Laura Calzada-Infante, 2021. "Maritime Traffic as a Complex Network: a Systematic Review," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 387-417, June.
    13. Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Amar Ramudhin & Jorge Barnett Lawton, 2023. "A connectivity-based approach to evaluating port importance in the global container shipping network," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 602-622, September.
    14. Samia Bouazza & Zoubida Benmamoun & Hanaa Hachimi, 2023. "Maritime Bilateral Connectivity Analysis for Sustainable Maritime Growth: Case of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. I. Contreras & S. Lozano & M. A. Hinojosa, 2021. "A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2181-2201, September.
    16. Sugimura, Yoshihisa & Akakura, Yasuhiro & Yotsushima, Tatsuki & Kawasaki, Tomoya, 2023. "Evaluation of Japanese port policies through network analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 59-70.
    17. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    18. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Justin Berli, 2020. "Urban gravity in the global container shipping network," Post-Print halshs-02588449, HAL.
    19. Kao, Chiang, 2010. "Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 484-491, December.
    20. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 883-902, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1057_s41278-023-00258-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.