IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v23y2021i1d10.1057_s41278-018-0113-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying expert knowledge to containership stowage planning: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Chang Chou

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

  • Pao-Yi Fang

    (Department of Maritime Information and Technology, National Kaohsiung Marine University)

Abstract

Several maritime accidents have been caused recently by inappropriate stowage planning of cargo ships, specifically large containerships. This study focuses on improving stowage planning to increase navigational safety. Whereas most previous studies have only considered the position of containers in a ship, the stowage planning developed here considers container positions both onboard and at the terminal. The role of navigational safety requirements—such as metacentric height, trim, heel, bending moment, torsional moment, draft and adherence to International Maritime Dangerous Goods code—code has also been largely absent from previous studies. Therefore, our study proposes stowage planning methods that meet the above safety requirements. An empirical stowage planning study, applied to five containerships of an international shipping company, is presented. The five cases illustrate the effectiveness of the stowage planning methods developed in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Chang Chou & Pao-Yi Fang, 2021. "Applying expert knowledge to containership stowage planning: an empirical study," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 4-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-018-0113-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-018-0113-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-018-0113-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-018-0113-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monaco, Maria Flavia & Sammarra, Marcello & Sorrentino, Gregorio, 2014. "The Terminal-Oriented Ship Stowage Planning Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 256-265.
    2. Mordecai Avriel & Michal Penn & Naomi Shpirer & Smadar Witteboon, 1998. "Stowage planning for container ships to reduce the number of shifts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 76(0), pages 55-71, January.
    3. Delgado, Alberto & Jensen, Rune Møller & Janstrup, Kira & Rose, Trine Høyer & Andersen, Kent Høj, 2012. "A Constraint Programming model for fast optimal stowage of container vessel bays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 251-261.
    4. Ding, Ding & Chou, Mabel C., 2015. "Stowage planning for container ships: A heuristic algorithm to reduce the number of shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 242-249.
    5. Akio Imai & Etsuko Nishimura & Stratos Papadimitriou & Kazuya Sasaki, 2002. "The Containership Loading Problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(2), pages 126-148, June.
    6. I D Wilson & P A Roach, 2000. "Container stowage planning: a methodology for generating computerised solutions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(11), pages 1248-1255, November.
    7. Sciomachen, Anna & Tanfani, Elena, 2007. "A 3D-BPP approach for optimising stowage plans and terminal productivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1433-1446, December.
    8. Daniela Ambrosino & Davide Anghinolfi & Massimo Paolucci & Anna Sciomachen, 2009. "A new three-step heuristic for the Master Bay Plan Problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(1), pages 98-120, March.
    9. Chen, C. S. & Lee, S. M. & Shen, Q. S., 1995. "An analytical model for the container loading problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 68-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buddhi A. Weerasinghe & H. Niles Perera & Xiwen Bai, 2024. "Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 307-341, June.
    2. Richard Grant & Landolf Rhode-Barbarigos & Shouraseni Sen Roy & Lucas Britton & Chang Li & Aidan Rowe & Austin Becker & Becky Hope & Michael Bello, 2024. "No port stands alone: PortMiami and the resilience of its Caribbean and Mesoamerican maritime network," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 342-365, June.
    3. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    4. Kevin Cullinane & Hercules Haralambides, 2021. "Global trends in maritime and port economics: the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 369-380, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byung Kwon Lee & Joyce M. W. Low, 2022. "A constraint programming approach to capacity planning in container vessels," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 415-438, June.
    2. Dalia Rashed & Amr Eltawil & Mohamed Gheith, 2021. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Algorithm to Solve the Slot Planning Problem in Container Vessels," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Monaco, Maria Flavia & Sammarra, Marcello & Sorrentino, Gregorio, 2014. "The Terminal-Oriented Ship Stowage Planning Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 256-265.
    4. Parreño, Francisco & Pacino, Dario & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon, 2016. "A GRASP algorithm for the container stowage slot planning problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 141-157.
    5. Ding, Ding & Chou, Mabel C., 2015. "Stowage planning for container ships: A heuristic algorithm to reduce the number of shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 242-249.
    6. R. Roberti & D. Pacino, 2018. "A Decomposition Method for Finding Optimal Container Stowage Plans," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1444-1462, December.
    7. Huiling Zhu, 2022. "Integrated Containership Stowage Planning: A Methodology for Coordinating Containership Stowage Plan and Terminal Yard Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Christensen, Jonas & Erera, Alan & Pacino, Dario, 2019. "A rolling horizon heuristic for the stochastic cargo mix problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 200-220.
    9. Fazi, Stefano, 2019. "A decision-support framework for the stowage of maritime containers in inland shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-23.
    10. Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario, 2017. "A matheuristic for the Cargo Mix Problem with Block Stowage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 151-171.
    11. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Rune Larsen & Dario Pacino, 2021. "A heuristic and a benchmark for the stowage planning problem," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 94-122, March.
    13. Shih-Liang Chao & Pi-Hung Lin, 0. "Minimizing overstowage in master bay plans of large container ships," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    14. Shih-Liang Chao & Pi-Hung Lin, 2021. "Minimizing overstowage in master bay plans of large container ships," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 71-93, March.
    15. Korach, Aleksandra & Brouer, Berit Dangaard & Jensen, Rune Møller, 2020. "Matheuristics for slot planning of container vessel bays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 873-885.
    16. Daniela Ambrosino & Anna Sciomachen, 2021. "A shipping line stowage-planning procedure in the presence of hazardous containers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 49-70, March.
    17. Imai, Akio & Sasaki, Kazuya & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2006. "Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 373-389, June.
    18. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2021. "Joint optimization of container slot planning and truck scheduling for tandem quay cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 149-166.
    19. Sciomachen, Anna & Tanfani, Elena, 2007. "A 3D-BPP approach for optimising stowage plans and terminal productivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1433-1446, December.
    20. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-018-0113-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.