IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v58y2007i1d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing maximum lateness in a flow shop subject to release dates

Author

Listed:
  • M Haouari

    (Ecole Polytechnique de Tunisie)

  • T Ladhari

    (Ecole Polytechnique de Tunisie
    Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales)

Abstract

We consider the problem of minimizing the maximum lateness in a m-machine flow shop subject to release dates. The objective of this paper is to develop a new branch-and-bound algorithm to solve exactly this strongly NP-hard problem. The proposed branch-and-bound algorithm encompasses several features including a procedure for adjusting heads and tails, heuristics, and a lower bounding procedure, which is based on the exact solution of the two-machine flow shop problem with time lags, ready times, and delivery times. Extensive computational experiments show that instances with up to 6000 operations can be solved exactly in a moderate CPU time.

Suggested Citation

  • M Haouari & T Ladhari, 2007. "Minimizing maximum lateness in a flow shop subject to release dates," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(1), pages 62-72, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602092
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602092
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. N. Potts, 1985. "Analysis of Heuristics for Two-Machine Flow-Shop Sequencing Subject to Release Dates," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 576-584, November.
    2. Carlier, Jacques & Rebai, Ismail, 1996. "Two branch and bound algorithms for the permutation flow shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 238-251, April.
    3. Carlier, Jacques, 1987. "Scheduling jobs with release dates and tails on identical machines to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 298-306, June.
    4. M Haouari & T Ladhari, 2000. "Minimising maximum lateness in a two-machine flowshop," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(9), pages 1100-1106, September.
    5. Potts, C. N., 1980. "An adaptive branching rule for the permutation flow-shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 19-25, July.
    6. Leslie A. Hall, 1994. "A Polynomial Approximation Scheme for a Constrained Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 68-85, February.
    7. Cheng, Jinliang & Steiner, George & Stephenson, Paul, 2001. "A computational study with a new algorithm for the three-machine permutation flow-shop problem with release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 559-575, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yadong Wang & Baoqiang Fan & Jingang Zhai & Wei Xiong, 2019. "Two-machine flowshop scheduling in a physical examination center," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 363-374, January.
    2. Cheng, Jinliang & Steiner, George & Stephenson, Paul, 2001. "A computational study with a new algorithm for the three-machine permutation flow-shop problem with release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 559-575, May.
    3. Chatterjee A K & Mukherjee, Saral, 2006. "Unified Concept of Bottleneck," IIMA Working Papers WP2006-05-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. S Yanai & T Fujie, 2006. "A three-machine permutation flow-shop problem with minimum makespan on the second machine," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(4), pages 460-468, April.
    5. Libralesso, Luc & Focke, Pablo Andres & Secardin, Aurélien & Jost, Vincent, 2022. "Iterative beam search algorithms for the permutation flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 217-234.
    6. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    7. M Haouari & T Ladhari, 2003. "A branch-and-bound-based local search method for the flow shop problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(10), pages 1076-1084, October.
    8. Lei Shang & Christophe Lenté & Mathieu Liedloff & Vincent T’Kindt, 2018. "Exact exponential algorithms for 3-machine flowshop scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 227-233, April.
    9. Olivier Ploton & Vincent T’kindt, 2023. "Moderate worst-case complexity bounds for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem using Inclusion–Exclusion," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 137-145, April.
    10. Rios-Mercado, Roger Z. & Bard, Jonathan F., 1998. "Heuristics for the flow line problem with setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 76-98, October.
    11. Blazewicz, Jacek & Domschke, Wolfgang & Pesch, Erwin, 1996. "The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Ladhari, Talel & Rakrouki, Mohamed Ali, 2009. "Heuristics and lower bounds for minimizing the total completion time in a two-machine flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 678-691, December.
    13. Gmys, Jan & Mezmaz, Mohand & Melab, Nouredine & Tuyttens, Daniel, 2020. "A computationally efficient Branch-and-Bound algorithm for the permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 814-833.
    14. Carlier, J. & Pinson, E. & Sahli, A. & Jouglet, A., 2020. "An O(n2) algorithm for time-bound adjustments for the cumulative scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 468-476.
    15. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    16. Mukherjee, Saral & Chatterjee, A.K., 2006. "The average shadow price for MILPs with integral resource availability and its relationship to the marginal unit shadow price," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 53-64, February.
    17. D Bai & L Tang, 2010. "New heuristics for flow shop problem to minimize makespan," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 1032-1040, June.
    18. Zribi, N. & El Kamel, A. & Borne, P., 2008. "Minimizing the makespan for the MPM job-shop with availability constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 151-160, March.
    19. Jacques Carlier & Claire Hanen, 2024. "Measuring the slack between lower bounds for scheduling on parallel machines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 347-377, July.
    20. Pessoa, Luciana S. & Andrade, Carlos E., 2018. "Heuristics for a flowshop scheduling problem with stepwise job objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 950-962.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.