IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v56y2005i11d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint optimization of process improvement investments for supplier–buyer cooperative commerce

Author

Listed:
  • E J Comeaux

    (Louisiana State University)

  • B R Sarker

    (Louisiana State University)

Abstract

This research focuses on supporting the formation of strategic alliances through the concept of cooperative commerce, where suppliers and buyers work together to jointly optimize their business. The general goal of this research is to examine existing cooperative commerce models for obstacles that would hinder their successful implementation into modern industrial applications and to address those shortcomings. Total annual cost equations are formulated to capture the joint total relevant cost of cooperative commerce business relationships. These total joint relevant cost models will include terms that capture the ordering cost, holding cost, and cost of quality, as well as any applicable investment cost for process improvements, consistent with traditional economic order quantity and economic production quantity theory. This research corrects a modelling/computational error found in the literature that led to underestimation of the effectiveness of process improvements in joint economic lot size models by 5–12%. In addition, the models are expanded to accommodate a full range of product quality inspection policies, from 0 to 100% product inspections. Furthermore, the models are modified to account for the cost of scrap generation, as well as the effects of accepting non-conforming product and rejecting conforming product during quality inspections. Once the total cost models are expanded to account for these neglected costs, the joint total relevant cost equations are minimized to find the optimal batch sizes, and the effects of each model extension on the model solution are studied. Results indicate that these extensions have a significant impact on the model results, such as reduced optimal batch sizes and increased optimal fraction conforming product.

Suggested Citation

  • E J Comeaux & B R Sarker, 2005. "Joint optimization of process improvement investments for supplier–buyer cooperative commerce," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(11), pages 1310-1324, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:11:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601889
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601889
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Lu, 1995. "A one-vendor multi-buyer integrated inventory model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 312-323, March.
    2. Affisco, John F. & Javad Paknejad, M. & Nasri, Farrokh, 2002. "Quality improvement and setup reduction in the joint economic lot size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 497-508, November.
    3. Goyal, S. K. & Gunasekaran, A. & Martikainen, T. & Yli-Olli, P., 1993. "Integrating production and quality control policies: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    5. P K Tripathy & W-M Wee & P R Majhi, 2003. "An EOQ model with process reliability considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 549-554, May.
    6. Nye, T. J. & Jewkes, E. M. & Dilts, D. M., 2001. "Optimal investment in setup reduction in manufacturing systems with WIP inventories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 128-141, November.
    7. Hill, Roger M., 1997. "The single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory model with a generalised policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 493-499, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Diponegoro, Ahmad, 2009. "Optimal production plans and shipment schedules in a supply-chain system with multiple suppliers and multiple buyers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 753-773, May.
    2. Glock, Christoph H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 671-686.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B.C. Giri & S. Sharma, 2014. "Lot sizing and unequal-sized shipment policy for an integrated production-inventory system," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 888-901, May.
    2. Affisco, John F. & Javad Paknejad, M. & Nasri, Farrokh, 2002. "Quality improvement and setup reduction in the joint economic lot size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 497-508, November.
    3. Liu, Xingchu & Cetinkaya, Sila, 2007. "A note on "quality improvement and setup reduction in the joint economic lot size model"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 194-204, October.
    4. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    5. Ouyang, Liang-Yuh & Wu, Kun-Shan & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2007. "An integrated vendor-buyer inventory model with quality improvement and lead time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 349-358, July.
    6. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2012. "Lot sizing and quality investment with quality cost analyses for imperfect production and inspection processes with commercial return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 922-933.
    7. Valentini, Giovanni & Zavanella, Lucio, 2003. "The consignment stock of inventories: industrial case and performance analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 215-224, January.
    8. Jung, Jung Woo & Lee, Young Hae, 2010. "Heuristic algorithms for production and transportation planning through synchronization of a serial supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 433-447, April.
    9. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    10. Chung, Chun-Jen & Wee, Hui-Ming, 2008. "Green-component life-cycle value on design and reverse manufacturing in semi-closed supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 528-545, June.
    11. Bylka, Stanislaw, 2003. "Competitive and cooperative policies for the vendor-buyer system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 533-544, January.
    12. Chiou, Chuang-Chun & Yao, Ming-Jong & Tsai, Jenteng, 2007. "A mutually beneficial coordination mechanism for a one-supplier multi-retailers supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 314-328, July.
    13. Kim, Seung-Lae & Ha, Daesung, 2003. "A JIT lot-splitting model for supply chain management: Enhancing buyer-supplier linkage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 1-10, October.
    14. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    15. Hoque, M. A. & Goyal, S. K., 2000. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory system with capacity constraint of the transport equipment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 305-315, May.
    16. Kaya, Onur & Kubalı, Deniz & Örmeci, Lerzan, 2013. "A coordinated production and shipment model in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 120-131.
    17. Sarmah, S.P. & Acharya, D. & Goyal, S.K., 2006. "Buyer vendor coordination models in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Dobos, Imre & Gobsch, Barbara & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2011. "A vendor-purchaser economic lot size problem with remanufacturing and deposit," Discussion Papers 304, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    19. Chung, Chun Jen & Wee, Hui Ming, 2007. "Optimizing the economic lot size of a three-stage supply chain with backordering derived without derivatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 933-943, December.
    20. Lee, Shine-Der & Fu, Yen-Chen, 2014. "Joint production and delivery lot sizing for a make-to-order producer–buyer supply chain with transportation cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 23-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:11:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.