IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorapm/v15y2016i2d10.1057_rpm.2015.49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How anchoring and self-confidence level influence perceived saving on tensile price claim framing

Author

Listed:
  • Landie Qiu

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • David Cranage
  • Anna S Mattila

Abstract

Sales promotion is one of the most commonly used sales techniques by marketers, and promotion framing is critical because the presentation of sales information influences consumers’ perceived savings. This article focuses on one specific type of promotion framing – tensile price claim. It compares customers’ perceived savings on two pairs of tensile price claim framings: minimum framing (save 15 per cent or more) versus maximum framing (save up to 35 per cent), and range framing (save 15–35 per cent) versus average framing (save an average of 25 per cent). On the basis of the literature review, researchers propose a conceptual framework and two hypotheses. A pilot study and a main study were conducted to test the hypotheses. The findings suggest that Anchoring and Adjustment Theory may explain the savings perception process and consumer self-confidence levels moderate perceived savings during this process. Authors also discussed both theoretical and managerial implications of this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Landie Qiu & David Cranage & Anna S Mattila, 2016. "How anchoring and self-confidence level influence perceived saving on tensile price claim framing," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 138-152, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:15:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1057_rpm.2015.49
    DOI: 10.1057/rpm.2015.49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/rpm.2015.49
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/rpm.2015.49?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:173-180 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Levin, Irwin P & Gaeth, Gary J, 1988. "How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 374-378, December.
    3. Mobley, Mary F & Bearden, William O & Teel, Jesse E, 1988. "An Investigation of Individual Responses to Tensile Price Claims," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 273-279, September.
    4. Sanjay K. Dhar & Claudia González-Vallejo & Dilip Soman, 1999. "Modeling the Effects of Advertised Price Claims: Tensile Versus Precise Claims?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 154-177.
    5. Bearden, William O & Hardesty, David M & Rose, Randall L, 2001. "Consumer Self-Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 121-134, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindsey-Mullikin, Joan & Petty, Ross D., 2011. "Marketing tactics discouraging price search: Deception and competition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 67-73, January.
    2. Ailawadi, Kusum L. & Gedenk, Karen & Langer, Tobias & Ma, Yu & Neslin, Scott A., 2014. "Consumer response to uncertain promotions: An empirical analysis of conditional rebates," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 94-106.
    3. Banerjee, Prantosh J. & Tripathi, Sanjeev & Sahay, Arvind, 2016. "When less is better than more: Just-below discount in tensile price promotions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 93-102.
    4. Choi, Sungchul & Park, Sang-June & Qiu, Chun (Martin) & Stanyer, Mike, 2013. "The discount is unfair: Egocentric fairness in risky discounts," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 32-43.
    5. Cornelis, Erlinde & Peter, Paula C., 2017. "The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 102-112.
    6. Daniella Kupor & Kristin Laurin & Chris Janiszewski & J Jeffrey Inman, 2020. "Probable Cause: The Influence of Prior Probabilities on Forecasts and Perceptions of Magnitude [Perceived Intent Motivates People to Magnify Observed Harms]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 833-852.
    7. Xiaolan Qian & Wenchen Han & Junzhong Yang, 2024. "From the DeGroot Model to the DeGroot-Non-Consensus Model: The Jump States and the Frozen Fragment States," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Julie Boyer Dumont, 2010. "Consumer’s Skepticism toward Advertising: the origin of the evil [Le scepticisme du consommateur face à la publicité : les origines du mal]," Post-Print hal-04765223, HAL.
    9. Meloria Meschi & Carla Pace, 2012. "Accounting for Behavioral Biases for Non-biased Demand Estimations," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail, chapter 24, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Shlomo Benartzi & Alessandro Previtero & Richard H. Thaler, 2011. "Annuitization Puzzles," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(4), pages 143-164, Fall.
    11. Dan K. Hsu & Johan Wiklund & Richard D. Cotton, 2017. "Success, Failure, and Entrepreneurial Reentry: An Experimental Assessment of the Veracity of Self–Efficacy and Prospect Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 19-47, January.
    12. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Yeong, Yon Ding, 2003. "Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 349-363, October.
    13. Tomi Rajala, 2019. "Mind the Information Expectation Gap," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 104-125, March.
    14. Johannes D. Hattula & Walter Herzog & Ravi Dhar, 2023. "The impact of touchscreen devices on consumers’ choice confidence and purchase likelihood," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 35-53, March.
    15. Thunström, Linda & Nordström, Jonas, 2012. "The Importance of Taste for Food Demand and the Experienced Taste Effect of Healthy Labels - An experiment on potato chips and bread," HUI Working Papers 68, HUI Research.
    16. Jain, Gaurav & Gaeth, Gary J. & Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay & Levin, Irwin P., 2020. "Revisiting attribute framing: The impact of number roundedness on framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 109-119.
    17. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.
    18. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Comparison of the investment behavior of Kazakhstani and German farmers: An experimental approach," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124650, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Chandukala, Sandeep R. & Dotson, Jeffrey P. & Liu, Qing, 2017. "An Assessment of When, Where and Under What Conditions In-Store Sampling is Most Effective," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 493-506.
    20. Van de Velde, Liesbeth & Verbeke, Wim & Popp, Michael & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2010. "The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5541-5549, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:15:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1057_rpm.2015.49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.