IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jobman/v25y2018i2d10.1057_s41262-017-0064-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of linguistic proximity and diglossia on brand name and slogan extension tendencies in the Turkish, Russian and Arabic contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Djavlonbek Kadirov

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Ahmet Bardakcı

    (İşletme (İngilizce) Bölümü)

  • Murat Kantar

    (Uluslararası Ticaret ve Finansman Bölümü)

Abstract

The impact of linguistic proximity and diglossia on multinational corporations’ visual identity extension strategies in multiple sociolinguistically different markets is investigated. Specifically, this study focuses on a sample of Fortune Global 500 corporations and explores their brand name/slogan extension practices in three distinct linguistic contexts: Turkish, Russian and Arabic. The study reveals that the different levels of linguistic proximity systematically influence brand name adaptation including brand name transliteration, as well as slogan translation and new slogan creation in English. The study also finds that these tendencies non-systematically but significantly vary across the levels of diglossia. Conversely, diglossia systematically influences slogan standardization and new slogan creation in a local language, while the effect of linguistic proximity on these practices is non-systematic.

Suggested Citation

  • Djavlonbek Kadirov & Ahmet Bardakcı & Murat Kantar, 2018. "The impact of linguistic proximity and diglossia on brand name and slogan extension tendencies in the Turkish, Russian and Arabic contexts," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 147-159, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:25:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1057_s41262-017-0064-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41262-017-0064-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41262-017-0064-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41262-017-0064-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aradhna Krishna & Rohini Ahluwalia, 2008. "Language Choice in Advertising to Bilinguals: Asymmetric Effects for Multinationals versus Local Firms," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(4), pages 692-705, August.
    2. T C Melewar & John Saunders, 1999. "International Corporate Visual Identity: Standardization or Localization?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(3), pages 583-598, September.
    3. Schmid, Stefan & Kotulla, Thomas, 2011. "50 years of research on international standardization and adaptation--From a systematic literature analysis to a theoretical framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 491-507, October.
    4. Boddewyn, J. J. & Soehl, Robin & Picard, Jacques, 1986. "Standardization in international marketing: Is Ted Levitt in fact right?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 69-75.
    5. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Isabelle Schuiling, 2004. "Executive Insights: Real Differences Between Local and International Brands: Strategic Implications for International Marketers," Post-Print hal-00781539, HAL.
    6. Samiee, Saeed & Jeong, Insik & Pae, Jae Hyeon & Tai, Susan, 2003. "Advertising standardization in multinational corporations: The subsidiary perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 613-626, August.
    7. Peter G P Walters, 1986. "International Marketing Policy: A Discussion of the Standardization Construct and its Relevance for Corporate Policy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 17(2), pages 55-69, June.
    8. Nils Stieglitz & Thorbjørn Knudsen & Markus C. Becker, 2016. "Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1854-1864, September.
    9. Tina M. Lowrey & L. J. Shrum, 2007. "Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(3), pages 406-414, June.
    10. Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp & Rajeev Batra & Dana L Alden, 2003. "How perceived brand globalness creates brand value," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 34(1), pages 53-65, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaun M. Powell, 2018. "Journal of Brand Management: year end review 2018," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 494-499, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Insik Jeong & Jong-Ho Lee & Eunmi Kim, 2019. "Determinants of brand localization in international markets," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(1), pages 75-100, March.
    2. Kotler, Philip & Manrai, Lalita A. & Lascu, Dana-Nicoleta & Manrai, Ajay K., 2019. "Influence of country and company characteristics on international business decisions: A review, conceptual model, and propositions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 482-498.
    3. Lance Eliot Brouthers & Edward O’Donnell & Dawn L. Keig, 2013. "Isomorphic Pressures, Peripheral Product Attributes and Emerging Market Firm Export Performance," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 687-710, October.
    4. Samiee, Saeed & Jeong, Insik & Pae, Jae Hyeon & Tai, Susan, 2003. "Advertising standardization in multinational corporations: The subsidiary perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 613-626, August.
    5. Witek-Hajduk Marzanna K. & Zaborek Piotr, 2022. "Social media use in international marketing: Impact on brand and firm performance," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(2), pages 121-142, June.
    6. Riefler, Petra, 2012. "Why consumers do (not) like global brands: The role of globalization attitude, GCO and global brand origin," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 25-34.
    7. Victoria Ann SEITZ & Olesia LUPU & Nabil RAZZOUK & Ka Man Carman CHU, 2009. "Print Advertising In The Us And Hong Kong: A Comparative Analysis," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 125-148, November.
    8. Nath, Pravin & Kirca, Ahmet H. & Kim, Saejoon & Andras, Trina Larsen, 2019. "The Effects of Retail Banner Standardization on the Performance of Global Retailers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 30-46.
    9. Maria Palazzo & Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano, 2016. "Identifying new segments from a global branding perspective: a three-country study," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 159-171, December.
    10. Neema P. Kumburu & John Francis Kessy, 2021. "Consumers’ Preference on Imported and Locally Made Furniture in Dar es Salaam and Arusha, Tanzania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(1), pages 23-35, February.
    11. Arup Barua & Alexandra Ioanid, 2020. "Country Brand Equity: The Decision Making of Corporate Brand Architecture in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Indre Pikturniene & Aiste Mackelaite, 2013. "Attitude Formation Towards Local And International Ecological Face And Body Care B.Nds Among Lithuanian Female Consumers," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(1).
    13. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 2021. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1559-1590, October.
    14. Poulis, Konstantinos & Poulis, Efthimios & Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella, 2013. "The role of context in case study selection: An international business perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 304-314.
    15. Sichtmann, Christina & Davvetas, Vasileios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2019. "The relational value of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 597-613.
    16. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 0. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-32.
    17. Pablo Farías, 2021. "The Local Aspect in the Successful Brands in Latin America: Empirical Evidence of Its Prevalence, the Role of Local and Global Companies, and Its Effect on Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Kolbl, Živa & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Zabkar, Vesna, 2020. "Do brand warmth and brand competence add value to consumers? A stereotyping perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-362.
    19. Lynch, John G. & Bradlow, Eric T. & Huber, Joel C. & Lehmann, Donald R., 2015. "Reflections on the replication corner: In praise of conceptual replications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 333-342.
    20. Yang, Deli & Sonmez, Mahmut (Maho) & Li, Qinghai & Duan, Yibing, 2015. "The power of triple contexts on customer-based brand performance—A comparative study of Baidu and Google from Chinese netizens’ perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 11-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jobman:v:25:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1057_s41262-017-0064-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.