IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v19y2016i1d10.1057_crr.2015.26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying an Attribution-Based View of Reputation to Examine Firm Responses to Government Product Ratings

Author

Listed:
  • David Eduardo Cavazos

    (James Madison University)

  • Matthew A Rutherford

    (James Madison University)

  • Karen Patterson

    (Anderson School of Management, University of New Mexico)

Abstract

This study examines how reputation predicts variability in firm political responses to government product ratings. Longitudinal examination of nine automobile manufacturers during National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration crash tests reveals several important findings regarding how reputation is associated with firm responses to product ratings. In particular, high reputation firms implement fewer political responses to ratings declines of high-reputation products while implementing more political responses to ratings declines of low-reputation products. Results suggest that reputation at both the product and firm-levels interact to predict how firms respond to reputation-damaging events such as declining product-safety ratings.

Suggested Citation

  • David Eduardo Cavazos & Matthew A Rutherford & Karen Patterson, 2016. "Applying an Attribution-Based View of Reputation to Examine Firm Responses to Government Product Ratings," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 59-76, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:19:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_crr.2015.26
    DOI: 10.1057/crr.2015.26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/crr.2015.26
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/crr.2015.26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    2. Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens & Cees B. M. Van Riel & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch, 2004. "Reputation Management Capabilities as Decision Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1349-1377, December.
    3. Royston Greenwood & Stan X. Li & Rajshree Prakash & David L. Deephouse, 2005. "Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 661-673, December.
    4. Tomasz Obloj & Laurence Capron, 2011. "Role of resource gap and value appropriation: effect of reputation gap on price premium in online auctions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 447-456, April.
    5. Tomasz Obloj & Laurence Capron, 2011. "Role of Resource Gap and Value Appropriation: Effect of Reputation Gap on Price Premium in Online Auctions," Post-Print hal-00853790, HAL.
    6. Luis L. Martins, 2005. "A Model of the Effects of Reputational Rankings on Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 701-720, December.
    7. Tomasz Obloj & Laurence Capron, 2011. "Role of resource gap and value appropriation: Effect of reputation gap on price premium in online auctions," Post-Print hal-00623858, HAL.
    8. Mooweon Rhee & Pamela R. Haunschild, 2006. "The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 101-117, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Crass & Franz Schwiebacher, 2017. "The importance of trademark protection for product differentiation and innovation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 199-220, June.
    2. Nicole Stofberg & Flore Bridoux & Francesca Ciulli & Niccolò Pisani & Ans Kolk & Marlene Vock, 2021. "A Relational‐Models View to Explain Peer‐to‐Peer Sharing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1033-1069, June.
    3. Kaveh Moghaddam & Thomas Weber & Pouya Seifzadeh & Sara Azarpanah, 2021. "Internal Reputation of the Firm: CEO Retention and Firm Market Performance," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 205-221, November.
    4. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    5. Anne Norheim-Hansen, 2018. "The Virtues of Green Strategies: Some Empirical Support from the Alliance Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1161-1173, September.
    6. Olivier Chatain & Denisa Mindruta, 2017. "Estimating Value Creation from Revealed Preferences: Application to Value-based Strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(10), pages 1964-1985, October.
    7. Anne Norheim-Hansen, 2015. "Are ‘Green Brides’ More Attractive? An Empirical Examination of How Prospective Partners’ Environmental Reputation Affects the Trust-Based Mechanism in Alliance Formation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 813-830, December.
    8. Joao Montez & Francisco Ruiz-Aliseda & Michael D. Ryall, 2018. "Competitive Intensity and Its Two-Sided Effect on the Boundaries of Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2716-2733, June.
    9. Giada Di Stefano & Andrew A. King & Gianmario Verona, 2014. "Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1645-1670, November.
    10. Ramos, Célia & Casado-Molina, Ana & Peláez, José, 2017. "Measuring Air And Terrestrial Transport Company Reputation: Tourism Intangibles Expressed In The Digital Environment," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 5(4), pages 443-462.
    11. Soumya Sarkar & Titas Bhattacharjee, 2017. "Impact of Voluntary Disclosures on Corporate Brand Equity," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 125-136, May.
    12. Mooweon Rhee, 2009. "Does Reputation Contribute to Reducing Organizational Errors? A Learning Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 676-703, June.
    13. Karen D. W. Patterson & David Eduardo Cavazos & Marvin Washington, 2014. "It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Breeda Comyns & Elizabeth Franklin-Johnson, 2018. "Corporate Reputation and Collective Crises: A Theoretical Development Using the Case of Rana Plaza," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 159-183, June.
    15. Lisa Baudot & Joseph A. Johnson & Anna Roberts & Robin W. Roberts, 2020. "Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 197-215, May.
    16. Yoseph, Nir Shlomo, 2018. "The Impact of Environmental Fraud on the Used Car Market: Evidence from Dieselgate," CEPR Discussion Papers 12899, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Rodrigo M. S. Moita & Claudio Paiva, 2013. "Political Price Cycles in Regulated Industries: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 94-121, February.
    18. Scott Gehlbach & Konstantin Sonin & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2010. "Businessman Candidates," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 718-736, July.
    19. Chen Zhou & Shrihari Sridhar & Rafael Becerril-Arreola & Tony Haitao Cui & Yan Dong, 2019. "Promotions as competitive reactions to recalls and their consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 702-722, July.
    20. Carlo Cambini & Yossi Spiegel, 2016. "Investment and Capital Structure of Partially Private Regulated Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 487-515, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:19:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_crr.2015.26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.