IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/es-81-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politización, participación e innovación: socializando la investigación agrícola en Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Córdoba

Abstract

Usando el caso de la trayectoria de la investigación agrícola en Bolivia durante el periodo neoliberal, este artículo argumenta sobre la necesidad de realzar la política en la ciencia, pero diferenciándola entre dos niveles: la política como modo de gobernanza o proyecto político que moldea el proceso científico (macropolítica) y la política como el eterno proceso de contestación y antagonismos en la sociedad (micropolítica). Para apoyar este argumento, nos focalizamos en el caso de la Fundación para la Promoción e Investigación de Productos Andinos (Proinpa) para mostrar cómo el proyecto «macropolítico» del neoliberalismo descentralizó y privatizó los servicios de investigación agrícola, redefiniendo las agendas de investigación y la relación entre investigadores y usuarios finales de la tecnología y cómo, a su vez, los investigadores respondieron a este proyecto, adaptándose y contestando el neoliberalismo en sus prácticas cotidianas (micropolítica).

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Córdoba, 2017. "Politización, participación e innovación: socializando la investigación agrícola en Bolivia," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 44(81), pages 131-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-81-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/download/808/964
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaimowitz, David, 1993. "The role of nongovernmental organizations in agricultural research and technology transfer in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 1139-1150, July.
    2. A. Gandarillas & J. Blajos & G. Aguirre & A. Devaux & G. Thiele, 2007. "Changing paradigms for organising R&D: agricultural research and the creation of the PROINPA Foundation in Bolivia," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 256-276.
    3. B. A. Lundvall, 2007. "National Innovation Systems: From List to Freeman," Chapters, in: Horst Hanusch & Andreas Pyka (ed.), Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, chapter 54, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Diana Córdoba & Kees Jansen & Carolina González, 2014. "The Malleability of Participation: The Politics of Agricultural Research under Neoliberalism in Bolivia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(6), pages 1284-1309, November.
    5. Hartwich, Frank & Jansen, Heinz-Gerhard, 2007. "El rol gubernamental en el proceso de innovación agropecuaria: La experiencia de Bolivia," Research briefs 8sp, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Hartwich, Frank & Alexaki, Anastasia & Baptista, Rene, 2007. "Innovation systems governance in Bolivia: Lessons for agricultural innovation policies," IFPRI discussion papers 732, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Jeffery Bentley, 1994. "Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 11(2), pages 140-150, March.
    8. Devaux, André & Horton, Douglas & Velasco, Claudio & Thiele, Graham & López, Gastón & Bernet, Thomas & Reinoso, Iván & Ordinola, Miguel, 2009. "Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-38, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Córdoba, 2017. "Politization, participation, and innovation:Socializing agricultural research in Bolivia," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 44(81), pages 123-150.
    2. Ton, Giel & Klerkx, Laurens & de Grip, Karin & Rau, Marie-Luise, 2015. "Innovation grants to smallholder farmers: Revisiting the key assumptions in the impact pathways," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-23.
    3. Ortiz, Oscar & Orrego, Ricardo & Pradel, Willy & Gildemacher, Peter & Castillo, Renee & Otiniano, Ronal & Gabriel, Julio & Vallejo, Juan & Torres, Omar & Woldegiorgis, Gemebredin & Damene, Belew & Kak, 2013. "Insights into potato innovation systems in Bolivia, Ethiopia, Peru and Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 73-83.
    4. Pawera, Lukas & Manickam, Ravishankar & Wangungu, Carolyne & Bonnarith, Uon & Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Ramasamy, Srinivasan, 2024. "Guidance on farmer participation in the design, testing and scaling of agricultural innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 460-472, April.
    6. van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2008. "Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(3-4), pages 565-580, December.
    7. Smith A. R. Dossou & Jean Adanguidi & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Rodrigue C. Gbedomon, 2022. "Promotion of beekeeping: Insights from an empirical analysis of three honey value chains in Benin," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 39-59, February.
    8. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    9. Laura Enthoven & Goedele Van den Broeck, 2021. "Promoting Food Safety in Local Value Chains: The Case of Vegetables in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Volker Hoffmann & Kirsten Probst & Anja Christinck, 2007. "Farmers and researchers: How can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(3), pages 355-368, September.
    11. Cyrille Kamdem, 2016. "Collective Marketing and Cocoa Farmer's Price in Cameroon," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2535-2555.
    12. Jorge Nogueira de Paiva Britto & Leonardo Costa Ribeiro & Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque, 2021. "Global systems of innovation: introductory notes on a new layer and a new hierarchy in innovation systems," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2-3), pages 259-279, September.
    13. Latynskiy, Evgeny & Berger, Thomas, 2012. "An Agent-Based Network Approach For Understanding, Analyzing And Supporting Rural Producer Organizations In Agriculture," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 137383, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    14. Thompson, John, 1995. "Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: Facilitating the process of institutional change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(9), pages 1521-1554, September.
    15. Giel Ton, 2017. "Contribution analysis of a Bolivian innovation grant fund: mixing methods to verify relevance, efficiency and effectiveness," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 120-143, January.
    16. Douglas Horton & Beatrice Akello & Lucy Aliguma & Thomas Bernet & Andre Devaux & Berga Lemaga & Damalie Magala & Sarah Mayanja & Immaculate Sekitto & Graham Thiele & Claudio Velasco, 2010. "Developing capacity for agricultural market chain innovation: Experience with the 'PMCA' in Uganda," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 367-389.
    17. Shikha N. Khera & Karishma Gulati, 2015. "Training Methods and Tacit Knowledge Sharing: Evidence from IT Organizations," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 4(1-2), pages 11-26, June.
    18. Antonella Samoggia & Francesca Monticone & Gianandrea Esposito, 2022. "Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Huong, Pham Thi Mai & Hau, Nguyen Van & Kaufmann, Brigitte & Valle-Zarate, Anne & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2009. "Emerging supply chains of indigenous pork and their impacts on small-scale farmers in upland areas of Vietnam," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51628, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. The WorldFish Center, 2011. "CGIAR Research Program. Aquatic agricultural systems. Program proposal," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 39556, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-81-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.