IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ozl/journl/v14y2011i2p123-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is using regular flexible leave associated with employee wellbeing?

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Troup

    (The University of Queensland)

Abstract

The use of flexible arrangements will likely increase with the Labour government’s introduction of the National Employment Standards which provide employees with caring responsibilities the right to request flexible arrangements. Data come from a sample of public servants (n=2168) surveyed in 2008, providing a unique setting to investigate the implementation process associated with work life balance policy. Results showed that employees who regularly used flexible leave compared with non users reported lower work interference in home life. The study found some interesting differences among men and women. Men appeared to benefit more than women from these arrangements. Mothers benefit but not when they work long hours. Users compared to non users perceived a more supportive and equitable workplace culture, which were stronger predictors of wellbeing than utilisation alone, highlighting the importance of creating an inclusive workplace culture to obtain positive outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Troup, 2011. "Is using regular flexible leave associated with employee wellbeing?," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 14(2), pages 123-138.
    • Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:123-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ftprepec.drivehq.com/ozl/journl/downloads/AJLE142troup.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Henry, Lesley C., 2009. "Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Bardoel, E Anne & Cieri, Helen De & Mayson, Susan, 2008. "Bridging the research–practice gap: Developing a measurement framework for work–life initiatives," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 239-258, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Dixon & Cathy Banwell & Lyndall Strazdins & Lara Corr & John Burgess, 2019. "Flexible employment policies, temporal control and health promoting practices: A qualitative study in two Australian worksites," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Iseke, Anja & Becker-Özcamlica, Hürrem, 2020. "Branded Employee Behaviour as a Double-Edged Sword: How Perceptions of Service Employees Impact Job Seekers' Application Intentions," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(4), pages 205-215.
    2. Turker Tugsal, 2017. "Work-Life Balance and Social Support as Predictors of Burnout: An Exploratory Analysis," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(3), pages 117-138, March.
    3. repec:ehu:cuader:49127 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Rosaly Franksiska* & Nugraheni Bomba, 2018. "Worklife Balance on Woman With Flexible and Non-Flexible Working Arrangement," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 698-705:2.
    5. Mohsin, Asad & Lengler, Jorge & Aguzzoli, Roberta, 2015. "Staff turnover in hotels: Exploring the quadratic and linear relationships," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 35-48.
    6. Zuzana Lušňáková & Silvia Lenčéšová & Veronika Hrdá & Mária Šajbidorová, 2020. "Innovative Processes Within Communication and Motivation, Work Environment Care and Creativity Support of Human Resources," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 395-405.
    7. DuckJung Shin & Jackson Enoh, 2020. "Availability and Use of Work–Life Balance Programs: Relationship with Organizational Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Meng Hsien Lee & Yii-Ching Lee & Chih-Hsuan Huang & Cheng-Feng Wu & Hsiu-Wen Hsueh & Hsin-Hung Wu, 2022. "A Longitudinal Study of Nurses’ Work-Life Balance: a Case of a Regional Teaching Hospital in Taiwan," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 93-108, February.
    9. Masood Badri & Mugheer Al Khaili & Guang Yang & Muna Al Bahar & Asma Al Rashdi, 2022. "Examining the Structural Effect of Working Time on Well-Being: Evidence from Abu Dhabi," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 24-44, September.
    10. Dr. Najia Shaikh & Prof. Dr. Javed Ahmed Chandio, 2024. "Work-Life Balance Policies and Organizational Outcomes: A Qualitative Investigation," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 475-481.
    11. Jose Maria Biedma Ferrer & Jose Aurelio Medina Garrido, 2023. "Impact of family-friendly HRM policies in organizational performance," Papers 2311.14358, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    12. Nadja Meyer & Rozália Suliková, 2018. "Motivating by Flexibility: Which Role Plays the Company’s Culture," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    13. Tanja van der Lippe & Laura den Dulk & Katia Begall, 2024. "Flextime/Flexspace for All in the Organization? A Study of the Availability, Use, and Consequences of Flexible Work Arrangements for Low and High SES Employees in Nine European Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    14. José-Luis Rodríguez-Sánchez & Thais González-Torres & Antonio Montero-Navarro & Rocío Gallego-Losada, 2020. "Investing Time and Resources for Work–Life Balance: The Effect on Talent Retention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Heejung Chung, 2020. "Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 521-545, September.
    16. Natalia Nehrebecka & Aneta Dzik-Walczak, 2019. "Collateral and Bank Credit - a Puzzle," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejes_v5_i.
    17. James Gerard Caillier, 2017. "Do Work-Life Benefits Enhance the Work Attitudes of Employees? Findings from a Panel Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 393-408, September.
    18. José Aurelio Medina-Garrido & José María Biedma-Ferrer & Jaime Sánchez-Ortiz, 2020. "I Can’t Go to Work Tomorrow! Work-Family Policies, Well-Being and Absenteeism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Amna Yousaf & Qasim Ali Nisar & Shahzad Ali & Aamir Zamir Kamboh & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain, 2019. "Do High-Performance Work Practices Influence Organizational Innovation? Mediating Role of Human Capital," Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 7(1), pages :107-120, March.
    20. Kapo Wong & Alan H. S. Chan & Pei-Lee Teh, 2020. "How Is Work–Life Balance Arrangement Associated with Organisational Performance? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    21. Lina Vyas & Francis Cheung & Hang-Yue Ngo & Kee-Lee Chou, 2022. "Family-Friendly Policies: Extrapolating A Pathway towards Better Work Attitudes and Work Behaviors in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health; Industry Studies; Regulation and Industrial Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
    • L88 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Government Policy
    • L59 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:123-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sandie Rawnsley (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/becurau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.