IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxviiiy2018i2p293-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demographic Evolutions Premise for Digital Innovation in Health

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Mihaela

    (The Bucharest University of Economics Studies)

  • ÈšiÈ›an Emilia

    (The Institute of National Economy)

  • Manea Daniela-Ioana

    (The Bucharest University of Economics Studies)

Abstract

Whether we like it or not, technology has become part of our lives and, at the same time, it has undoubtedly helped people become more informed and connected. Reducing healthcare costs and improving patient outcomes are benefits of implementing modern technologies in the medical sector. Digital health can significantly improve the productivity of an organization or nation, including at the individual level, and if digital healthcare solutions are made at an affordable cost, digital health could be a response to emerging market challenges to grow sustainable and improve health systems to provide patient-centred care, meaning accessibility and quality. This paper assesses trends in demographic evolution and their influence on digital health innovation as well as emerging trends as a result of healthy aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Mihaela & ÈšiÈ›an Emilia & Manea Daniela-Ioana, 2018. "Demographic Evolutions Premise for Digital Innovation in Health," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 293-298, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xviii:y:2018:i:2:p:293-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/18-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2016. "Department Publications 2014," Publications Lists 239845, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. United Nations (UN), 2016. "International Migration and Development," Working Papers id:11048, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Norton, Max & Baumgartner, Kendra, 2018. "An ounce of prevention and a pound of cure: the substitutability or complementarity of grapevine trunk disease management practices," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274361, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Karl McShane, 2017. "Getting Used to Diversity? Immigration and Trust in Sweden," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1895-1910.
    3. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    4. Evelina A. Zimovetz & Alain Joseph & Rajeev Ayyagari & Josephine A. Mauskopf, 2018. "A cost-effectiveness analysis of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the UK," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(1), pages 21-35, January.
    5. Robert Koulish, 2016. "Using Risk to Assess the Legal Violence of Mandatory Detention," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
    6. José Armando Cobián Álvarez & Budy P. Resosudarmo, 2019. "The cost of floods in developing countries’ megacities: a hedonic price analysis of the Jakarta housing market, Indonesia," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(4), pages 555-577, October.
    7. Marguerite DeLiema & Jeanine Yonashiro-Cho & Zach D Gassoumis & Yongjie Yon & Ken J Conrad, 2018. "Using Latent Class Analysis to Identify Profiles of Elder Abuse Perpetrators," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 49-58.
    8. Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2017. "Environmental Impacts of Sand Exploitation. Analysis of Sand Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    9. D. Lee & A. Amadi & J. Sabater & J. Ellis & H. Johnson & S. Kotapati & S. McNamara & A. Walker & M. Cooper & K. Patterson & N. Roskell & Y. Meng, 2019. "Can We Accurately Predict Cost Effectiveness Without Access to Overall Survival Data? The Case Study of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Melanoma in," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 43-54, March.
    10. Huh, Hyeon-Seung & Park, Cyn-Young, 2018. "Asia-Pacific regional integration index: Construction, interpretation, and comparison," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-38.
    11. Jelena Ruso & Ana Horvat & Milica Marièiæ, 2019. "Do international standards influence the development of smart regions and cities?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 629-652.
    12. Philipp Aerni, 2016. "Coping with Migration-Induced Urban Growth: Addressing the Blind Spot of UN Habitat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Massimo Fabiani & Gianluigi Ferrante & Valentina Minardi & Cristina Giambi & Flavia Riccardo & Silvia Declich & Maria Masocco, 2017. "Comparison of rubella immunization rates in immigrant and Italian women of childbearing age: Results from the Italian behavioral surveillance system PASSI (2011-2015)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. John H. Fleming & Neli Esipova & Anita Pugliese & Julie Ray & Rajesh Srinivasan, 2018. "DATA-SURVEY: Migrant Acceptance Index: A Global Examination of the Relationship Between Interpersonal Contact and Attitudes toward Migrants," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 8(1), pages 103-132, January-J.
    15. B Ian Hutchins & Xin Yuan & James M Anderson & George M Santangelo, 2016. "Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    16. BARCEVICIUS Egidijus & CIBAITE Guonda & CODAGNONE Cristiano & GINEIKYTE Vaida & KLIMAVICIUTE Luka & LIVA Giovanni & MATULEVIC Loreta & MISURACA Gianluca & VANINI Irene, 2019. "Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC118857, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Gina Ziervogel & Anna Cowen & John Ziniades, 2016. "Moving from Adaptive to Transformative Capacity: Building Foundations for Inclusive, Thriving, and Regenerative Urban Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Manfred Spiesberger & Javier Gomez Prieto & Isabelle Seigneur, 2018. "Smart specialisation and social innovation: from policy relations to opportunities and challenges," JRC Research Reports JRC111371, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Kexi Pan & Yongfu Li & Hanxiong Zhu & Anrong Dang, 2017. "Spatial Configuration of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Shanghai, and Our Policy Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Zornitsa Stoyanova & Ivelina Petkova & Kristina Todorova, 2018. "Risk Management Strategies in Water Projects in Bulgaria," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 228-238, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital innovation; demographic change; welfare; well being;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xviii:y:2018:i:2:p:293-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.