IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v100y1985isupplementp915-934..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for Identifying the Public Good Allocation Process Within a Group

Author

Listed:
  • Martin C. McGuire
  • Carl H. Groth

Abstract

This paper develops a method for inferring from observations on a group's collective expenditure whether a cooperative or competitive resource allocation process, or some mixture of the two, has occurred. The method will be applicable to a variety of situations from small collectives such as the family or groupings of nations collaborating in security or trade alliances, to collectives with large numbers. This method will be useful for identifying (1) whether observed outcomes have been efficient, (2) whether costs have been shared equitably, (3) what is the form of collaboration or competition, and (4) what is the degree of "publicness" of the collective good.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin C. McGuire & Carl H. Groth, 1985. "A Method for Identifying the Public Good Allocation Process Within a Group," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 100(Supplemen), pages 915-934.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:100:y:1985:i:supplement:p:915-934.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/100.Supplement.915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hansen, Laurna Jane, 1988. "Conventional versus strategic expenditures in NATO: a public goods approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1988010108000017600, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Justin George & Todd Sandler, 2021. "EU Demand for Defense, 1990–2019: A Strategic Spatial Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler, 2001. "Economics of Alliances: The Lessons for Collective Action," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 869-896, September.
    4. Brunner, Eric & Sonstelie, Jon, 2003. "School finance reform and voluntary fiscal federalism," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(9-10), pages 2157-2185, September.
    5. Conybeare, John A C & Murdoch, James C & Sandler, Todd, 1994. "Alternative Collective-Goods Models of Military Alliances: Theory and Empirics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(4), pages 525-542, October.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/fvtnkmt15tlkfv89pa9098csn is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Martial Foucault, 2006. "Europe de la Défense. Quel processus d'allocation ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 407-417.
    8. Nakagawa, Shintaro, 2019. "On the Maximum Number of Players Voluntarily Contributing to Two or More Public Goods," MPRA Paper 92719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/fvtnkmt15tlkfv89pa9098csn is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Martial Foucault, 2006. "Europe de la Défense," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03462142, HAL.
    11. Martial Foucault, 2005. "Biens publics et défense européenne : quel processus d'allocation ?," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques j05082, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    12. Minoru Okamura, 2022. "Identifying the public goods allocation process: case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1707-1726, September.
    13. Snyder, Susan K., 1999. "Testable restrictions of Pareto optimal public good provision," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 97-119, January.
    14. Todd Sandler, 1993. "The Economic Theory of Alliances," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(3), pages 446-483, September.
    15. Richard Cornes & Roger Hartley, 2007. "Aggregative Public Good Games," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(2), pages 201-219, April.
    16. Gupta, Rupayan, 2010. "Changing Threat Perceptions and the Efficient Provisioning of International Security," MPRA Paper 24016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Todd Sandler & John Posnett, 1991. "The Private Provision of Public Goods: a Perspective on Neutrality," Public Finance Review, , vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, January.
    18. Martial Foucault, 2006. "Europe de la Défense," Post-Print hal-03462142, HAL.
    19. Glenn Palmer & J. Sky David, 1999. "Multiple Goals or Deterrence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(6), pages 748-770, December.
    20. John R. Oneal, 1990. "Testing the Theory of Collective Action," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(3), pages 426-448, September.
    21. William Gates & Katsuaki Terasawa, 2003. "Reconsidering publicness in alliance defence expenditures: NATO expansion and burden sharing," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 369-383.
    22. Justin George & Todd Sandler, 2022. "NATO defense demand, free riding, and the Russo-Ukrainian war in 2022," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 783-806, December.
    23. Raechelle Mascarenhas & Todd Sandler, 2006. "Do donors cooperatively fund foreign aid?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 337-357, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:100:y:1985:i:supplement:p:915-934.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.