IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v36y1984i0p13-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mr. Hicks and the Classics

Author

Listed:
  • Solow, R M

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Solow, R M, 1984. "Mr. Hicks and the Classics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(0), pages 13-25, Supplemen.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:36:y:1984:i:0:p:13-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28198411%292%3A36%3C13%3AMHATC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Bianco, 2016. "Hicks’s thread (out of the equilibrium labyrinth)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(4), pages 1229-1245.
    2. Edward Nelson, 2004. "Money and the Transmission Mechanism in the Optimizing IS-LM Specification," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 271-304, Supplemen.
    3. Nguyen-Huu, Adrien & Pottier, Antonin, 2020. "Hicksian traverse revisited: Conditions for the energy transition," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 102-111.
    4. Korkut A. Erturk, 2006. "Asset Price Bubbles, Liquidity Preference And The Business Cycle," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 239-256, May.
    5. Koutsobinas, Theodore, 2011. "Animal spirits, liquidity-preference and Keynesian behavioural macroeconomics: An intertemporal framework," MPRA Paper 43027, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Don Patinkin, 1988. "In Defense of IS-LM," UCLA Economics Working Papers 537, UCLA Department of Economics.
    7. Hukukane Nikaido, 2001. "Transition from the classical to the Keynesian Perspective," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 526-546.
    8. David Colander & Casey Rothschild, 2009. "Complexity and Macro Pedagogy: The Complexity Vision as a Bridge between Graduate and Undergraduate Macro," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Giuseppe Fontana & Mark Setterfield (ed.), Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy, chapter 6, pages 118-128, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Henry, Jacques & Lavoie, Marc, 2002. "La traverse de Hicks dans son modèle horizontal bisectoriel : le réaménagement de la structure productive," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 78(1), pages 87-114, Mars.
    10. Ingo Barens & Volker Caspari, 1999. "Old views and new perspectives: on reading Hick's 'Mr. Keynes and the Classics'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 216-241.
    11. Rancan, Antonella, 2012. "Modigliani's 1944 Wage Rigidity Assumption and the Construction of the Neoclassical Synthesis," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp12069, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    12. Gary Mongiovi, 2001. "The Cambridge Tradition in Economics: An interview with G. C. Harcourt," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 503-521.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:36:y:1984:i:0:p:13-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.