IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v32y2006i4p519-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exemplars or Beliefs? The Impact of Self-View on the Nature and Relative Influence of Brand Associations

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Ng
  • Michael J. Houston

Abstract

This research examines whether various forms of brand associations-overall brand beliefs (e.g., Sony is high quality) versus exemplars of the brand (e.g., Sony TV)-are differentially accessible for individuals with independent self-views and those with an interdependent self-view. Since independents emphasize the "traitedness" of behavior and tend to focus on attributes of objects, brand beliefs are relatively more accessible than exemplars to them. Conversely, since interdependents focus more on the role of contextual factors and the interrelatedness of events, exemplars are relatively more accessible to them than brand beliefs. Further, examination of the implications of this difference on brand attitudes and brand extension evaluations occurs. (c) 2006 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Ng & Michael J. Houston, 2006. "Exemplars or Beliefs? The Impact of Self-View on the Nature and Relative Influence of Brand Associations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(4), pages 519-529, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:32:y:2006:i:4:p:519-529
    DOI: 10.1086/500482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500482
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/500482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Beichen & Kale, Sudhir H., 2012. "Cultural differences in imagery generation: The influence of abstract versus concrete thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 333-339.
    2. Koo, Minkyung & Shavitt, Sharon & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, 2020. "Engaging in a culturally mismatched thinking style increases the preference for familiar consumer options for analytic but not holistic thinkers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 837-852.
    3. Ulrich, Isabelle & Azar, Salim L. & Aimé, Isabelle, 2020. "Stay close but not too close: The role of similarity in the cross-gender extension of patronymic brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 157-174.
    4. Anne-Madeleine Kranzbühler & Mirella H. P. Kleijnen & Peeter W. J. Verlegh, 2019. "Outsourcing the pain, keeping the pleasure: effects of outsourced touchpoints in the customer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 308-327, March.
    5. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    6. Chang, Yaping & Gao, Yajie & Zhu, Donghong & Safeer, Asif Ali, 2023. "Social robots: Partner or intruder in the home? The roles of self-construal, social support, and relationship intrusion in consumer preference," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Böger, Daniel & Kottemann, Pascal & Meißner, Martin & Decker, Reinhold, 2017. "A mechanism for aggregating association network data: An application to brand concept maps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 90-106.
    8. Pronobesh Banerjee, 2021. "Brand Representation Over Time," Working papers 443, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    9. Myung Ko & Kweku-Muata & Carlos Dorantesa, 2008. "Planning Technology Investments For High Payoffs: A Rational Expectations Approach To Gauging Potential And Realized Value In A Changing Environment," Working Papers 0040, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    10. Sung Youl Jun & Hye Kyung Park & Kyung Ho Kim, 2022. "The effects of nostalgia marketing on consumers’ brand extension evaluation," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 271-286, May.
    11. Beichen Liang & Joseph Cherian, 2014. "American And Chinese Thinking Styles: Attitude Effects On Holistic And Attribute Ads," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 5(1).
    12. Lee, Byung-Kwan & Lee, Wei-Na, 2016. "The effect of structural alignment on choice-process satisfaction and preference formation: The moderating role of self-construal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2747-2755.
    13. Voyer, Benjamin G. & Kastanakis, Minas N. & Rhode, Ann Kristin, 2017. "Co-creating stakeholder and brand identities: A cross-cultural consumer perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 399-410.
    14. Kevin Lane Keller, 2016. "Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Alokparna (Sonia) Basu Monga & Deborah Roedder John, 2008. "WHEN DOES NEGATIVE BRAND PUBLICITY HURT? The Moderating Influence of Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking," Working Papers 0044, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    16. Jae Jin Lee & Sung-Jun Lee, 2017. "The Differences of Asian and Western Consumers’ Attitudes towards Brand Extensions by Information Types: Attributerelated versus Non-attribute-related Information," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 281-290.
    17. Jouba Hmaida, 2009. "La conception de soi : une contribution à la littérature française en Marketing," Post-Print hal-02320955, HAL.
    18. Paul W. Miniard & Rama K. Jayanti & Cecilia M. O. Alvarez & Peter R. Dickson, 2018. "What brand extensions need to fully benefit from their parental heritage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 948-963, September.
    19. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    20. Pronobesh Banerjee, 2021. "Temporal Construal and Brand Categorization," Working papers 444, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:32:y:2006:i:4:p:519-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.