IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v11y2002i4p761-789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing in the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Baldwin
  • David Sabourin

Abstract

This paper investigates the evolution of industrial structure in Canadian manufacturing and its relationship to technological change. It does so by examining the extent to which plants that make greater use of advanced technologies experience higher growth in market share and productivity. Using recent survey data on technology use at the plant level, the study finds that establishments that had adopted advanced manufacturing technologies by the end of the 1990s, particularly network communications technologies, had superior productivity growth throughout the decade. In turn, gains in relative productivity were accompanied by gains in market share. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Baldwin & David Sabourin, 2002. "Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing in the 1990s," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(4), pages 761-789, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:11:y:2002:i:4:p:761-789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantin Fursov & Alina Kadyrova, 2017. "How the analysis of transitionary references in knowledge networks and their centrality characteristics helps in understanding the genesis of growing technology areas," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1947-1963, June.
    2. Sandulli, Francesco D. & Baker, Paul M.A. & López-Sánchez, José I., 2013. "Can small and medium enterprises benefit from skill-biased technological change?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1976-1982.
    3. Tiago Cardao-Pito, 2017. "Organizations as Producers of Operating Product Flows to Members of Society," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    4. Baldwin, John R., 2004. "Productivité : l'évolution du programme de Statistique Canada," Analyse économique : documents sur la méthodologie - Comptes nationaux 2004002f, Statistics Canada, Division de l'analyse économique.
    5. John Baldwin & Beiling Yan, 2012. "Market Expansion and Productivity Growth: Do New Domestic Markets Matter as Much as New International Markets?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 469-491, June.
    6. Baldwin, John R. Gellatly, Guy, 2006. "Capacités d'innovation : le capital de savoir, gage de survie et de croissance des entreprises," L'économie canadienne en transition 2006013f, Statistics Canada, Division de l'analyse économique.
    7. Baldwin, John R. Gellatly, Guy, 2007. "Global Links: Multinationals in Canada: An Overview of Research at Statistics Canada," The Canadian Economy in Transition 2007014e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Division.
    8. Kashan Pirzada & Monir Ahmed, 2013. "Effect of New Technology on Firms Business Objectives: A Case Study of Pak-Suzuki Company," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 95-101, May.
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Marco Faillo & Luigi Marengo, 2003. "Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms. An Introduction," LEM Papers Series 2003/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Centre for the Study of Living Standards, 2005. "What Explains the Canada-US ICT Investment Intensity Gap?," CSLS Research Reports 2005-06, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    11. Baldwin, John R. Gellatly, Guy, 2006. "Innovation Capabilities: The Knowledge Capital Behind the Survival and Growth of Firms," The Canadian Economy in Transition 2006013e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Division.
    12. Stornelli, Aldo & Ozcan, Sercan & Simms, Christopher, 2021. "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and innovation: A systematic literature review on barriers, enablers, and innovation types," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    13. Francesco D. Sandulli & Paul M.A. Baker & José I. López-Sánchez, 2014. "Jobs mismatch and productivity impact of information technology," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(13), pages 1060-1074, September.
    14. Bunea Ovidiu-Iulian, 2019. "Repositioning sales as an influence on innovation and a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 492-504, May.
    15. Mohnen, Pierre, 2019. "R&D, innovation and productivity," MERIT Working Papers 2019-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Michael P. Keane & Susan E. Feinberg, 2007. "Advances In Logistics And The Growth Of Intra‐Firm Trade: The Case Of Canadian Affiliates Of U.S. Multinationals, 1984–1995," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 571-632, December.
    17. Elad Gafni, 2005. "The Diffusion and Adoption of Advanced Technologies in Canada: An Overview of the Issues," CSLS Research Reports 2005-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    18. Ndubuisi, Gideon & Avenyo, Elvis, 2018. "Estimating the effects of robotization on exports," MERIT Working Papers 2018-046, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:11:y:2002:i:4:p:761-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.