IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v17y2022ip1075-1084..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon sink price prediction based on radial basis kernel function support vector machine regression model
[Chaos and order in the capital markets]

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Yang
  • Jun-long Mi
  • Jin Jiang
  • Jia-wen Li
  • Quan-shen Zhang
  • Meng-meng Geng

Abstract

At present, the main pricing methods for carbon sink trading are marginal cost pricing, shadow price pricing and physical option pricing. The most serious defect of these three methods is that their theoretical basis is the extremely idealized effective market hypothesis, which obviously does not conform to the fractal and chaotic behavior characteristics of the actual carbon sink trading market. It is particularly important to study new pricing technologies and methods for a complex, nonlinear and dissipative system. Therefore, this paper constructs a carbon sink price prediction method based on the radial basis kernel function support vector machine (RBF-SVM) model. The main findings are the following:• Compared with the build nonlinear support vector machine (SVM) models by the three kernel functions: linear kernel function (LF), radial basis function (RBF) and sigmoid kernel function, the RBF-SVM has the highest prediction accuracy.• The adaptability of the RBF-SVM model is tested by using the price fluctuation data of EU allowance (EUA). It is proved that the adaptability of the RBF-SVM model for the price predictions of heterogeneous carbon products is also excellent.• The forecast results of the RBF-SVM model for carbon sink price for the period of September 2021 to August 2022 show that the lowest carbon sink price of 20 euros is expected to occur around November 2021 and the highest price of 38.5 euros around August 2022.Therefore, the established RBF-SVM model can be used for carbon sink trading market price prediction, which is more scientific and applicable than the previous three methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Yang & Jun-long Mi & Jin Jiang & Jia-wen Li & Quan-shen Zhang & Meng-meng Geng, 2022. "Carbon sink price prediction based on radial basis kernel function support vector machine regression model [Chaos and order in the capital markets]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 1075-1084.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:17:y:2022:i::p:1075-1084.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctac088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoit Mandelbrot & Howard M. Taylor, 1967. "On the Distribution of Stock Price Differences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 1057-1062, December.
    2. Xavier Gabaix, 2016. "Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 185-206, Winter.
    3. Miao Zhenjian & Kofi Baah Boamah & Xingle Long, 2020. "Research on entropy generation strategy and its application in carbon trading market," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1992-2000, July.
    4. Baillie, Richard T., 1996. "Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 5-59, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2003:i:31:p:1-12 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jonas Mockus, 2010. "On simulation of optimal strategies and Nash equilibrium in the financial market context," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 129-143, September.
    3. Giorgio Canarella & Luis A. Gil-Alana & Rangan Gupta & Stephen M. Miller, 2022. "Globalization, long memory, and real interest rate convergence: a historical perspective," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 2331-2355, November.
    4. Chen, Zhimin & Ibragimov, Rustam, 2019. "One country, two systems? The heavy-tailedness of Chinese A- and H- share markets," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 115-141.
    5. Pierre Perron & Zhongjun Qu, 2007. "An Analytical Evaluation of the Log-periodogram Estimate in the Presence of Level Shifts," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series wp2007-044, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    6. Derek Bond & Michael J. Harrison & Edward J. O'Brien, 2005. "Testing for Long Memory and Nonlinear Time Series: A Demand for Money Study," Trinity Economics Papers tep20021, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    7. Youwei Li & Xue-Zhong He, 2005. "Long Memory, Heterogeneity, and Trend Chasing," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 113, Society for Computational Economics.
    8. Scalas, Enrico & Kaizoji, Taisei & Kirchler, Michael & Huber, Jürgen & Tedeschi, Alessandra, 2006. "Waiting times between orders and trades in double-auction markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 366(C), pages 463-471.
    9. Ra l De Jes s Guti rrez & Lidia E. Carvajal Guti rrez & Oswaldo Garcia Salgado, 2023. "Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Estimation for Mexico s Isthmus Crude Oil Using Long-Memory GARCH-EVT Combined Approaches," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 467-480, July.
    10. Christos Christodoulou-Volos & Fotios Siokis, 2006. "Long range dependence in stock market returns," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(18), pages 1331-1338.
    11. Paulo Ferreira & Éder J.A.L. Pereira & Hernane B.B. Pereira, 2020. "From Big Data to Econophysics and Its Use to Explain Complex Phenomena," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-10, July.
    12. Luis A. Gil-Alana & Antonio Moreno & Seonghoon Cho, 2012. "The Deaton paradox in a long memory context with structural breaks," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(25), pages 3309-3322, September.
    13. Naimoli, Antonio, 2022. "Modelling the persistence of Covid-19 positivity rate in Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    14. Mehmet Dalkir, 2005. "A New Method For Estimating The Order Of Integration Of Fractionally Integrated Processes Using Bispectra," Econometrics 0507001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jul 2005.
    15. Richard T. Baillie & Fabio Calonaci & Dooyeon Cho & Seunghwa Rho, 2019. "Long Memory, Realized Volatility and HAR Models," Working Papers 881, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. Muniandy, Sithi V. & Uning, Rosemary, 2006. "Characterization of exchange rate regimes based on scaling and correlation properties of volatility for ASEAN-5 countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 371(2), pages 585-598.
    17. Boubaker Heni & Canarella Giorgio & Gupta Rangan & Miller Stephen M., 2017. "Time-varying persistence of inflation: evidence from a wavelet-based approach," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Luis A. Gil-Alana & Carlos Poza, 2021. "Cycles and Long-Range Behaviour in the European Stock Markets," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, in: Gilles Dufrénot & Takashi Matsuki (ed.), Recent Econometric Techniques for Macroeconomic and Financial Data, pages 293-302, Springer.
    19. Alvarez-Ramirez, Jose & Alvarez, Jesus & Rodriguez, Eduardo, 2008. "Short-term predictability of crude oil markets: A detrended fluctuation analysis approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2645-2656, September.
    20. Bremus, Franziska & Ludolph, Melina, 2021. "The nexus between loan portfolio size and volatility: Does bank capital regulation matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    21. Rocha Souza, Leonardo & Jorge Soares, Lacir, 2007. "Electricity rationing and public response," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 296-311, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:17:y:2022:i::p:1075-1084.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.