IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i1p152-160..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age Takes Hold of Us by Surprise: Conceptualizing Vulnerabilities in Aging as the Timing of Adverse Events
[Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study]

Author

Listed:
  • Bram Vanhoutte
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

Objectives: Aging in the public eye can be distilled to a limited number of adverse events, such as loss of health, partnership and wealth. While these events are a constitutive part of “normal aging,” they do not occur uniformly at the same time point in the life course. This study investigates to what extent bereavement, functional health loss, and onset of poverty are adequate markers of aging, and illustrates inequalities in their timing according to cohort, gender, class, education, and ethnicity.Methods: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), collected over seven waves (2002–2016) (n = 7,890) is examined in an event history framework. Cox proportional hazard models are used with the Andersen Gill extension in case of multiple failures per respondent.Results: Persistent associations of lower occupational class, lower education, and having a black or minority ethnic background are found with increased hazards of functional health loss and wealth loss. Earlier born cohorts have lower hazards for functional health loss, wealth loss, and bereavement. Women have higher hazards for bereavement, and lower hazards for wealth loss.Discussion: The timing of adverse events is a crucial gateway through which existing social inequalities are transferred into unequal aging pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram Vanhoutte & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Age Takes Hold of Us by Surprise: Conceptualizing Vulnerabilities in Aging as the Timing of Adverse Events [Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(1), pages 152-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:152-160.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Felder, 2006. "The gender longevity gap: explaining the difference between singles and couples," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 543-557, July.
    2. Mary Ellen Stone & Jielu Lin & Dale Dannefer & Jessica A. Kelley-Moore, 2017. "The Continued Eclipse of Heterogeneity in Gerontological Research," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(1), pages 162-167.
    3. Jersey Liang & Joan M. Bennett & Benjamin A. Shaw & Ana R. Quiñones & Wen Ye & Xiao Xu & Mary Beth Ofstedal, 2008. "Gender Differences in Functional Status in Middle and Older Age: Are There Any Age Variations?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(5), pages 282-292.
    4. Matthew L Hughes & Margie E Lachman, 2018. "Social Comparisons of Health and Cognitive Functioning Contribute to Changes in Subjective Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 816-824.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhoutte, Bram, 2019. "Age takes hold of us by surprise: Conceptualising Vulnerabilities in Ageing as the Timing of Adverse Events - Pre-print," SocArXiv xqjwv, Center for Open Science.
    2. Kasey Buckles & Melanie Guldi & Joseph Price, 2011. "Changing the Price of Marriage: Evidence from Blood Test Requirements," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 46(3), pages 539-567.
    3. Martin Gaechter & Peter Schwazer & Engelbert Theurl, 2012. "Stronger Sex but Earlier Death: A Multi-level Socioeconomic Analysis of Gender Differences in Mortality in Austria," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 1-23, March.
    4. Stefan Felder, 2006. "Lebenserwartung, medizinischer Fortschritt und Gesundheitsausgaben: Theorie und Empirie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(s1), pages 49-73, May.
    5. Martin Gächter & Engelbert Theurl, 2010. "Socioeconomic Environment and Mortality: A two-level Decomposition by Sex and Cause of Death," Working Papers 2010-18, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    6. Linda Waite & Aniruddha Das, 2010. "Families, social life, and well-being at older ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 87-109, March.
    7. Susanne Wurm & Maja Wiest & Julia K. Wolff & Ann-Kristin Beyer & Svenja M. Spuling, 2020. "Changes in views on aging in later adulthood: the role of cardiovascular events," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 457-467, December.
    8. Eunsun Kwon & Sojung Park, 2017. "Heterogeneous Trajectories of Physical and Mental Health in Late Middle Age: Importance of Life-Course Socioeconomic Positions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Yannick Stephan & Angelina R. Sutin & Antonio Terracciano, 2020. "Physical activity and subjective age across adulthood in four samples," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 469-476, December.
    10. Joann M. Montepare, 2020. "Publisher Correction to: An exploration of subjective age, actual age, age awareness, and engagement in everyday," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 489-497, December.
    11. Pruchno, Rachel & Wilson-Genderson, Maureen & Heid, Allison R. & Cartwright, Francine P., 2021. "Effects of peri-traumatic stress experienced during Hurricane Sandy on functional limitation trajectories for older men and women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Loredana Ivan & Eugène Loos & George Tudorie, 2020. "Mitigating Visual Ageism in Digital Media: Designing for Dynamic Diversity to Enhance Communication Rights for Senior Citizens," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Maria Ganczak & Krzysztof Chrobrowski & Marcin Korzeń, 2018. "Predictors of a Change and Correlation in Activities of Daily Living after Hip Fracture in Elderly Patients in a Community Hospital in Poland: A Six-Month Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Johannes Schuenemann & Holger Strulik & Timo Trimborn, 2020. "The Marriage Gap: Optimal Aging and Death in Partnerships," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 36, pages 158-176, April.
    15. Juan Fan & Guangwei Huang, 2023. "Are Women More Vulnerable to Flooding Than Men in an Aging Japanese Society?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    16. Liang, Jersey & Wang, Chia-Ning & Xu, Xiao & Hsu, Hui-Chuan & Lin, Hui-Shen & Lin, Yu-Hsuan, 2010. "Trajectory of functional status among older Taiwanese: Gender and age variations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1208-1217, September.
    17. Ang, Shannon, 2018. "Social participation and health over the adult life course: Does the association strengthen with age?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 51-59.
    18. Ang, Shannon, 2019. "Intersectional cohort change: Disparities in mobility limitations among older Singaporeans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 223-231.
    19. Mi Jung Lee & Daejin Kim & Sergio Romero & Ickpyo Hong & Nikolay Bliznyuk & Craig Velozo, 2022. "Examining Older Adults’ Home Functioning Using the American Housing Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Linda G. Martin & Zachary Zimmer & Jinkook Lee, 2017. "Foundations of Activity of Daily Living Trajectories of Older Americans," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(1), pages 129-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:152-160.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.