IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v46y2019i2p267-290..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The trade effect of private standards

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Andersson

Abstract

Recent changes in the agrifood sector have fuelled the use of private food standards. These standards are voluntary and generally serve as a risk management tool. This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between private food standards and trade. Specifically, we analyse the effect of certification to GlobalGAP on EU15 imports of fresh fruits and vegetables at product level using a gravity-type model with fixed effects. We find that certification to GlobalGAP has a positive effect on both the extensive and the intensive margin of trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Andersson, 2019. "The trade effect of private standards," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(2), pages 267-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:267-290.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jby027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meemken, Eva-Marie, 2021. "Large farms, large benefits? Sustainability certification among family farms and agro-industrial producers in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Laura M. G. Hidalgo & Rosane N. de Faria & Roberta Souza Piao & Christine Wieck, 2023. "Multiplicity of sustainability standards and potential trade costs in the palm oil industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 263-284, January.
    3. Lijiao Hu & Yuqing Zheng & Timothy A. Woods & Yoko Kusunose & Steven Buck, 2023. "The market for private food safety certifications: Conceptual framework, review, and future research directions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 197-220, March.
    4. Md Ali Emam & Markus Leibrecht & Tinggui Chen, 2022. "The Impact of a “National Green Export Review” on Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence for Ecuador’s Fish Exports," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Ni, Shiying & Bai, Xiwen & Li, Lefei, 2022. "Behind the heterogeneous trade effects of standards: Multi-sector evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Sylvanus Kwaku Afesorgbor & Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor & Binyam Afewerk Demena, 2024. "Do regional trade agreements affect agri‐food trade? Evidence from a meta‐analysis," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 737-759, June.
    7. Chen, Yuquan & Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe & Tan, Fuli, 2021. "An assessment of the effect of the Round Table on Responsible Soy certification on soybean exports," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329433, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    8. Kathy Baylis & Lia Nogueira & Linlin Fan & Kathryn Pace, 2022. "Something fishy in seafood trade? The relation between tariff and non‐tariff barriers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(5), pages 1656-1678, October.
    9. Neda Trifkovic, 2024. "Certifiable management standards, labor productivity, and worker wages: Evidence from the food sector in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 161-184, January.
    10. Lijuan Yang & Weigong Du, 2023. "Catalyst or barrier? Heterogeneous effects of standards on agricultural trade between China and the Belt and Road countries," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 53-79, March.
    11. Xuejun Wang & Huiying Zhou & Dongmei Su, 2022. "Does the internationalisation of China's agri‐food standards affect export quality upgrading?—Evidence from firm‐product‐level data," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 887-911, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:267-290.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.