IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v39y2012i2p241-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chain interdependencies, measurement problems and efficient governance structure: cooperatives versus publicly listed firms

Author

Listed:
  • Li Feng
  • George W. J. Hendrikse

Abstract

We determine the circumstances when the absence of public listing, often believed to be a disadvantage, makes a cooperative the unique efficient governance structure. This is established in a multi-task principal–agent model, capturing that cooperatives are not publicly listed and their CEOs have to bring the downstream enterprise to value as well as to serve upstream member interests. Not having a public listing prevents the CEO from choosing the level of the downstream activities too high. Cooperatives are uniquely efficient when the upstream marginal product multiplied with a function increasing in the strength of the chain complementarities is higher than the downstream marginal product. , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Feng & George W. J. Hendrikse, 2012. "Chain interdependencies, measurement problems and efficient governance structure: cooperatives versus publicly listed firms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(2), pages 241-255, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:39:y:2012:i:2:p:241-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbr007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hakelius, Karin & Hansson, Helena, 2016. "Members’ attitudes towards cooperatives and their perception of agency problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), October.
    2. Qiao Liang & George Hendrikse & Zuhui Huang & Xuchu Xu, 2015. "Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence From Zhejiang Province," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 198-214, April.
    3. George Hendrikse & Li Feng, 2013. "Interfirm cooperatives," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Yuling Gao & Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Service Realization And Determinants In Agricultural Cooperatives In China: Evidence From Zhejiang, Sichuan And Heilongjiang Provinces," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(05), pages 1205-1225, December.
    5. Kamila Ruzickova & Petr Korab, 2013. "Does horizontal cooperation create value? A residual income approach application on Czech agricultural data," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2013-32, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    6. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael, 2016. "Governance and Performance in the U.S. Agri-Food Industry: A Comparative Study of Firms and Cooperatives," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235676, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Liang, Q.X. & Hendrikse, G.W.J., 2012. "Cooperative CEO Identity and Efficient Governance: Member or Outside CEO?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2012-019-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael, 2016. "Capital, Ownership, and Governance: Analyzing the Structure of U.S. Farmer Cooperatives," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235677, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Cadot, Julien, 2014. "Agency costs of vertical integration: the case of wine business in France," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182671, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Wendong Deng & George Hendrikse, 2018. "Social interactions and product quality: the value of pooling in cooperative entrepreneurial networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 749-761, April.
    11. Michael Kopel & Marco Marini, 2014. "Strategic delegation in consumer cooperatives under mixed oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 275-296, November.
    12. Claude Ménard, 2018. "Organization and governance in the agrifood sector: How can we capture their variety?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 142-160, December.
    13. Sebhatu, Kifle T. & Gezahegn, Tafesse W. & Berhanu, Tekeste & Maertens, Miet & Passel, Steven Van & D'Haese, Marijke, 2021. "Exploring variability across cooperatives: economic performance of agricultural cooperatives in northern Ethiopia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    14. Marcos-Matas, Gustavo & Ruggeri, Arianna & Ghelfi, Rino, 2018. "The Role of Members' Commitment on Agri-Food Co-Operatives' Capitalization, Innovation and Performance," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), March.
    15. Miguel Hernández‐Espallardo & Narciso Arcas‐Lario & Jorge L. Sánchez‐Navarro & Gustavo Marcos‐Matás, 2022. "Curbing members' opportunism in first‐tier and federated agricultural marketing cooperatives," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 195-219, January.
    16. Julien Cadot, 2015. "Agency costs of vertical integration—the case of family firms, investor-owned firms and cooperatives in the French wine industry," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 46(2), pages 187-194, March.
    17. Vandeplas, Anneleen, 2011. "Multinationals or Cooperatives: Does it Matter to Farmers? - A Study of the Dairy Sector in Punjab (India)," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115545, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Hannah K. Westerholz & Julia Höhler, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in the food industry—Comparison of co‐operatives and investor‐owned dairies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 211-222, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:39:y:2012:i:2:p:241-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.