IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v21y1994i3-4p451-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Readings of Spatial Differentiation: The Rural versus the Local Economy Approach in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Saraceno, Elena

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Saraceno, Elena, 1994. "Alternative Readings of Spatial Differentiation: The Rural versus the Local Economy Approach in Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 21(3-4), pages 451-474.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:21:y:1994:i:3-4:p:451-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Pascucci, 2008. "Periurban agriculture and rural development strategies: a comment," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 2, May.
    2. Elisa Montresor, 2002. "Rural Development and Local Agricultural Systems: a Methodological View," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, February.
    3. Elisabetta Basile & Claudio Cecchi, 1997. "Beyond the sectors an analysis of economic differentiation in rural economy," Working Papers in Public Economics 29, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    4. Yves Léon & . European Association of Agricultural Economists, 1999. "The economic analysis of rural development," Post-Print hal-01931596, HAL.
    5. Michel Blanc, 1997. "La ruralité : diversité des approches," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 242(1), pages 5-12.
    6. Z. Bednaříková & T. Doucha, 2009. "The impacts of agricultural policy scenarios on development of remote rural areas - the case study of the Bruntál and Ostrava districts," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 161-168.
    7. Peter Midmore, 1998. "Rural Policy Reform and Local Development Programmes: Appropriate Evaluation Procedures," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 409-426, September.
    8. Philip Kostov & John Lingard, 2004. "Rural Development as Risk Management," Others 0409013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Montresor, Elisa, 2002. "Rural Development: an Analytical Approach at Different Territorial Levels," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24960, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Vladislav Valentinov & Karin Larsen, 2010. "Toward a transaction cost economics of rural development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(1), pages 24-31, February.
    11. Giovanni Anania & Alessia Tenuta, 2008. "Rurality, urbanity and wealth in the Italian "Comuni"," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 1, March.
    12. Roberto ESPOSTI & Franco SOTTE, 1999. "Territorial Heterogeneity and Institutional Structures in Shaping Rural Development Policies in Europe," Working Papers 114, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:21:y:1994:i:3-4:p:451-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.