IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sap/wpaper/wp29.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond the sectors an analysis of economic differentiation in rural economy

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabetta Basile
  • Claudio Cecchi

Abstract

This paper analyses rural change in industrialised countries according to a long term economic perspective. From a structural point of view, the key feature of the current rural transformation is productive differentiation, that is the change in sectoral composition of the economy in rural areas due to the emergence of non-farm activities in an environment traditionally dominated by agriculture. Differentiation points out the presence of new actors in the countryside and innovative equilibria in the use of rural resources and, as a process, is at the source of a new form of productive and social organisation of the rural space, giving rise to new patterns of relations between sectors and actors (internally to the rural space) and new modes of integration of the rural world within the economic system. The emphasis on differentiation discloses the limits of conventional approaches, which consider the current rural transition as a ""renaissance"" of the countryside or, alternatively, as a by-product of the restructuring processes which occur in the global economy. In one case, the emphasis is on the conservation and re-production of rural values within a sort of idyllic vision of the country life which embodies the long lasting isolation of the farm economy; in the other, the stress is on the subordination of rural world to the global system, implicitly assuming the countryside as an economic and, at the same time, as a spatial periphery. On the contrary, differentiation shows the capacity of reaction of rural areas to structural change in the economy through intersectoral linkages, and emphasises their integration with the socioeconomic system: in a way, rural differentiation may be seen as the result of an interplay of local forces from rural areas and global forces from macro processes. Therefore, the investigation on differentiation patterns is a key to a wider comprehension of structural dynamics exerting an impact on the rural world. The new form of economic and social organisation resulting from the interplay of local and global forces gives rise to the rural economy, which may be conceptualised as a socio-spatial system characterised by sectoral differentiation and spatial localisation. In this sense, the rural economy would be a sort of new sector differing from agriculture and industry for the scope and pattern of intersectoral relations, and from the urban sector for its links with the territory and physical environment. The rural economy is the subject of our analysis, which aims to explore its socio-economic organisation and its position within an advanced economic system. The paper is organised as follows. The next section supplies the general framework for our analysis; this part is not intended to be a literature review, but rather a sort of review of relevant issues for the analysis of the link between rural change and economic growth from three complementary perspectives : the balance of the sectors in the economy and in rural areas, and the balance of functions between town and country. The second section investigates on socio-economic processes at the source of rural differentiation; in particular, we focus on three aspects of the rural change in industrialised countries: the impact of integration and adaptation of agriculture into the capitalist economic system (what we call the homologation process) on the use of agricultural resources; the dispersal of industry on rural space as a mover of local development processes involving agricultural resources; the emergence of new consumption patterns which support rural differentiation on the demand side. The third section summarises the whole argument and analyses the position of the rural economy within the capitalist economic growth. Here, we argue that rural differentiation is to be considered as an evolution of rural production relations and we show how our analysis supports this hypothesis; we also show that this conclusion does not necessarily implies that the rural economy represents a progress in life conditions in the countryside.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabetta Basile & Claudio Cecchi, 1997. "Beyond the sectors an analysis of economic differentiation in rural economy," Working Papers in Public Economics 29, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
  • Handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://web.uniroma1.it/dip_ecodir/sites/default/files/wpapers/wp29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kym Anderson, 1987. "On Why Agriculture Declines with Economic Growth," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 1(3), pages 195-207, October.
    2. Saraceno, Elena, 1994. "Alternative Readings of Spatial Differentiation: The Rural versus the Local Economy Approach in Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 21(3-4), pages 451-474.
    3. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 1989. "Sectoral Balance: A Survey," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1989-056, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Moshe Syrquin, 1989. "Sector Proportions and Economic Development: The Evidence since 1950," International Economic Association Series, in: Jeffrey G. Williamson & Vadiraj R. Panchamukhi (ed.), The Balance between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development, chapter 2, pages 32-53, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Thomson, Jo Traill, 1995. "Rural Futures: Issues for the forthcoming Rural White Paper," Department of Agricultural Economics Archive 260468, University of Exeter.
    6. Lance Taylor, 1989. "Theories of Sectoral Balance," International Economic Association Series, in: Jeffrey G. Williamson & Vadiraj R. Panchamukhi (ed.), The Balance between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 3-31, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Syrquin, Moshe, 1988. "Patterns of structural change," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 7, pages 203-273, Elsevier.
    8. Vadiraj R. Panchamukhi & R. G. Nambiar & R. Mehta, 1989. "Structural Change and Economic Growth in Developing Countries," International Economic Association Series, in: Jeffrey G. Williamson & Vadiraj R. Panchamukhi (ed.), The Balance between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development, chapter 3, pages 54-84, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Peter Timmer, C., 1988. "The agricultural transformation," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 275-331, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badiane, Ousmane, 1990. "The Role of Agriculture and Trade In Economic Development," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183495, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Roberto ESPOSTI, 2007. "On the Decline of Agriculture. Evidence from Italian Regions in the Post-WWII Period," Working Papers 300, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    3. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    4. Douglas Gollin & Stephen L. Parente & Richard Rogerson, 2004. "Farm Work, Home Work, and International Productivity Differences," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 7(4), pages 827-850, October.
    5. Punyasavatsut, Chaiyuth & Coxhead, Ian A., 2002. "On The Decline Of Agriculture In Developing Countries: A Reinterpretation Of The Evidence," Staff Papers 12659, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Michler, Jeffrey D., 2020. "Agriculture in the process of development: A micro-perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Silvia CODERONI & Roberto ESPOSTI, 2011. "Is there a Long-Term Relationship between Agricultural GHG Emissions and Productivity Growth? The Case of Italian Agriculture," Working Papers 369, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    8. Gollin, Douglas & Parente, Stephen L. & Rogerson, Richard, 2007. "The food problem and the evolution of international income levels," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 1230-1255, May.
    9. van Rooyen, Johan & Machethe, Charles, 1991. "Determining The Agricultural Sector'S Role In Regional Development In South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 30(4), December.
    10. Silvia Coderoni & Roberto Esposti, 2014. "Is There a Long-Term Relationship Between Agricultural GHG Emissions and Productivity Growth? A Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 58(2), pages 273-302, June.
    11. repec:phd:pjdevt:jpd_1993_vol__xx_no__2-e is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kym Anderson, 2018. "Mining’s impact on the competitiveness of other sectors in a resource-rich economy: Australia since the 1840s," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 31(1), pages 141-151, May.
    13. Dennis, Benjamin N. & Iscan, Talan B., 2007. "Productivity growth and agricultural out-migration in the United States," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 52-74, March.
    14. Juan Alberto Vázquez-Muñoz, 2018. "La acumulación de capital como un determinante de la tasa de crecimiento de la ley de Thirlwall," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 63(3), pages 13-14, Julio-Sep.
    15. Bianca AVRAM POP & Simona SABOU, 2018. "The Role Of Agriculture In Romanian Development," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 5-18, March.
    16. Anastasios Xepapadeas & Esma Amri, 1998. "Some Empirical Indications of the Relationship Between Environmental Quality and Economic Development," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 93-106, January.
    17. Emran, M. Shahe & Shilpi, Forhad, 2015. "Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka," MPRA Paper 66017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Douglas Gollin & Stephen Parente & Richard Rogerson, 2002. "The Role of Agriculture in Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 160-164, May.
    19. Del Prete, Davide & Ghins, Léopold & Magrini, Emiliano & Pauw, Karl, 2019. "Land consolidation, specialization and household diets: Evidence from Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-149.
    20. Colistete, Renato P., 2010. "Revisiting Import-Substituting Industrialisation in Post-War Brazil," MPRA Paper 24665, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Wang, Can & Deng, Mengzhi & Deng, Junfeng, 2020. "Factor reallocation and structural transformation implications of grain subsidies in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luisa Giuriato (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dprosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.