IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i6p1454-1469..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Street Skateboarding and the Aesthetic Order of Public Spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Dickinson
  • Andrew Millie
  • Eleanor Peters

Abstract

Street skateboarders are often excluded from public spaces with skating viewed as anti-social or uncivil. In this article, we argue that it can also be regarded as problematic as it interferes with the look and feel of cities as promoted by late-modern capitalism. The article contributes to an aesthetic criminology by arguing that street skateboarding is itself an aesthetic practice, but that this practice challenges the functionality and aesthetic order of the city. The article is supported by evidence from interviews with skateboarders in Manchester, UK. The context is the duel position of skateboarding, being regarded as both deviant and serious leisure (for instance, featuring for the first time in the Olympics in 2021). Rather than criminalizing and excluding skateboarders, it is argued that their aesthetic appreciation of public spaces could add value to city life, that they see and feel the city in ways that ought to add to our emotional and affective appreciation of what it means to live in a city.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Dickinson & Andrew Millie & Eleanor Peters, 2022. "Street Skateboarding and the Aesthetic Order of Public Spaces," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(6), pages 1454-1469.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:6:p:1454-1469.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Woolley & Teresa Hazelwood & Ian Simkins, 2011. "Don't Skate Here: Exclusion of Skateboarders from Urban Civic Spaces in Three Northern Cities in England," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(04), pages 471-487.
    2. Adam Jenson & Jon Swords & Michael Jeffries, 2012. "The Accidental Youth Club: Skateboarding in Newcastle-Gateshead," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 371-388.
    3. Peter Rogers & Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Moral panics and urban renaissance," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 321-340, December.
    4. Kurt Iveson, 2013. "Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 941-956, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Bloch, 2016. "Why do Graffiti Writers Write on Murals? The Birth, Life, and Slow Death of Freeway Murals in Los Angeles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 451-471, March.
    2. Golnesa Rezanezhad Pishkhani & Mattias De Backer, 2024. "The Micro-Politics of Artistic Production among Artists with a Migration Background," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Phil Hubbard, 2008. "Regulating the Social Impacts of Studentification: A Loughborough Case Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 323-341, February.
    4. Stefano Bloch, 2015. "Book review: Street Art, Public City: Law, Crime and the Urban Imagination," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(13), pages 2500-2503, October.
    5. Jonny Pickering & Keith Kintrea & Jon Bannister, 2012. "Invisible Walls and Visible Youth," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 945-960, April.
    6. Hanna Hilbrandt, 2019. "Everyday urbanism and the everyday state: Negotiating habitat in allotment gardens in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 352-367, February.
    7. Federico Savini, 2016. "Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1152-1169, November.
    8. Rory Crath, 2017. "Governing youth as an aesthetic and spatial practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(5), pages 1263-1279, April.
    9. Miza Moreau, 2024. "In/formal reappropriations: Spatialised needs and desires in residential alleys in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1031-1048, May.
    10. Claire E Bach & Nathan McClintock, 2021. "Reclaiming the city one plot at a time? DIY garden projects, radical democracy, and the politics of spatial appropriation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 859-878, August.
    11. Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Peter Aning Tedong & Jill L. Grant & Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz, 2015. "Governing Enclosure: The Role of Governance in Producing Gated Communities and Guarded Neighborhoods in Malaysia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 112-128, January.
    13. Qiu, Yixin & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Arndt, Félix & Ng, Wilson, 2023. "Microfoundations and dynamics of do-it-yourself ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Megan Heim LaFrombois, 2017. "Blind spots and pop-up spots: A feminist exploration into the discourses of do-it-yourself (DIY) urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 421-436, February.
    15. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    16. Lummina G. Horlings & Christian Lamker & Emma Puerari & Ward Rauws & Gwenda van der Vaart, 2021. "Citizen Engagement in Spatial Planning, Shaping Places Together," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Sara Mela, 2021. "La creazione di un laboratorio permanente di rigenerazione urbana. Un percorso di ricerca-azione nel quartiere aurora di Torino," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 91-101.
    18. Michele Acuto & Cecilia Dinardi & Colin Marx, 2019. "Transcending (in)formal urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 475-487, February.
    19. Sophie L. Van Neste & Gilles Sénécal, 2015. "Claiming Rights To Mobility Through The Right To Inhabitance: Discursive Articulations from Civic Actors in Montreal," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 218-233, March.
    20. Amirzadeh, Melika & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "The evolutionary path of place making: From late twentieth century to post-pandemic cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:6:p:1454-1469.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.